Free Essay

Toyota vs Ford

In: Business and Management

Submitted By rami9z
Words 671
Pages 3
References
Advance! Business Consulting B.V. (2009). The Rise of Toyota. Retrieved 03 29, 2016, from Advance Business Consulting: http://www.advancebusinessconsulting.com/advance!/strategic-alignment/strategic-alignment-business-cases/the-rise-of-toyota.aspx
Bunkley, N. (2016). Ford won’t blindly chase market share. Automotive News, 90(6708), 0032.
Edwards, J. (2012). Mastering Strategic Management ( 1st Canadian Edition ed.). Retrieved 04 01, 2016, from http://opentextbc.ca/strategicmanagement/chapter/types-of-international-strategies/
Funaru, M. (n.d.). Toyota’s business strategies in international markets. Braşov: University of Braşov. Retrieved 04 01, 2016, from http://feaa.ucv.ro/annals/v3_2010/0038v3-004.pdf
Gillis, C. (2015, September 13). What’s it really like in the driver’s seat of a driverless car? Mclean’s. Retrieved from http://www.macleans.ca
Henry, J. (2015, August 30). One Ford, Part Two; Tweaking The Master Plan. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com
Hitt, M., Ireland, R. & Hoskisson, R. (2015). Strategic management : competitiveness & globalization : concepts & cases. Stamford, Conn: Cengage Learning.
Negi, R. (2013, 03 27). Toyota: Analysis of Vision Statement, Corporate Level Strategies & SWOT. Retrieved 04 02, 2016, from Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/rohannegi/toyota-analysis-of-vision-statement-corporate-level-strategies-swot
NYSE. (2016). Financials for Ford Motor Company. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3AF&fstype=ii&ei=n0f5VrjeEojUigKop5rADg
NYSE. (2016). Historical prices for Ford Motor Company. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from http://www.google.com/finance/historical?q=NYSE%3AF&ei=aUj5VrG3Eq3BiwL3zZzwCQ&start=30&num=30
NYSE. (2016). Financials for Toyota Motor Corp. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ATM&fstype=ii&ei=zVD5VomsKJLSiALarZWAAw
NYSE. (2016). Historical prices for Toyota Motor Corp. Retrieved March 28, 2016 from http://www.google.com/finance/historical?q=NYSE%3ATM&ei=xFH5VsHqG63BiwL3zZzwCQ&start=30&num=30
Rogers, C. (2015, November 9). Ford Moves Ford Credit CFO Michael Seneski to Director of Corporate Strategy. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/
Sachinramani. (2009, 12 03). Corporate Level Strategy. Retrieved 04 01, 2016, from MGT429Awesome: http://mgt429awesome.wikispaces.com/page/code/Corporate+Level+Strategy
Schmitt, B. (2011, January 28). Hyundai 4th Largest Automaker, Overtakes Ford. The Truth About Cars. Retrieved from http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com
The Ford Motor Company. (2016). Ford Delivers Breakthrough in 2015 with Record Full Year Pre-Tax Profit of $10.8B; Net Income of $7.4B; Fourth Quarter Pre-Tax Profit up 96 Percent. [Press release]. Retrieved from http://media.ford.com/content/dam/fordmedia/North%20America/US/2016/01/28/4qfinancials.pdf
The Ford Motor Company. (n.d.). Our Strategy. Retrieved from http://corporate.ford.com/microsites/sustainability-report-2013-14/blueprint-strategy.html

The Ford Motor Company. (n.d.). Company Timeline. Retrieved from http://corporate.ford.com/company/history.html

The Ford Motor Company. (2005). Ford Motor Company 2005 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://ophelia.sdsu.edu:8080/ford/12-30-2012/doc/2005_AR_full.pdf
The Ford Motor Company. (2010). Ford Motor Company 2010 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://ophelia.sdsu.edu:8080/ford/12-30-2012/doc/ir_2010_annual_report.pdf
The Ford Motor Company. (2015). Ford Motor Company 2015 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://corporate.ford.com/content/dam/corporate/en/investors/reports-and-filings/Annual%20Reports/2015-Annual-Report.pdf
Thembani, N. (2013). Analysis of Toyota Motor Corporation. Retrieved 03 02, 2016, from http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/tnkomo/files/analysis_of_toyota.pdf
Thompson Rivers University. (2015). Economic Value Added (Lecture). Retrieved from http://barabus.tru.ca/mba/busn6211/busn6211_mod12_lec1.html
Toyota. (2016). Toyota Global Vision. Retrieved 04 02, 2016, from Toyota: http://www.toyota-global.com/company/vision_philosophy/toyota_global_vision_2020.html
White, J. (2016, January 4). Ford, Toyota team up on software to counter Apple, Google. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/
Wikipedia. (2016, 02 04). Sakichi Toyoda. Retrieved 04 01, 2016, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sakichi_Toyoda
Wikipedia. (2016, 04 08). Toyota. Retrieved 04 08, 2016, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota
Woodall, B. (2012, January 24). Ford marks turnaround juncture with new slogan. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ford vs Dell

...business that the Ford Motor Company has excelled in since 1903. Ford can never be virtually integrated like Dell but the Ford Company can adopt some of Dell’s concepts of virtual integration to strive for excellence in supply chain management. As Director of Supply Chain Systems, I am convinced that Ford can implement portions of Dell’s Virtual Integration strategy even though the Ford Company differs in many respects from Dell. A modification of the virtual integration system that Dell uses should be applied to Ford’s supplier base, distribution system, dealerships, and divisions. Issue Identification Ford must find ways to improve their supply chain management to compete in a global market and continue to retain its market share in an increasingly competitive, saturated and over capacitated US market. Ford must act now or risk losing market share. The main issue Ford must deal with is decreasing the volume and complexity of its supplier base as it is plagued with costly inefficiencies. Secondly, Ford must get closer to its customers to better understand their needs and wants and to create better forecasting of demand. Teri Takai must decide within a week if Ford should model its supply chain strategy close to Dell’s Virtual Integration. Environment and Root Cause Analysis The Ford Motor Company is the 2nd largest industrial corporation in the world with revenues of $144 billion. Ford employs over 370,000 employees and has operations in 200 countries. What Ford does......

Words: 1490 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Toyota vs Ford

...Toyota and Ford Comparison L. Johnson MGT680-1203B-12 Abstract Toyota and Ford companies are two of the major players in the auto industry. Comparing the two companies helps to understand what contributes to the success of each. The SWOT analysis can be used to identify weaknesses and a plan of action to turn those into strengths. The current issues faced by each company affect how it operates globally. It is important for each company to understand how each issue affects its operations. Introduction Every firm creates a relationship between the political and economic forces within its community. Toyota and Ford understand the importance of developing a strategic plan that guides them on how to create effective relationships within the community. This helps with building brand name, which both companies have done successfully. Ford and Toyota’s current position on the main issues that they face and a SWOT will be done to show their current market position. Issues The following table will compare the current issues faced by Ford and Toyota. The current position/views of each company are briefly explained. The purpose of this table is to understand how Ford and Toyota view their responsibility to the community. Understanding the companies’ positions help to develop strategic plan suggestions. |Issues |Ford |Toyota | |Legal, Social and......

Words: 4068 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Ford vs Toyota

...You are to develop the fundamentals of strategic plans for the Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation, two giants of the automobile industry. You are to develop SWOT analyses and propose strategies for the two multinational enterprises. In doing so, it will be necessary to research, analyze, and compare both firms to understand better their current position and future plans to increase competitive advantage. Common problems facing each auto giant today are the current economy; the competition of the other auto firms; and the demand for a lower cost, more ecologically friendly, alternative fuel vehicle. Your research should include the following issues for both firms. Present your data in the form of a comparative table. Issues Ford Toyota Legal, Social and Economic Environments Management Structure Operational & Financial Issues Analysis of Strategic Intent Social and External Challenges Current Manufacturing Facilities & Distribution System Market Demand & Demographics Alternative Fuels & Propulsion Systems Your document must evaluate, compare and contrast Ford’s and Toyota's current position on these issues. Respond to the following: 2. Take the perspective of Ford's Director of Strategic Planning to develop a full SWOT analysis of Ford, identifying and explaining at least five factors for each category (strengths...

Words: 280 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ford vs Dell

...Executive Summary FORDs current method of controlling all aspects of the manufacturing is outdated and is limiting the corporation’s annual results. In order to stay competitive and become efficient again, FORD needs to re-evaluate their current supply chain and implement key portions of DELLs vertically integrated supply chain model. A proper implementation will increase information flow between suppliers, departments and dealers resulting in a reduction of redundant inventory and focus towards just in time inventory. All of these factors will further drive up the already US industry leading profit margin per vehicle. In order to accomplish these goals FORD needs to refocus the Purchasing department’s responsibilities, consolidate and develop suppliers that deliver finished high level components and increase the information flow across all points of the supply chain. These steps will help to introduce a more pull-based system.   Contents Issue identification 1 Environmental and root cause analysis 2 Alternatives/Options 3 Recommendations 4 Implementation 5 Monitor & Control 6 Issue identification • Current order to delivery (OTD) is more than 60 days. • Management of large supplier network. • Utilization of IT is lacking. • Purchasing isn’t integrated into Product development. • Independent dealership network has resulted in FORDs loss of control over customer service experiences. This network also breeds FORD vs. FORD sales......

Words: 863 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation

...Running Head: Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation AIU – MGT680 Abstract Two major automakers are Toyota and Ford. This paper will compare the two companies to better understand the contributions to for success of each company. This paper will include a SWOT analysis which identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to these companies. It will also include a plan of action for one weakness to turn them into strengths. It will discuss the current issues being faced by each company and how it affects the global operation because of the importance.   Ford Motor Company and the Toyota Motor Corporation Ford Motor Company was started by Henry Ford in 1903 (Heritage, 2014). Toyota Motor Corporation was started by Kiichiro Toyoda in 1935 (50 Years, 2014). While each firm has been able to develop a relationship between the political and economic forces within their communities, they also understand a strategic plan is important and will guide them to an effective relationship within their communities. This type of plan will help the two firms build brand name as both firms have successfully done. The following table will illustrate the main issues Ford and Toyota are facing. It briefly explains the current position or view of each company to help better understand who the two firms view their community responsibilities. Issues Ford Toyota Legal, Social and Economic......

Words: 2517 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ford vs. General Motors

...12/12/2013 Business Finance Ford Vs. General Motors I have decided to do my comparison project for my Business Finance class over Ford and General Motors Corporation. They are both car companies that are in the market of making compact, mid-sized, luxury, and SUV classes. They are similar in many ways and are also very different in many ways. General Motors was more affected by the recession of 2007 to 2009 and were part of the great bailout, where Ford was more self-supported and took care of itself without having to have any help from the bailout. I am taking information for this report from the years of 2010 to 2012 as the 2013 information is not yet out. I will start with Ford on the issue of stocks and then go into General Motors. I will try to do my best to compare them to one another and point out the highlights of both companies. First off, Ford. Ford had only 9.15% of its liabilities paid out to stockholders in 2012, which was similar to its 2011 percentage of liabilities to stockholders in 2011 with a rating of 9.2%. In 2010, only .41% of its liabilities were stockholders shares of stock. Common stock in the years 2010 to 2012 were all about the same. The balance sheet shows that anywhere from 38,000 to 40,000 were the numbers of owed common stock dividends. There was no information on Preferred Stock or Redeemable Preferred Stock so I am assuming that there were no shares of this stock available over these years for Ford. I would say that......

Words: 1376 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Ford, Toyota and Nike

...Ford, Toyota, Nike and SeaWorld Corp. There are several similarities between Ford, Toyota, Nike and SeaWorld. Although the industries between Ford and Toyota are similar in the automotive group, the Nike and SeaWorld group would appear to be incomparable. However, in similarities Ford, Toyota, Nike and SeaWorld are large multi-million dollar profitable companies. They are all publicly traded companies. They have all had tragedies that closely involve the guests that have used their products. Ford and Toyota are automotive companies that have existed since the early 1900’s. Ford and Toyota are publicly traded companies both internationally and domestically. This leads to the cultural differences with these two companies. They both export into foreign countries; the United States to other countries and Toyota imports to the United States thus being a foreign country to Toyota’s Japan headquarters. SeaWorld Corp. has recently been acquired by The Blackstone Group which is headquartered in the United Kingdom. The entity Merlin Entertainment is a portion of The Blackstone Group and has investments in such companies as Legoland USA and Madame Tussaunds which is located internationally and domestically. All of these companies have a commitment to improving their carbon footprint. SeaWorld has the SeaWorld Conservation Fund which financially supports endangered animals. Ford and Toyota have created hybrid cars which are helping to reduce the pollution into the environment.......

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Toyota vs. Ford

...Ford vs Toyota Ford Motor Company is the second-largest automobile company in the world. Ford's main focus is automobiles; however, they also operate in Ford Credit and Hertz Corporation. Ford also has controlling interest in Mazda Motor Corporation. Ford was established June, 1903; in an old wagon factory in Detroit Michigan. In 1903, Ford began production on a two-cylinder, 8 horsepower called the Model A. They produced a total of 1,708 of these cars in their first year of operation. Toyota Motor Corporation was Japan's largest car company. Toyota ranked the world's third largest by the year 2000. The company could produce near five million car units annually in the 1990s and controlled approximately 10 percent of the global market. Toyota was founded by a man named Kiichiro Toyoda in 1933. He did not produce his first car until 1935. By this time General Motors and Ford were already operating in Japan. Both companies are manufactures of cars which are sold in the United States. One is made in Japan and the other in the United States. They are both a financially well because of the popularity of their cars. The accounting criteria's that they both face are different because of the foreign rules and regulations. Both companies are faced with their own set of rules that have to be followed, but Toyota is faced with more issues since they sell their cars in the United States How does a U.S. company differ from a foreign company? What reporting regulations are different or the...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ford vs Chevy

...Ford vs Chevrolet Ford and Chevrolet (Chevy) are in the automotive industry and have been in completion for many years start back in 1908, both companies started in the state of Michigan and have been battling it out for profits, market share and hometown bragging rights. Ford was founded in the suburb of Dearborn, Michigan and Chevy was founded in Flint, Michigan. Ford and Chevy both are good-producing sectors, they both manufacture automobiles that are similar but different. They each have a mission statement, Ford’s mission statement “One Team, One Plan, One Goal.” Ford’s mission statement is defined to each part of the statement, One Team meaning people working together as a lean, global enterprise. One Plan meaning aggressively restructure to operate profitably at the current demand and changing model mix, developing new products our customers want and value, finance our plan and improve our balance sheet, and work together as one team. One Goal meaning an exciting viable Ford delivering profitable growth for all. Chevy’s mission statement is an unofficial statement “We win when the customer says we win.” Chevy has an unofficial mission statement but uses more of Five Principles to guide its business, Safety and Quality First, create long-life customers, innovate, deliver long-term investment value and make a positive difference. Both Ford and Chevy are oligopoly competition, being that both companies supplies a large portion of the automotive industry. Being in...

Words: 1311 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Hitler vs Ford

...German Studies Association Adolf Hitler vs. Henry Ford: The Volkswagen, the Role of America as a Model, and the Failure of a Nazi Consumer Society Author(s): Wolfgang König Source: German Studies Review, Vol. 27, No. 2 (May, 2004), pp. 249-268 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press on behalf of the German Studies Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1433081 . Accessed: 11/11/2013 18:23 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . The Johns Hopkins University Press and German Studies Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to German Studies Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 140.203.12.206 on Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:23:56 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The AdolfHitlervs.HenryFord: Volkswagen, the Role of America as a Model, and the Failureof a Nazi ConsumerSociety WolfgangKinig TechnischeUniversitat Berlin the to Abstract:Modeling consumer States,NaziGermany planned societyoftheUnited witha......

Words: 8203 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay

Ford vs Dell

...Ford vs Dell Executive Summary FORDs current method of controlling all aspects of the manufacturing is outdated and is limiting the corporation’s annual results. In order to stay competitive and become efficient again, FORD needs to re-evaluate their current supply chain and implement key portions of DELLs vertically integrated supply chain model. A proper implementation will increase information flow between suppliers, departments and dealers resulting in a reduction of redundant inventory and focus towards just in time inventory. All of these factors will further drive up the already US industry leading profit margin per vehicle. In order to accomplish these goals FORD needs to refocus the Purchasing department’s responsibilities, consolidate and develop suppliers that deliver finished high level components and increase the information flow across all points of the supply chain. These steps will help to introduce a more pull-based system.   Contents Issue identification 1 Environmental and root cause analysis 2 Alternatives/Options 3 Recommendations 4 Implementation 5 Monitor & Control 6 Issue identification • Current order to delivery (OTD) is more than 60 days. • Management of large supplier network. • Utilization of IT is lacking. • Purchasing isn’t integrated into Product development. • Independent dealership network has resulted in FORDs loss of control over customer service experiences. This network......

Words: 410 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gm vs Toyota

...A term paper On Competitive Dynamics Submitted to: Kashfia Ahmed Assistant Professor Department of Business Administration East West University Submitted by: The Radiant Group Group members Name: | ID: | Anam Hossain | 2013-3-10-143 | Sourav Saha | 2013-3-10-155 | Md Faqrul Hoque | 2013-3-10-173 | Mousumi Akter Mila | 2013-3-10-024 | Letter of Transmittal 9th April, 2015 To, Kashfia Ahmed Assistant Professor Department of Business Administration, East West University Dhaka-1212 Bangladesh. Subject: Submission of term paper on “Competitive dynamics regarding Toyota Motor Corporation& General Motors.” Dear Madam, We have successfully prepared the term paper titled “Competitive Dynamics regarding Toyota Motor Corporation & General Motors” which we the members of the Radiant group, are submitting along with this letter. The report has been prepared by visiting the website of the company and by taking information from their website. Through our best sincerity, we have tried to uptake all the issues in the report with several limitations. We all had a very good time while collecting the information and preparing the term paper. We really hope that the experience that we have got from working on this paper will help us in future. We sincerely hope that the contents of our paper will meet the requirements of this course and fulfill your expectations. Therefore, we would like to place this paper for your kind judgment and valuable......

Words: 4599 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Bmw vs Toyota

...1. Based on your findings, compare and contrast the two companies on their current inventory management practices and tools employed for the select product/service. BMW BMW approach the issue of maximum efficiency differently to Toyota. For BMW it is more about adjusting to unforeseen circumstances constantly and being able to always have a smooth running operation regardless the problems faced. They implement a very different system to Toyota's Just In Time system but have found it to be very beneficial and profitable. The production starts with metal sheets turned into body parts, then turned in the shell. Before the car is painted, it is combined together with other white body's and put into a stack aka a white body stacker. Maximum efficiency is achieved when all the 20 body's going through the paint shop are being painted the same colour, reducing wait time between changing colours. They are then called the painted body stacker. In this stack the body's are then placed in optimal conditions for their custom customer order. Due to the many variations offered by BMW, such as Coupe, Sedan, Convertibles, Touring, etc. Inventory management in car manufacturing can be complex. There are many variables and constraints that constantly change such as operation times, stacker efficiency, production reliability and other constraints. Moreover time delays, handling and process times are important variables in the process. All these can lead to down times and delivery......

Words: 767 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Honda vs Toyota

...entitled Honda Fails with Toyota to Dominate American Sedan Market: Cars from the website www.businessweek.com; that the dominance of the two major Japanese car makers among U.S. small car and family sedan car market is shifting. The Los Angeles Times has a similar article involving the same two auto makers: Toyota and Honda. The article is entitled Honda, Ford Pass Toyota; the Two Car Brands Rank at the Top of a Consumer Report Survey on Quality. The article was written by a Jerry Hirsch. Hirsch explains that Toyota has been toppled as the leading top-quality automaker, with consumers now looking more favorably on Honda and Ford; this he states is from the Consumer Reports ‘2011 Car Brand Perception Survey (2011, p.12). “A series of massive recalls over the past 18 months has tarnished Toyota’s reputations for quality” (Hirsch, 2011, p.12). According to Hirsch, the Consumer Reports survey ranked Honda first, Ford second, and Toyota finished third (2011, p. 13). Ford has moved up in public perception while Toyota has declined. The Ford brand has outsold Toyota’s line of vehicles last year for the first time since 2006 (Hirsch, 2011). The purpose of this research article was to report and explain to average consumers and businesses alike; that Toyota, a household name among many in the U.S. for reliability is now starting to lose its glamour; and why it is happening. Three major and popular auto brands were studied in the report: Honda, Toyota, and Ford. The......

Words: 865 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gm vs Ford

...ratios like ROA (from 0.05 in 2010 to 0.07 in 2011) and ROE (from 0.23 in 2010 to 0.25 in 2011). While the recession significantly affected GM, it also affected the rest of the automobile industry, including their American competitor Ford Motors. We compare the main differences between these two important companies and analyze the way they reacted to the recession. We also observe the approach that Ford has taken to recovery, in terms of governance, recession reactions and financial branches. The report ends with a conclusion summarizing the key differences between General Motors and Ford Motors, and how these differences influenced their financial performance. We can conclude that the way these two companies compete in the same industry is very different and includes distinctive business models and results. The management styles of their CEOs, where Mulally was a risk taker for Ford, GM had CEOs who had a more conservative approach. The growth strategies employed by the firms are fairly similar, although Ford appears to be slightly more aggressive. Historically, Ford has had higher turnover ratios, which partially helped it to have a better cash position than GM during the crisis. Lastly, the two companies implemented different ways to raise funds; Ford, levering its balance sheet to important levels and GM “selling” its debt (GMAC divestiture) and asking for government intervention. Two different approaches that at the end helped the firms continue being in the market. So......

Words: 11121 - Pages: 45