Free Essay

To Nuke or Not Nuke

In: Business and Management

Submitted By skang6
Words 2247
Pages 9
Background People of the modern world are divided against the existence of nuclear warheads. Therefore, the game that will be analyzed is the nuclear summit scene from G.I. Joe: Retaliation by John M. Chu. In order to understand this scene it is necessary to know that Zartan, a soldier of the Cobra clan, disguised himself as the President of the United States. The scene consists of leaders of Israel, United Kingdom, France, India, North Korea, Russia, and Zartan. The scene begins by talking about reduction of nuclear warheads by 50% by 2016, however, Zartan wishes to have total disarmament as of right now. When the other leaders revolt by saying that the world is safer with nuclear weapons Zartan presses the button to deploy all the nuclear warheads that the United States have, hence stage 1 of the game begins. Once the warheads are in air the leaders of the other countries become flustered and one by one start to deploy their own nuclear war heads towards each other. Once all players deployed the nuclear missiles, Zartan asks if anyone is willing to abort the madness of bombing every country in the world. When no one decides to be the first to abort it’s own nuclear war heads, Zartan self-destructs all of the United States’ nuclear missiles in order to pursue his original goal of a total nuclear free world, hence stage 2 starts. Once Zartan destroyed all the missiles in mid-air, he begins to tell the other leaders to abort and self-destruct their missiles unless they want to destroy the world. As none of the leaders wants to take the blame of creating a mass genocide, all the leaders destroy their own nuclear missiles creating a nuclear free world. As Zartan reaches the goal of total nuclear disarmament, the Cobra Leader enters the scene and introduces the advanced weapon technology created by the Cobra clan. When the asymmetric information between the United States and the other countries are revealed, the leaders of the other countries become outraged. In order to stop the Cobra Clan from destroying their countries, the Cobra Leader wants total submissiveness to the Cobra Clan from each leader leaving all the leaders in a hard spot. It is clear that Zartan initiated all his actions expecting to achieve the ultimate goal of nuclear free world in the end. The team will explore the strategic game theory that show how Zartan was so sure to win due to the setup and the payoffs of the game.

Assumption Although there are 7 players including the US, we will use the US as a trigger that starts the game and group the other 6 countries into two: European/Middle (EU) and Asian countries for simplicity. As professor have mentioned, if the our team were to draw out the first sequential game with 7 players and 2 actions each, the outcome would come out to 128 moves. The gametree with the two groups will be sufficient enough to show the payoffs and the psychological interpretation of all the countries. Also, the outcome of the grouped countries will be shown in simple integers. We understand that human lives and millions of military budget cannot be compared to simple numbers, however, the calculation of each stage will provide sufficient data to validate the perfect evil plan that Zartan has. All of the payoff in both stage 1 and 2 will be written in this order (EU, A).
Because U.S. already knew that they had the “secret weapon” and want all others to get rid of their nuclear bombs after they launched them, the choice that U.S. is going to make is already determined, which is to Fire at stage 1, and Cancel at stage 2. This will be the initial move that will begin each of the stages. Two players, EU and Asia, are playing the games without having all the information because only U.S. knew the information that they had a stronger secret weapon other than nuclear bombs.
Figure 1. Stage 1 Structure

Sequential Game Scenario (Stage 1)
In the first stage, we looked at the game as a sequential game. In this summit meeting, U.S. is the one who first launched the nuclear bomb, and E.U. is the next person who decides what to do due to the fact that he or she sits right next to the president of United States. EU, who is the first mover in this case, has the option to either fire back or do nothing. The next move is then passed over to Asia countries, who must decide whether they are going to counterattack or do nothing after E.U.’s decision. Even if Asian countries think that European Union would counter attack, they still have 2 options; the option of firing and do nothing. The game tree above graphically describes the sequential game scenario of this so-called Nuclear War. All the strategies possible and the rollback equilibrium strategy are as follows:
Figure 2. Possible Strategies for each country All possible strategies Rollback Equilibrium
EU F1, Do Nothing F1
Asia F2F3, F2N3, N2F3, N2N3 F2F3

This would result in a payoff of (-1,-1) which means that everyone fires their nuclear missiles. This brings us to the stage 2 when US suddenly disarms all of its nuclear weapons in the air.
Simultaneous Game Scenario (Stage 2)
Figure 3. Stage 2 Structure US Cancel

European Union Cancel Keep
Cancel 0,0 -2,-1
Keep -1,-2 -2,-2

Now, let’s approach the next stage from the simultaneous game perspective. In the second stage, after all the nuclear bombs are launched, US decide to cancel the bombing while it’s up in the air. This is already determined just like at stage 1, since U.S. is the only one who already knew the top-secret information. Our goal here is to find the nash equilibrium and in what randomness each player will play the game. While all the nuclear bombs are in the air, either Europeans or Asians have choice to stay put or cancel the bombing, knowing that U.S. already put out their bombing. The possibility of mixed strategies in this game structure will be able to represent the psychological affect each other’s probability of choosing either cancel or keep will affect the decision of the other country group.
The payoffs in these games will be shown in simple positive and negative integers. Stage 1 shows a sequential game in which 2 countries can decide to either fire their nuclear weapons or not, given that the US already fired the weapon. As you can see in figure 1, all of the outcomes in stage 1 is negative due to all the destructions and lives lost as a result of a nuclear war. If a country is to fire and get hit, the outcome would be -1 since the country at least got to fight back as a strong nation. On the other hand, the group that only gets attacked but not fight back would have the outcome of -2 since the submissiveness of the government could be portrayed as a weak nation to the citizens. Stage 2 is little bit different because the movie scene shows that as soon as the US decides to disarm the missiles in the air, all the countries have to decide simultaneously if they should cancel the missile as well. The simultaneousness is incorporated in this stage because the missiles will reach the continents soon and all the countries are under time pressure. The payoffs in this table represent the grouped countries’ image to the public. If both of the groups cancel the attack, the public will not find out about the war in general so highest payoff in this chart is 0 for both of the grouped countries. When the nuclear missile is launched, even if one group cancel the missiles, due to the action of the other group, the world will now figure out that there was such happening. The fact that the group who canceled the missile still launched the missile in the first place will leave them with the public image of -1. The group who kept its attack order will receive the image of -2 because they will be destroying so many of the countries. Keeping the missile attack from either of the groups will always lead to negative outcome because the secret Nuclear summit and the information about stage 1 will be revealed no matter what. The worst case is the (-2,-2) which is if both of the countries keep its’ attacks and the world finds out about it.
Sequential Game
To analyze a sequential game, we first constructed a game tree mapping out all of the possibilities then we followed the basic strategic rule. Looking at the game tree map, let us look ahead and reason back. First of all, the very last decision and assume that if it comes to the point where Asian countries have to make decision on rather to fire or not fire the nuclear warhead when European or Middle East countries decided to fire. The deciding player, Asian countries, will choose his or her optimal outcome that is the highest payoff or otherwise most desirable result of which in this case is to fire with the outcome of -1. Second, when assuming that the European or Middle East countries decided to do nothing with the existing nuclear warheads, Asian countries should fire since -1 is greater than -2. Now, let us back up to the first deciding player, European or Middle Countries assuming the next player would choose his or her best outcome. From here, we will treat the following decision as fixed because we have already decided what that second player will pick. When continuing this process of reasoning back in this way and having Asian countries’ best decision in mind, the final decision is that the European or Middle East countries should choose to fire because from (-1,1) and (-2,-1), -1 is better outcome to the European countries. Therefore, the rollback equilibrium of this sequential game between the European or Middle East countries and Asian countries is (-1,1).
Notice that this procedure assumes that the players are as smart as each other, and are doing the same analysis. While this may not be the case, it is the only safe assumption. If it is correct, we will have made our best possible decision. For it to be incorrect, an opponent must choose an option that is not in his or her own best interests. Also, notice that looking ahead and reasoning back determines not just one player’s optimal strategy, but those for all players. Once the solution has been determined, which in this case is for the European or Middle East countries to fire and the following Asian countries to fire as well, it is irrelevant whether or not the game is actually played, as no one can possibly do better than the solution dictates. Alternatively, one could argue that the player who gets to make the last decision wins. As this situation is determined as a sequential games, ultimately, there are only two choices: either the player with the last decision gets his or her best outcome, or the game is not played. Thus, the game tree obviates the need to actually play out the game.
Simultaneous Game
Both European/Middle East and Asian countries have decided to fire their nuclear weapons. Now, the United States cancel their nuclear warheads in the air. Unlike in the first sequential game, both European/Middle East and Asian countries play a simultaneous game without knowing the other player’s actions. In order to find the Nash Equilibrium, it is necessary to find the best outcome for the both players where they would not want to deviate their actions.
In the simultaneous game, figure 3, suppose EU chooses to cancel their nuclear weapons, Asian countries have two choice of cancelling and keeping theirs which gives the outcome of 0 and -2 respectively. Asian countries will also cancel since it gives higher output of 0. In case of EU choose to maintain their nuclear weapons, Asian countries are indifferent to any choices for both choices yield same output of -2.
On the other hand, looking at the game in perspective of European/Middle East countries, suppose Asian countries cancel, EU countries will choose to cancel for the outcome of 0 over -1 when they keep the weapons. However, if Asian countries do not cancel, EU countries end up with the same output of -2 whether they cancel the weapons or not. Thus, there are two Nash Equilibria, (Cancel, Cancel) and (Keep, Keep).
In this mixed strategy, assume the EU countries’ probability to cancel is (p) and (1-p) to keep the weapons, while the Asian countries’ probability to cancel is (q) and (1-q) to keep.

As shown in the calculations above, probabilities for both countries to cancel nuclear warheads are zero. According to the probabilities we have now, neither of players will disarm the missiles. However, if there is any possibility of larger than zero, both of the players will cancel the missiles since it gives higher outcome of (0,0) than (-2, -2) from keeping.

Name of Country Number of Nuclear Bomb
USA 7,315
India 90-110
Russia 8,000
France 300
North Korea…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

2012 Vice President Debate

...I belive, the Vice President Debate on Oct. 11, 2012, which was the Obama Admin. V.S. Romney Admin. Biden is almost always laughing over everything Ryan is saying, the war in iraq, which was the possiblity of nukes in iraq. the bringing of our troops back too america and all around the other country. the allowment the iraq military too handle there country against the taliban. the economy here in america, and the bills/taxes that are trying too get passed. the possiblity of a nuke war. biden laughing mostly thru the disscussion, ryan explaining.....that iraq is 4 years closer too making a nuclear bomb, biden saying that its not true, there only getting nuclear power for a “possible” nuke. i can see how iraq can get the material, maybe in this world, there’s something called a black market, which sells alot of stuff, its the opposing power who will do anything too gain power. another possability would be the kindness romney shows, that ryan explained of a family romney visited. it shows a kind-hearted side of romney. biden didnt say anything about obama. he does demand questions tho, biden. which is reasonable but i belive the republican party may have a better idea of what too do for the future of america, not its downfall. there’s another disscussion, the burning of the koran. that should america apologize for burning on kurans, and pissing on taliban bodie’s? of course, that is messed up like by far. but we should only apologize what we americans belive......

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Position Paper Non-Nuclear Proliferation in the Korean Peninsula

...constantly a threat to the international community and should immediately stop the testing and production of nuclear weapons. Goldschmidt, Pierre, "Major Challenges Currently Facing the International Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime." 9/26/03. IAEA ( Han, Yong-Sup Dr., "North Korea's Nuclear Weapons and Missile Development: Implications for Policy Options." National Defense University, Republic of Korea Agreed Framework Between the United States of America and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, 10/21/94. Geneva. IAEA, "IAEA Board of Governors Recommends Landmark Budget Increase - Press Release". 2003. Steven Aftergood and Hans M. Kristensen. 11/16/06 <>. Robert S. Norris and Hans M. Kristensen, “NRDC Nuclear Notebook: Global Nuclear Stockpiles, 1945-2002.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. November/December 2002. Lee, Matthew Russell. UN. 04/09/06 <>....

Words: 746 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Research Doc

...Legal Dictionary, is a term used to describe the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons-applicable nuclear technology and information. United States- Territories and her allies Contention 1: The threat of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of rogue states and terrorists increases as more countries possess them. Example A: Selling to militant groups and/or countries with intentions to use nuclear weapons. Starting in the 1970s, Pakistan used extensive clandestine procurement networks to get technology for its own nuclear weapons program. Former Pakistani nuclear scientist A. Q. Khan directed the procurement [of Pakistani nukes] and used a similar network [as used to obtain Pakistani nuclear information] to supply Libya, North Korea, and Iran with designs and materials related to uranium enrichment for profit.( This is an example of what happens when action is not taken against the countries who are in possession of nuclear technology, whether they are showing signs of imminent threat or not. Every time nuclear information is distributed it increases the number of people receiving that information, in turn causing nuclear proliferation. The United States is justified to prevent this action that causes proliferation because the mere existence of nuclear technology poses a threat to United States citizens. Example B: We cannot wait to be attacked on a nuclear scale, therefore preemptive measures are justified. If the......

Words: 679 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

If Poison Gas Can Go

...If Poison Gas Can Go, Why Not Nukes? Summary James Carroll’s “If Poison Gas Can Go, Why Not Nukes?” is a rally for readers to support the elimination of nuclear weapons from acceptable military arsenal just like poison gas was banned. The author believes that just like chemical weapons were developed, used successfully in war and eventually abandoned so will nuclear weapons. Carroll believes that nuclear weapons are dangerous and can be used for enormous destruction. The author builds his arguments from a historical perspective. At the beginning of the 20th century when scientists were experimenting with new weapon technology, “poisonous weapons” were developed (Carroll 1). The world reacted by outlawing these weapons through the Hague Convention in 1907. However, this did not stop countries from developing and using chemical weapons in war. Germany and Britain used asphyxiating gas in World War I. While there were less than 100,000 casualties fewer than the millions cause by conventional military weapons, the chemical weapons still cause great concern in Europe. The author identifies a group of people he terms as “realists”. They represent strong opposition against the banning of effective military weapons. The realists were opposed to the abolition of the use of military weapons in the 1900s and are also against the abandonment of nuclear armament. The realists’ main argument is that nowhere in history have effective weapons been abandoned because the......

Words: 1223 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...The U. S. A. and the Soviet Union are vying with each other in testing and producing nuclear weapons. China too has recently entered the race. These facts, together with the mounting rivalry and tension between the two Power Blocs, give rise to the fear that the world is perilously on the brink of a nuclear war. The horrors of a nuclear war are unimaginable. We may have some idea of them by recalling the havoc caused by the dropping of the atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki towards the end of the Second World War. Not only were the two cities wiped out of existence but the atmosphere for miles around was polluted and people there fell victims to strange diseases. The destruction of entire cities and sudden deaths of millions of civilians caused by nuclear weapons are shocking enough. But what is more shocking, though it is not adequately realised by laymen, is the disastrous effect of the use of such weapons on the survivors and their unborn children. The radioactive fallout spreads for miles around and causes untold harm to millions of innocent people. The radiation produced by the splitting of the atom causes mysterious diseases and leads to the birth of defective children. In fact, the fall-out from the nuclear tests and explosions in Siberia and the Pacific has already caused a lot of harm, though the Great Powers carrying out these experiments may not admit it. It is known, for example, that nuclear test made some years ago on the distant Marshall Islands......

Words: 592 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Nuke Enrgy

...Introduction 1. [pp: 2Albert]Albert Einstein once said: “The release of atomic energy has not created a new problem. It has merely made more urgent the necessity of solving an existing one.” 2. Nuclear power is a source of energy that occurs when a neutron is launched at an unstable atom like uranium or plutonium. A cool fact about nuclear power is that it is a scientific discovery that was funded by the military. The US called it the Manhattan project. The project existed during WWII to create a bomb that would scare the world into peace Nuclear power is used in many ways to create power and to this there are many advantages and disadvantages, there are even some accidents but in the end there are more pros than there are cons. We talk about clean energy and most of you think of water or wind power, but there are some big drawbacks to these that nobody seems to ever discuss. Body I. What it’s used for [pp: 2Einstein]Nuclear energy is used to make power for many things. Many countries such as France and Japan have already changed most of their power to nuclear power and minimized the amount of fossil fuel used to create power. Many of the major navies in the world use this as a way to dominate the seas. The main reason that we don’t want to use fossil fuel is that it creates green house gases that may or may not be causing global warming but they do cause pollution in their immediate area with sulfur and other toxic......

Words: 1824 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...The States concluding this Treaty, hereinafter referred to as the "Parties to the Treaty", Considering the devastation that would be visited upon all mankind by a nuclear war and the consequent need to make every effort to avert the danger of such a war and to take measures to safeguard the security of peoples, Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously enhance the danger of nuclear war, In conformity with resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly calling for the conclusion of an agreement on the prevention of wider dissemination of nuclear weapons, Undertaking to cooperate in facilitating the application of International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards on peaceful nuclear activities, Expressing their support for research, development and other efforts to further the application, within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards system, of the principle of safeguarding effectively the flow of source and special fissionable materials by use of instruments and other techniques at certain strategic points, Affirming the principle that the benefits of peaceful applications of nuclear technology, including any technological by-products which may be derived by nuclear-weapon States from the development of nuclear explosive devices, should be available for peaceful purposes to all Parties of the Treaty, whether nuclear-weapon or non-nuclear weapon States, Convinced that, in furtherance of this principle, all Parties to...

Words: 2255 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Know Nukes Now

...Running head: ELEPHANTS Elephants Student’s name SPC 1608 Brigette Robinson Pensacola State College Introduction: I. According to, status an estimated 100 African Elephants are killed each day by poachers seeking ivory, meat and body parts. II. My name is __________, and I would like to talk to you today about different types of elephants. III. There are two different types of elephants, African and Asian. They both have similarities and differences. IV. Today I will inform you about elephants and why they are endangered, which species is at more risk than the other, and the language used by this incredible species. Body: I. The years 2011 and 2012 indicate the worst record for elephant poaching in Africa; Tens of thousands of elephants were slaughtered (“National Geographic”, n.d.). a. In 2011 the highest number of illegal ivory seizures in the last 23 years was recorded. i. Ivory is the number one reason that elephants are killed. ii. Their meat and body parts are among the other top reasons elephants are hunted. b. Poaching is an illegal act. Now that we know about elephant poaching, let’s take a look at an endangered species of elephants. II. The most endangered of the species is the Asian elephant. c. Asian elephant’s habitat ranges over 14 countries across Asia. iii. Wild Asian elephants suffer severe habitat loss in some of the most densely human......

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...American machine could bust into Iranian systems and shut down all that country’s nuclear activity in an instant. It’s like a game of rock-paper-scissors: Nukes might be the world’s version of a rock, but quantum computers would be paper, winning every time. And yet, quantum computing research isn’t self-contained and secretive in the manner of the Los Alamos atomic bomb work during World War II. Some of it is academic work at universities such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, with findings shared in scientific papers. Technology companies are working on this, too, since these things have the potential to be business nukes. IBM, Google and Microsoft all fund research. Imagine if Google gets one before Microsoft. That pesky Bing could wind up vaporized. Google has a Quantum Artificial Intelligence unit working with the University of California, Santa Barbara, with a goal of developing a quantum machine that can learn. Meanwhile, a Canadian startup, D-Wave Systems, is partially funded by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos—and the CIA. The very secretive and often controversial company is already marketing a hybrid machine that seems to be a traditional silicon computer with some sort of quantum turbo thruster. There’s no telling, yet, how this technology will emerge, or whether it will be hoarded by a few nations (like nukes) or spread around the globe (like computers). “There’s a healthy mix of cooperation and competition,” IBM quantum computing scientist Jerry Chow......

Words: 801 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Arms Race

... The Arms Race Arsenal A-Bomb (US 1945, USSR 1949) H-Bomb (US 1952, USSR 1953) ICBM (US 1957, USSR 1958) 1957 : USSR launch first satellite “Sputnik”into space. “Missile Gap” paranoia in USA ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missiles intercept & destroy nukes in theory)(USSR 1968, USA 1972) MIRV (USA 1970, USSR 1975) -Stockpiling of nuclear weapons seen as necessary by both parties -Technological advances made both USA & USSR feel vulnerable -Secrecy, need to catch up or to be one step ahead = fuelled arms race -This (building increasingly powerful & sophisticated weapons) continued until 1980s Key Ideas : Nuclear weapons have crucial impact on US foreign policy during Cold War : -gave rise to arms race (essential feature of CW, maintains CW hostility) -revolutionized military strategy -imposed great economic strain (hence end of CW? Debatable) Brodie (1946) “The Absolute Weapon” Main idea : before nukes the purpose of military = win wars after nukes the purpose of military = avoid wars Military victory in total war impossible for either side US Presidents develop different strategies on what to do with their nuclear arsenal Eisenhower & “Massive Retaliation” = the US will use every weapon if attacked, despite the consequences = the threat of an all-out nuclear war used to make sure it wouldn’t happen ? Kennedy & “Flexible Response” =exploring wider options beyond military forces Sec of State McNamara’s belief in possibility of limited, controlled and rational ...

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Impact of Nukes on War what “deters” powerful nations from going to war. If one observes the events during the cold war, it is clear that the United States and Soviet Union were at odds, and during a different time, would probably have fought. In the case of the cold war, neither side could justify the outcome of all-out war despite their clear and apparent problems. This is influenced by what is known as second strike capability. Many of the powerful nations that have waged war against each other in the past have nuclear arsenals. If country A launched nukes at country B, country B would fire back. As a result, more conflicts have been resolved through diplomacy and non-violence. States also risk putting civilians in direct danger, as destruction of the state and population is assured, even if the conflict is overseas. By observing events like the Cold War, it’s clear that international politics has changed. Second strike capabilities and the ramifications of nukes are far too great of a risk to justify all out wars between major powers. This mutually assured destruction encourages parties to find alternatives to conflict....

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The One

...example of a classicist approach because Ray had a defined goal, which was to build the baseball field, but while working towards that goal he ran into a lot of obstacles and struggles which made it hard to accomplish. Bull Durham also uses a classicist approach through the character Crash. Crash was a minor league veteran whose career was coming to an end due to age. During his last season with the Durham Bulls Crash was assigned to “coach” young pitching stud Nuke Laloosh in preparation for the big leagues. Crash was very irritated by his new role with the bulls and had a hard time realizing that his career was coming to an end due to his pride. As the story moves on Crash becomes attracted to Annie who at the time was involved with Nuke. The classicist approach I took out of this scenario was that Crash was using Annie a new passion he had found in life to help him guide his way out of baseball and start a new life with different priorities. Nuke was the only thing standing in Crashes way and that was solved once Nuke was elected to the show, due to Crashes help and coaching. After screening Field of Dreams and Bull Durham both movies about baseball, it is very evident how a director uses the different aspects of film theory to portray his overall message of the film. Some may use more of a realist approach like in Bull Durham, which describes real life in the minors and the struggle to make it to the next level. While others may take more of a formalistic approach and......

Words: 1632 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Field of Bull

...example of a classicist approach because Ray had a defined goal, which was to build the baseball field, but while working towards that goal he ran into a lot of obstacles and struggles which made it hard to accomplish. Bull Durham also uses a classicist approach through the character Crash. Crash was a minor league veteran whose career was coming to an end due to age. During his last season with the Durham Bulls Crash was assigned to “coach” young pitching stud Nuke Laloosh in preparation for the big leagues. Crash was very irritated by his new role with the bulls and had a hard time realizing that his career was coming to an end due to his pride. As the story moves on Crash becomes attracted to Annie who at the time was involved with Nuke. The classicist approach I took out of this scenario was that Crash was using Annie a new passion he had found in life to help him guide his way out of baseball and start a new life with different priorities. Nuke was the only thing standing in Crashes way and that was solved once Nuke was elected to the show, due to Crashes help and coaching. After screening Field of Dreams and Bull Durham both movies about baseball, it is very evident how a director uses the different aspects of film theory to portray his overall message of the film. Some may use more of a realist approach like in Bull Durham, which describes real life in the minors and the struggle to make it to the next level. While others may take more of a formalistic approach and......

Words: 1632 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Japan Secret Weapons

...During WW2, Japan had one of the most terrifying weapons at sea and on land. They had Kamikazes, people who killed themselves while doing damage to troops or ships. Hearing BANZI in the jungle was something that scared many Allie troops. Although this was the most famous Japanese tactic in the war there were other types of weapons that many people have yet to hear about even after 50 years after the war. These weapons include the unmanned fire balloons, Kamikaze subs, and the dirty nuke they almost had. The Japanese launched balloons while they were being pushed back into a “minimum defense area. Their main purpose was to set fire to farms, cities, and forests and carried anti personnel and fire bombs. In theory, the bombs could do major damage due to the forests on the west coast. The effect would be devastating due to the fact that Americans on the main land weren’t touched and weren’t expecting to be touched by the war like British and French cities and towns. 200 were released, but none made it to America. The Japanese remodeled the balloons and launched another wave After MacArthur captured the Philippines. These balloons were estimated to reach America in 4 days. And it took Americans 4 days to find out about the balloons. On the 4th of November a navel patrol ship found one of the balloons in the ocean. They tried to bring it on board but it sank with its payload. The FBI were called in and America was in high alert. 2 weeks later a balloon was found in Montana......

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Free Essay


...Lions, Elephants and Alligators into Animal Kings: Grantlinkspence Win the Game: HOME RUN Lose the Game: HARI KARI Resign: RESIGN 1000 Food Bonus: PEPPERONI PIZZA 1000 Gold Bonus: COINAGE 1000 Stone Bonus: QUARRY 1000 Wood Bonus: WOODSTOCK Accelerates your Chariot Archers: UPSIDFLINTMOBILE All Enemy Units Die: DIEDIEDIE Kill Player X: KILLX Priests are Faster and Stronger: HOYOHOYO Removes the Fog of War: NO FOG Reveals the Map: REVEAL MAP Buildings and Units are Created Instantly: STEROIDS Black Sports Car with a Rocket Launcher: BIGDADDY Create a Man in a White Suit with a Quick-firing Laser Gun: PHOTON MAN Creates a Man in a White Suit with a slow-firing Nuke Gun: E=MC2 TROOPER Gives you Control over Nature (but lose control over your own civilization): GAIA St. Francis Unit that resembles Priest but can summon lightning when close enough to opponent: CONVERT THIS! Summons a Baby on a Tricycle with a Musket: POW Turns Heavy Catapults into Big Berthas: BIG BERTHA Turns Horse Archers into Black Riders: BLACK RIDER White Sports Car with a Roket Launcer: BIG MOMMA Your Ballistas and Helepolis have a 99+1 Range: ICBM Your Catapults and Stone Throwers Fire Villagers, Cows, etc: JACK BE NIMBLE Upgrade your Catapult Tiremes/Juggernauts into Flying Dutchmen: FLYING DUTCHMAN Turns a Bowman into a Composite Bowman which turns into a tree when not......

Words: 571 - Pages: 3