Premium Essay

Prespective at the Marxist Theory

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Calindy
Words 1195
Pages 5
INTRODUCTION
Is capitalism really man's enemy or is man his own enemy? I believe capitalism can be used as a very effective and productive tool but it must be used with caution for it can be very deadly. Capitalism has the power to eradicate poverty and at the same time has the power to destroy humanity within a blink of an eye. It is therefore a wise leader who will see the need for the inclusive capitalism as opposed to the real-world capitalist system.
One of the greatest businessmen of the world, Bill Gates once said; "You know, Capitalism is this wonderful thing that motivates people, it causes wonderful inventories to be done. But in this area of disease of the world at large ,it has really let us down." -(www.brainyqoutes.com)
While agreeing to this, Mahatma Ghandi said; "Capitalist as such is not evil; it is its wrong use that is evil"-[Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi (1869-1948)]
REAL WORLD CAPITALISM VS INCLUSIVE CAPITALISM
While an inclusive and desirable economy will strive to keep all the stakeholders happy and satisfied, the real world capitalism shall have inequality, waste, starvation, undemocratic, war and dictatorship just to mention a few. The inclusive capitalism economy will try to make the employees comfortable and will likely use the people-oriented leadership style are the democratic leadership style just to ensure its employees are free to voice out their opinions unlike in the real-world where the voice of the poor in oppressed. The real world economy is follows a marxist paradigm very cruel to the poor for their voice is not heard and is overpowered by the rich and powerful it brings about;

INEQUALITY
Even though they are dependent on each other despite the big gap between them, employees and employers would not survive without each other, that is, the rich cannot exist without the poor for they are the source of production…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Historical Prespective Theory Paper Nur/518

...practice based on research evidence.” (Polit & Tatano, 2012) Stetler’s Model is both the positivism and constructivism paradigm. Evidence based research cannot do without either paradigm. Both can and are used for evidence based research. Positivism assumes that the world is measurable, and can be studied (Polit & Tatano, 2012) . An example being; a patient has deep vein thrombosis, through the positivism paradigm view point the underlying causes would be identified. The constructivism paradigm is a more holistic, naturalistic approach viewing the patient in a subjective way. Both are used in evidence based research. Positivism deduces the process based on specific concrete concepts while constructivism is an inductive process and theory generated with emphasis on holistic, subjective, and non-quantifiable entities within the research. (Polit & Tatano, 2012)   References Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding Nursing Research (5th ed.). Maryland Heights, MO: Suanders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.. Polit, D., & Tatano, C. (2012). Generating And Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott...

Words: 518 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Feminism and the Marxist Theory in the Hunger Games

...character with fearlessness, intelligence, and on a mission for survival. Different from the other Tributes, Katniss kills in means of self-defense. Katniss is not only fighting for survival but for fairness and justice as well within the social classes and political power. This character fights for what she believes is right in order to end the class struggle of the Districts and the Capitol. The Feminist views of Katniss make her unique because she is not portrayed as a sex object but as a tough action heroine who fights for what she believes in on her way to victory in an attempt to end the class struggle of the rich vs. poor in her society would also provoke a Marxist reading of the Hunger Games. The brilliant mind behind the Marxist theory was a man by the name of Karl Marx, He was a German philosopher. His theories about society, economics, and politics are known as Marxism. Marxism is a conflict between an ownership class that controls production and a proletariat that provides the labor for production. According to Karl Marx, “all humans are creative active beings. But under capitalism, workers’ life energy, their creative power, is alienated from them in the course of the labor process. In such alienation, their life energy is take out of them and turned into a thing, a manufactured good or a value that is then sold on the market as a commodity.” (Ryan 59) In our society the separation between the rich and the poor is one that is still plausible. An event that......

Words: 1847 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Marxist Theory of State, and How It Might Be Criticised

...ESSAY – ‘What is the Marxist theory of the state and how might it be criticised?’ Introduction Marxism first arose in 1987 when Marx and Engels were commissioned to write the manifesto for the political party of radical workers, The Communist League; this political party was formed in order to create a unity of the ‘working men’, in favour of the creation of a classless society. The purpose of The Communist Manifesto, and much of Marx’s early writings on the state, was to promote social change, in refutation to Hegel’s theory of the dialetic. This is achieved through the construction of a materialist interpretation of the state as ‘the active, conscious and official expression (of) the present structure of society' (Collected Works, 3, p. 199). Marx’s ultimate aim was to “lay bare the economic law of motion of modern society.” (Marx, Capital [1867] 1965, p10), which is to… This essay will explain and analyse Marx’s theory of state, a nd assess the legitimacy of the theory through criticisms. Marx’s theory of history/state: History is a study of past events in human affairs; Marx believes that historical events are driven forward by changing economic factors within the ‘base’ of society. According to Marx, human society is made up of two measures: a base and a superstructure. The superstructure is the set of 'non-economic institutions whose character is explained by the nature of the economic structure (the base).' (G. A. Cohen Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence pp......

Words: 1749 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Evaluate the Usefulness of Marxist Theory to Our Understanding of Crime and Deviance

...Marxist explanations of crime and deviance, like their work on other areas like the family and education, rest on an economic and structural analysis of society that sees a class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. This struggle comprises the attempts by the proletariat to free themselves from the domination of the bourgeoisie as they seek to take over the means of production. David Gordon argues that crime is an inevitable product of capitalism and the inequality that it generates. He argues that inequalities in wealth and income create poverty and homelessness for the working class and crime is a rational response to these problems. This idea is supported by research which shows property crime rising during recession. Gordon suggests capitalism encourages values such as greed and materialism which are conducive to all classes committing crime. Such values promote non-economic crimes such as violence, rape, child abuse, vandalism and hooliganism because inequalities in wealth and power lead to frustration, hostility, envy and alienation for some members of the working class who may commit crime in an attempt to retrieve power and status. This theory argues that it is surprising that there is not more working class crime. The idea explained is one of continual conflict and of crime being a continuation or extension of the class battle. However, critics point out that such a view is a bit sweeping, and that the whole of the working class isn’t in revolt...

Words: 1166 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Marxist Theory

...Marxist Theory Marxist stems from conflict theory that concentrates on social class, distinct by the relationship of a group to the means of production. This perspective claims that capitalists, who own and control the means of production, use the law to protect their property from people who threaten it like the lower or working class. Marx believed that throughout history, human societies have consisted of two classes: those who have power to create the rules everyone has to live under and those who neither resources nor the political power to have a say what those rules will be. Examples of these economic or political systems are lord versus serf, capitalist versus proletariat and master versus slave. The capitalists are those who own means of production and the proletariats are those who work for them. Crime of the wealthy and powerful is attributed to the greed generated by capitalist economic system, and crime by the powerless is attributed to the need violate the law in order to survive. Marxist asserts the relationship between capitalism and crime, but they offer little evidence that capitalism generates crime to a greater degree than alternative economic systems, such as socialism. Marx used a base structure metaphor to describe the role of social institutions, with the economic mode of production providing the base of that structure. For Marx, the mode of production determines the characteristics of other social institutions, examples the social, political,......

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Pride and Prejudice: Marxist Theory

...27 January 2014 Pride and Prejudice: Marxist Theory Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen illustrates how money shapes the attitude and the behavior of people. The main idea that Jane Austen presents is the Marxist Theory. This theory states that the underlying reason for . Elizabeth Bennet, the protagonist of the story, faces many characters who believe that money is the underlying factor to which someone should marry. A main example of this is Elizabeth’s mother Mrs. Bennet, who in fact believes that all of her daughters should get married, however marriage is not entirely about true love; Mrs. Bennet’s view on marriage is that her daughters should chase after a man who have great wealth. Throughout the book, Jane Austen consistently shows the upper class looking down toward the middle class, which is fairly ironic for the fact that they are not that poor if they are considered to be middle class. To continue, Jane Austen’s portrayal of, not all but quite a few, wealthy characters summarize the main theme of the novel, which is the power of societal reputation and money. In Pride and Prejudice nothing was further stressed than having economic power, money, and marriage. The first quote, “It is truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.” (Austen 1) establishes what type of book this is going to be. Right out of the gate this quotation introduces the importance of economic power; this also shows the......

Words: 845 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess the Usefulness of Marxist Theory for an Understanding of the Family

...Marxism is the study of capitalist societies. The theory first came from the German sociologist Karl Marx. Marxist theory mainly studied the nuclear family (N.F). The definition of the nuclear family consists of a mother, father and their dependent children. Marx believed within the capital society there were two types of social classes the ruling class (bourgeoisie) and the working class (proletariat). His theory was the proletariat own nothing and the bourgeoisie owned all the means of production. Friedrich Engels was also a father of Marxist theory alongside Karl Marx. In 1884 Engels believed several theories of the functions of the N.F. It was to allow husbands to control their wives and this was to ensure the paternity of the sons. Therefore, wealth can be kept in the hands of bourgeoisie families (the ruling class) through inheritance from father to son. This is useful that he identifies the male superior towards the in the N.F and the importance functionalists believe of reproduction to keep the wealth within the family. Also shows the functionalists theory of the economic function of the family to be kept in the family showing the unfair advantage the bourgeoisie had on the proletariat. Eli Zaretsky in 1976 said the N.F reproduces the next generation of workers and it consumes the good of capitalism. It acts as a safety net for male frustration created by work. Zaretsky identifies the usefulness of the N.F giving an understanding of the dominating roles with......

Words: 597 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Marxist Feminist Theory

...The objective of this paper is to evaluate why women are committing crime by using Marxist Feminist Theory. Marxist theory was that women commit crime due to capitalism and because of capitalism women feel oppressed and unequal in society. Marxist Feminist Theory Marxist Feminist theory is laid out by Friedrich Engels. Engels explains that a woman's subordinate role is not due to her biological disposition , but to her social relations. A big part of a woman's subordination is the role of a man in society and how a man controls the labor of woman and their sexual life in the home. Woman have to be subordinate in their families and must be submissive to their husbands. Gender oppression and class oppression and the relationship between and man and women in society is similar to Marxist feminist view on a capitalist society. In a capitalist society a woman' s subordinate role comes from class oppression because it is in the interest of the ruling class. Men and women are divided and different privileges while men get paid for their jobs women do not get paid for theirs( childrearing, cleaning, cooking, etc..). Men are taught by society to become dominant to the roles that have been handed to them. Understanding Why Women Commit Crime Woman murder rates have rose by eleven percent a year since the seventies. What started at six thousand in the seventies jumped to seventy-five thousand and this number is increasing. Some possible explanations for these crimes can be......

Words: 661 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Critical Prespective on Organization Theory Postmodernism, Realism, and Complexity

...Critical perspectives on organisation theory Postmodernism, Realism and Complexity Learning objectives * Diskusikan kontribusi Postmodernisme (PM) teori organisasi. * Sebutkan kekuatan dan kelemahan dari PM. * Memahami prinsip utama realis perspektif. Jelaskan pengaruh teori kompleksitas pada pemahaman kita tentang organisasi dan yang (dari kompleksitas) keuntungan utama dan kerugian * Menghargai keterbatasan pendekatan rasional untuk organisasi. * Memahami bagaimana PM, realisme dan kompleksitas memperluas cakupan untuk pilihan organisasi. POSTMODERNISM Postmodernisme adalah suatu pergerakan ide yang menggantikan ide-ide zaman modern. Zaman modern dicirikan dengan pengutamaan rasio, objektivitas, totalitas, strukturalisasi/sistematisasi, universalisasi tunggal dan kemajuan saints. Postmodern memiliki ide cita-cita, ingin meningkatkan kondisi sosial, budaya dan kesadaran akan semua realitas serta perkembangan dalam berbagai bidang. Postmodern mengkritik modernisme yang dianggap telah menyebabkan sentralisasi dan universalisasi ide di berbagai bidang ilmu dan teknologi, dengan pengaruhnya yang mencengkram kokoh dalam bentuknya globalisasi dunia. Definisi dari Post Modernisme 1. Postmodernisme adalah lawan dari modernisme yang dianggap tidak berhasil mengangkat martabat manusia modern (Lyotard). 2. Postmodernisme adalah pengembangan dari modernitas (Jameson, dengan alasan tidak mungkin kita dapat masuk jenjang postmodernisme......

Words: 2252 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Evaluate the Marxist Theory of Religion and Its Relevance to Todays Society.

...Evaluate the Marxist theory of religion and its relevance to society today. Marxists believe that the ruling class use instruments in society to control the working class – for example religion and education. They argue that religion is created and promoted by the Ruling Class in order to pass on their dominant ideology to the working class, using it as an “instrument”. Althusser argues that the ruling class do this through physical control such as the police and the justice system (Repressive State Apparatus), they also control the working class through the Ideological state Apparatus, which via religion, prevents the working class from becoming deviant and rebelling. A clear demonstration of this is in Christian teaching. They’re taught that Jesus himself had a day job as a carpenter – which is a manual labour, working class job. This idea of Jesus being like us civilians appeals to the working class as their attitude would be that if someone of such major influence can have that job, I can too because I will be repaid in the afterlife. Another supporting piece of evidence to the Marxist theory of religion is in the Jewish Torah (Old Testament – 34:12) God says “Six days thou shalt work, but on the seventh day thou shalt rest, in eanring time and in harvesting, thou shalt rest”. This also influences the working class not to question why we have to work for 6 days, because when we make our earnings we can rest on the seventh day, whilst the ruling class impose this......

Words: 1058 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Marxist Theory on Pride and Prejudice

...I would add that any Marxist reading of the book would also necessarily consider Marx's concept of alienation. Marx saw alienation as a basic estrangement of the individual, as a person, from his role in society. In a capitalist society, according to Marx, the worker, who actually through his labor produces wealth, is nevertheless alienated from the thing that he produces, since the capitalist owns the means of production. The worker is only a cog in the capitalist machine. Characters like Lady Catherine or Mr Darcy might seem at first to have little to do with the production of wealth; in fact, the definition of a "gentleman" is someone who lives off the labor of others. However, in my view Darcy and the rest are as much victims of capitalist alienation, as much "cogs in the machine," as any worker. By this I mean not only the property law that would strip Mr Bennet of his estate on his death, but the rigid social rules that determine rank and subordinate personal values or inclination to status and money. Almost every character in the book is reified in this way, that is, their identity as a person is replaced, or erased, by their position in society, as determined by their wealth. One possible avenue such a Marxist reading could pursue would be to examine the attitudes of characters to this social hegemony. Charlotte, for example, makes a calculated choice in marrying Mr Collins in order to obtain her own home and some measure of independence. Bingley is another......

Words: 502 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Outline and Asses Marxist Theories on Social Inequalities.

...Outline and asses marxist theories on social inequalities. Marxism is a political, social, and economic philosophy derived from the work of the 19th-century historians Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. It views human history as a struggle between social classes and asserts that capitalism is inherently exploitative. According to Marxism, social inequality is an unfair situation, in which some individuals or groups have more money, influence and power etc over others, usually referring to the bourgeoisie, who use this advantage to oppress the proletariats. Marxists would argue that social inequality is caused by false class consciousness, and that eventually would lead to a revaluation. Marxism is a conflict theory, focusing on inequalities and divisions within society. According to Karl Marx, all stratified societies have two major classes, the bourgeoisie (rich) and the proletariats (poor). The rich owns the means of production, such as land capital, machinery etc, while the poor does not, this gives the ruling class the power to exploit the lower class, through the use of the superstructure, e.g. the legal and political system to justify their actions and maintain social order, due to the fact that the ruling class have more influence compared to the working class. According to Karl Marx, the rich exploits the working class who have to sell their labour to survive, thus creating huge inequalities, furthermore, due to the fact that many working class people rely on......

Words: 1090 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Marxist Theory Pride and Prejudice

...Pride and Prejudice: Marxist Theory 27 January 2014 Pride and Prejudice: Marxist Theory Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen illustrates how money shapes the attitude and the behavior of people. The main idea that Jane Austen presents is the Marxist Theory. This theory states that the underlying reason for . Elizabeth Bennet, the protagonist of the story, faces many characters who believe that money is the underlying factor to which someone should marry. A main example of this is Elizabeth’s mother Mrs. Bennet, who in fact believes that all of her daughters should get married, however marriage is not entirely about true love; Mrs. Bennet’s view on marriage is that her daughters should chase after a man who have great wealth. Throughout the book, Jane Austen consistently shows the upper class looking down toward the middle class, which is fairly ironic for the fact that they are not that poor if they are considered to be middle class. To continue, Jane Austen’s portrayal of, not all but quite a few, wealthy characters summarize the main theme of the novel, which is the power of societal reputation and money. In Pride and Prejudice nothing was further stressed than having economic power, money, and marriage. The first quote, “It is truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.” (Austen 1) establishes what type of book this is going to be. Right out of the gate this quotation introduces the importance of......

Words: 336 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Pride and Prejudice: Marxist Theory

...Pride and Prejudice: Marxist Theory Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen illustrates how money shapes the attitude and the behavior of people. The main idea that Jane Austen presents is the Marxist Theory. This theory states that the underlying reason for . Elizabeth Bennet, the protagonist of the story, faces many characters who believe that money is the underlying factor to which someone should marry. A main example of this is Elizabeth’s mother Mrs. Bennet, who in fact believes that all of her daughters should get married, however marriage is not entirely about true love; Mrs. Bennet’s view on marriage is that her daughters should chase after a man who have great wealth. Throughout the book, Jane Austen consistently shows the upper class looking down toward the middle class, which is fairly ironic for the fact that they are not that poor if they are considered to be middle class. To continue, Jane Austen’s portrayal of, not all but quite a few, wealthy characters summarize the main theme of the novel, which is the power of societal reputation and money. In Pride and Prejudice nothing was further stressed than having economic power, money, and marriage. The first quote, “It is truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife.” (Austen 1) establishes what type of book this is going to be. Right out of the gate this quotation introduces the importance of economic power; this also shows the reader(s) that this is......

Words: 331 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Assess Marxist Theories

...that all exploitation and private ownership would be abolished. Marx has however been criticised for having a simple, one-dimensional view of inequality- he sees class as the only important division. Weber argues that status and power difference are more important sources of inequality, independently of class. Feminists argue that gender is a much more important source of inequality. Marx model has also been criticised as being too simplistic, he identifies only two classes, when in fact there is a middle class of doctors and teachers, who he completely ignores. Marx ideas have also been criticised as being too deterministic. He argues that there is a one way relationship between the economic base and societal superstructure. Humanistic Marxists such as Gramsci would argue that there is a two way relationship between the economic base and the societal superstructure. Gramsci argues that of course capitalism controls society and the proletariat are being oppressed because of it, however it's not as black and white as Marx thought. Gramsci argues that people can shape the societal superstructure as well, however the economic base has more power to shape society. Gramsci introduces the concept of hegemony, or ideological and moral leadership of society, to explain how the ruling class maintain its position. He argues that the proletariat must develop their own ‘counter-hegemony’ to win the leadership of society from the bourgeoisie. Gramsci sees the ruling class maintaining......

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5