Free Essay

Military Spending

In: Social Issues

Submitted By lizayang
Words 1621
Pages 7
Should Government Limit the Military Spending?

There is a product, each country only have one. To buy it, everybody in this country should dig their pocket. This product is named military spending. With the large amounts of research and the development of high technology weapons, regional warming of local wars, armed conflicts, and intensified arms race, the series of a new arms race, military deployment and new high-growth military spending boost are being performed on the international stage. However, governments are concerned about seeking “peace via war”. As the arms trade is the major cause of suffering for human beings, governments should limit their military spending; nobody in the world wants war.

Under such rhetoric combined with powerful lobbying of the military industries, governments are intentionally aiding military, because the military spending is an important indicator to reflect the dimension of a country’s military strength, and also a major factor of the military strength. As it is a serious issue in the world and so important for every country, every country values this issue as a primary one and pay special attention on it. As each country has different situation and government systems, there are different views towards military spending. Some people suggest increasing the military spending while some people suggest governments to cut the military spending.

Some people think that government should keep increasing the military spending, the reasons are as following. The first reason is to better defend the country’s territorial integrity and non-violation by other countries, and to create a peaceful and stable environment for the state which is an indispensable condition for economic development. For example, in Middle East, the military spending is an important factor that affects the peace among those countries. According to the article “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Will Lead to Greater Stability,” “the success of Israel’s peace with Egypt and Jordan is heavily dependent on American military aid to Egypt.” Since they have a relative balance on their military, the conflicts between them will decrease, because nobody wants conflict under a balance of strength situation, and it is hard to predict who will win in the conflict and whether the benefit is greater than the deficit (Brookes).

Second, most people will think that the more military they have, the higher defense of the government has because in their mind, defense is an obligation, not an option. For example, some people suggest that the government should not cut the military spending; they believe that if they have weapons of a huge amount and high quality, they will feel safer. As cited in the article “Don’t Cut Military Spending,” “national defense is a higher priority than other areas of federal activity,” the national defense is the most important part of a country and is also important to the people who lived in this country. (Talent) The government cutting the military spending is the same as cutting their security. Although, the theme of the world is peace, if the country is of less strength in military, then it will bullied by other countries.

Third, increasing military spending will lead to an arms trade, and the arms trade is the biggest interest in the world. Such as America, is the biggest arms seller in the world, the money it gains by arms trade is unaccountable. The United government can use the money to develop the technology, economy and the education. That is also an important reason for America to become a super power in the world, so increasing military spending is also good for the development of the economy.

Although there are many people who suggest do not cutting the military spending, still some people strongly suggest that the governments to cut the military spending. The most important reason may be that the increase of military will lead to an arms race among countries and increase insecurity. As the more powerful countries show less commitment in reducing their own arms substantially and continue to pursue their own national interests, they affect many others around the world, such as in the Middle East, as arms race is increasing, there is an arms trade spread out in Middle East, but it makes this area more unstable. As cited in the article “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Could Lead to a Dangerous Arms Race,” “Middle Eastern states are taking steps to shore up their security.” So the Middle Eastern states are keeping buying weapons from the developed countries. Such as Russia, Britain, the US, and also several developing countries as China, North Korea, these countries are the players of the arms race in Middle Eastern states; they are selling weapons to them that make this area more instable.

The second reason is the more military spending a government have the more possible it is to have unchecked arms trade. There is a misunderstanding of the military spending; the more they spend on military the more safety they will gain. Every country wants higher security so they seek more arms trade to buy more military to increase the level of security and military strength. Then there will be more unchecked arms trade occurred. As a result of unchecked arms trade, the country will more easily be involved in a conflict. As cited in the article “Unchecked Arms Trade Fuelling Conflict, Poverty,” “if a country is likely to be involved in warfare, then it is unjustifiable to sell arms. There must be regulation or control of arms especially when the countries that are buying them are involved in a conflict.” (Karlsson) Furthermore, due to the unchecked arms trade, weapons are easily to get into the wrong hands which are dangerous for people’s security, such as terrorisms, because as cited in the article “Arms Trade,” “the prospect for greater security worldwide is greatly enhanced when weapons do not fall into the wrong hands.”

The third reason is increase military will increase the danger of the world. The world’s theme is peace, but the arms trade- side effect of military spending is a major suffering of human beings. We don’t need weapons in a peaceful world. According to “The US Should Cut Military Spending in Half,” “Americans should prepare for fewer wars, not different ones.” After event 911, US government keeps increasing military spending, that is not to reduce the effect of that event but to lead to the Iraq war which spends a huge amount of money. During the war time lot of people are in a stressful emotion. So people want governments to cut military spending instead to have a peaceful environment (Friedmen).

Some other reasons might be that increasing military spending is a kind of waste of resources. Because this is a peaceful society, there shouldn't be much more conflicts among countries. Spending a lot of money to buy military is useless for the development of the country. The governments need a defense budget worthy of the name and they need military restraint. The weapons they bought will not use in their daily life and will not work well for them. They want their money to work and don’t waste every single dollar.

In my opinion, I suggest the government cut the military spending. In an increasingly peaceful social environment, weapons are not the only way to solve the problem. Instead, what people need is a more stable and peaceful social environment. In such a society of peace and stability, it is benefiting for the rapid development of the country, and people can live a long life. So reducing or cutting military spending is a win-win solution. Neither the illegal arms trade, nor the horrible terrorists’ attacks will happen. There is even no war between nations; the whole world is surrounded by peace, so it is good for the development of human civilization. Even if the country has a highly spend of military, that does not means it can control over the world. The military is just a tool to protect the country from the outside attack and increase the sense of security. It doesn't means an over controlling power in the world, no matter who you are.

In conclusion, although people have different views on military spending, the world’s theme which is peace and it won’t change. Peace is the base of development. No matter how much a country spends on their military that does not mean another country, which spends more money on military, can control over it. However, several countries strongly agree with increasing their military spending thinking it will elevate their status in the world. It may not be wrong, but it is not exactly true. Military spending is just a factor that determines a country’s defense level and military strength.

Work Cited

“Arms Trade.” Current Issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Brookes, Peter. “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Could Lead to a Dangerous Arms Race.” Armed Forces Journal 145 (Nov. 2007): 8-10. Rpt. in The Arms Trade. Ed. Noel Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Cordesman, Anthony H. “The Arms Trade in the Middle East Will Lead to Greater Stability.” International Herald Tribune (16 Aug. 2007). Rpt. in The Arms Trade. Ed. Noel Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Friedman, Benjamin H. “The US should cut military spending in half.” The Christian Science Monitor. 27 April 2009. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Karlsson, Ida. “Unchecked Arms Trade Fuelling Conflict, Poverty.” Inter Press Service. 2010. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.

Talent, Jim. “Don’t Cut Military Spending.” National Review Online. 04 Nov 2010. Web. 22 Nov 2010.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Military

...At this time the United States of America does not required men to serve in the military like other countries? Well I have wondered why myself to. But I am going to point out three reasons on why I think men should have to serve in this essay. One being men need to learn discipline. Two we need to keep this country that we live in safe and secured. And lastly to boost our economy and put more people to work. Men should serve in the military to lean discipline. Men these day have no respect for there parents let alone the cops. The military will help train them to respect people above them. Not only that it will help them with work ethic from the discipline point of view to be able to do their job and work hard at doing it. They will break you down and build you back up through training and physical training. If you screw up they will teach you how to act and then make you do some kind of physical training so it will sink you to your head. It is vital in our country to keep it protected to keep our freedoms that our fore fathers fought for and all the men and women before us. There for all men should be required to serve in the military. We are in a world of terrorism in this day and age, for example September 11, 2001 automatically comes to mind when I think of terrorism. Therefore men shouldn’t have to be asked to join they should just want to join if they want to keep their freedoms that they have. Where are the jobs in this country? Where is the money in this country...

Words: 473 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Military

...VERIFICATION OF MILITARY EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING VERIFICATION OF MILITARY EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING | | | | 1. LAST NAME - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAMEAPPEL LUKE EDWARD | 2. PAY GRADEE-4 | 3. YEAR(S) IN SERVICE3 | 4. MILITARY SERVICE AND COMPONENTMARINE CORPS, ACTIVE | 5. DATE OF INFORMATION2011 JAN 01 | 6. EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING HISTORY (In reverse chronological order) AND RELATED INFORMATION | EXPERIENCE HISTORY: | | OCCUPATION: 0811, Field Artillery Cannoneer PRIMARY OCCUPATION: MARINE CORPS, ACTIVE: CORPORAL, Pay Grade E-4 OCT 2010 - JAN 2011 (3 Months) MARINE CORPS, ACTIVE: LANCE CORPORAL, Pay Grade E-3 AUG 2008 - OCT 2010 (2 Years 2 Months) MARINE CORPS, ACTIVE: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS, Pay Grade E-2 DEC 2007 - AUG 2008 (8 Months) DUTY OCCUPATION: MARINE CORPS, ACTIVE: CORPORAL, Pay Grade E-4 OCT 2010 - JAN 2011 (3 Months) MARINE CORPS, ACTIVE: LANCE CORPORAL, Pay Grade E-3 AUG 2008 - OCT 2010 (2 Years 2 Months) MARINE CORPS, ACTIVE: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS, Pay Grade E-2 DEC 2007 - AUG 2008 (8 Months) OCCUPATION DESCRIPTION FROM SERVICE FILE FOR: 0811 (Description dates SEP 1975 - JAN 2011) As a member of a field artillery howitzer battery, cannoneers prepare artillery pieces and equipment for movement, combat, and firing. They inspect and prepare ammunition for firing, and perform the various jobs incident to firing such as, laying for elevation and deflection, loading the piece, and handling ammunition. Field artillery......

Words: 2693 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Military

...Gay’s within the Military This is a paper about how gay’s are aloud within the military. I will have this paper based on the pros and cons on the subject. It will be how I feel about it and along with how I think others will be based on this subject. It will be a broad band about this and will hopefully get the point of why I think it is ok with gay’s being in the military. With gay’s being within the military, I’m ok with it. I was in the Marines and with the guys I was with who knows if they were or were not gay already. They have their own life and choices as well as anybody else that wants to be in the military. Everybody deserves a chance to do something that they would like to do in their life. They are people like you and me. There are people out there that will not do anything for the military but then you have people that want to do it but cant because of what they believe in. That would be like telling someone that they can’t do it because of their race. Everyone has their own point of view when it comes to something like this but I think when they started to allow gays in the military it has really changed more people than it was made out to be. Not only for the gays life but also people that have nothing against them are happy for them to be able to do something that others won’t ever think about doing. When I first heard that they were aloud I was too happy about it because you never know how they will react to certain things, but when it came to me thinking......

Words: 747 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Military

...succeeding Ronald Reagan. He entered office at a period of change in the world; the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of Soviet Union came early in his presidency. He ordered military operations in Panama and the Persian Gulf, at one point, Bush was recorded as having a record-high approval rating of 89 percent. Early in his term, Bush faced the problem of what to do with leftover deficits spawned by the Reagan years. At $220 billion in 1990, the deficit had grown to three times its size since 1980. Which to this day we still have not fully recovered from. Had Bush not entered into his presidential position with so many millions of dollars in debt, I believe its quite possible that he would have been reelected in 1992 because he wouldn’t have been disliked so greatly for breaking his word and promise to America to not raise taxes during his term in office. The Persian Gulf Was also known as operation Desert Storm, was initiated on January 17th 1991. This was a very emotional time for not only my family but also the American people. President George H. W. Bush deployed U.S. forces into Saudi Arabia, and also urged other countries to send their own forces to the scene. An array of nations joined the Coalition. Being that I was from a big southern family, being a member in the US Military was deemed very respectable. I recall having several family members that were deployed during operation Desert Storm. It was a tough time at home for my parents knowing that close......

Words: 1147 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Federal Spending

...producers, consumers, and investors will be affected one way or another which will cause unnecessary concern. This may all sounds quite bad, but all money the money borrowed is used on the American people and their needs. The federal spending is a rather huge issue in the US today, especially since we are 16.8 trillion in debt to other countries as of 2013. Some people may question about what all this money is being used for or where is it mostly going to. Well, I can say that the money is being put to good use to major programs such as military, social security, unemployment, medical insurance, public capital, and interest of US debt. The military budget is a very important budget that the US needs to fund. Part of the US debt comes from need to pay for the training, health care, salaries, equipment, operation funds, and developing of new equipment. Not only that, the US has to also fund all the branches of the US military such as the air force, army, navy, coast guard, and the marine corps. A recent live study observed that one fifth of the spending from US goes straight into the budget of military. A total of 661.29 billion dollars were spent on military funding online, which is a rather big chunk contributing the US debt. An even bigger spending was the social security factor. Social security is very important for the people because it created and designed to help workers with lower than the average income in retirement. It was also created to help the people with......

Words: 1242 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Military

...Controversy in the Military For the longest time homosexuals have had to deal with discrimination everywhere, including the military. When Bill Clinton ran for president, he gave a promise to the gays he would allow them to fight, but changed his stance when elected and did not follow through on his promise. Instead Clinton issued the policy Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell that still hindered the homosexual’s chance of getting into the military. Finally, now after years of discrimination, a Representative of the House wrote a bill that will allow homosexuals the right to join and fight in the armed forces. The H.R. 1283 Military Readiness Enhancement Act of 2009 states homosexuals can join the military and should pass for the benefit of all those who serve the armed forces. Official discrimination against homosexuals began during World War II. Before World War II, it was only African Americans who had a hard time joining the military, but then the military started becoming stricter on who can join and who cannot. The military started making people take a psychological test, where anyone who wanted to join the military had to get tested by a psychiatrist (Katel). If people claimed they were gay, they could not join the armed forces. Discrimination continued in every war America has fought until Bill Clinton came along. When Clinton ran for president, he guaranteed to lift the ban that the military established on not allowing homosexuals the right to fight. To get around his campaign...

Words: 866 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Military

...allow any third party anything in association with the military or any of it’s governmental functioning counter parts ala... national guards, reserves, commission corpse, naval reserves , marines reserves etc… DODD rule 8750 insures that all military servicemen must be certified in their prospective fields and be proficient in their MOS field after boot camp and AIT. (DoDD, 2011) To become a soldier one must first visit a local recruiting office; there a person may engage in talks with a recruiter, the recruiter’s main job is to help assess the civilian enquires about their military desires, the recruiter must talk to a recruit and his legal guardian or parents as no one under 18 can’t make decisions for themselves without their parents/ guardians permission. The recruiter then will start the process, one of the recruiter’s first assignments is to get the civilian ASVAB scores from their local high school or if the recruit is from out of town they can be retested on the ASVAB. The ASVAB stands for Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test and it accesses a recruit’s probability for enlistment, military job placement and career exploration after the military. ASVAB scoring is based on (IRT) Item Response Theory, this model is used because it measures the examinee’s ability to be placed on the same scale as everyone else and each test is tailored to a specific ability level needed when the examinee picks their military job. The IRT model uses the (3pl) in which......

Words: 1087 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Healthcare Spending

...National Health Care Spending Health care is something that is always going to be around because it is needed by all entities. Due to affordability it is not available to all which is a growing issue. Many people try to find the most affordable health care insurance, but sometimes economic hardships do not allow for people to get insured or remain insured; therefore leaving many people without health care insurance. The government has tried to help many people by providing those who qualify with Medicaid and Medical but those who don’t qualify are still left uninsured and with the burden of overwhelming medical bills. Even though health care is at times unaffordable it is still an entity that is used by all people. Often time’s people cannot afford to pay for health care expenses or health care insurance, therefore leaving many people with massive health care bills. In the United States, which has both a high level of health care spending per capita and a relatively high rate of real growth in spending, the share of GDP devoted to health care spending grew from 9% of GDP in 1980 to 16% of GDP in 2008. This 7 percentage-point increase in health care spending as a share of GDP is one of the largest across the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD. Current Level of National Healthcare Spending The predictability of health care cost has recognized for years by citizens, businesses, and government agencies such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid...

Words: 1596 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Military

...Why We Serve In the Military Sometimes it takes something terrible to realize what is important in life. When I was in the Army, I would constantly raise questions in my mind. “Why did I have to sacrifice being away from our love ones” or “Did we really need to protect anyone else other than our own”. It was 6:00 AM on a Monday morning. Everything was normal; I woke up, laced up my boots and went to work as a Squad leader over construction equipment operators. As I was driving to work my cell phone started to ring. I answered and on the other line was my 1st Sergeant; “Cotten I’m going to need you to come see me in my office for possible re-assignment”. At that point I thought he had a last minute tasking for me to go deploy to one of the countries in a faraway land. As I arrived at our unit’s building, I couldn’t help but think of the possibility of being gone for next twelve to eighteen months in a faraway country under a 100 plus degree sun. With palms sweaty and heart pounding at an incredible rate, I knocked and entered my 1st Sergeant’s office; “You wanted to see me Top?” I responded. “Yes, you are temporarily going to be assigned down the road as liaison for dignified transfers” he uttered. At that point I was relieved that I didn’t have to go anywhere and suffer under extreme conditions. The following day I reported to the protocol building and began my new job. As I walked in the building I couldn’t help but feel fortunate that I will be working with the......

Words: 935 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Military

...Coordination between the Military and Civilian Organisations: Issues and Solutions The work described in this document has been undertaken by the Human Factors Integration Defence Technology Centre, part funded by the Human Capability Domain of the U.K. Ministry of Defence Scientific Research Programme. © BAE Systems 2009 The authors of this report have asserted their moral rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents act, 1988, to be identified as the authors of this work. Reference ...........................................HFIDTC/2/WP3.1.4/3 Version.................................................................................2 Date............................................................... 19th May 2009 © BAE Systems 2009. Issued by Aerosystems International Ltd on behalf of the HFI DTC consortium. The HFI DTC consortium consists of Aerosystems International Ltd, Cranfield University, Lockheed Martin, MBDA, SEA, Brunel University, Southampton University and the University of Birmingham HFIDTC/2/WP3.1.4/3 Version 2/ 19th May 2009 Authors Paul Salmon Daniel Jenkins Neville Stanton Guy Walker Brunel University Brunel University Brunel University Brunel University ii HFIDTC/2/WP3.1.4/3 Version 2/ 19th May 2009 Contents 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Executive Summary ................................................................................... 1 Background and reasoning behind the work ...................................................

Words: 16056 - Pages: 65

Premium Essay

Military

...past weekend??? Do you feel safe in America at this time? Well im Desmond and today we are going to talk about reasons we should not cut the Military Defense Budget. The 2016 national defense budget is 534 billion. I know that is a lot of money but can we really put a number on our safty. I got that fiqure from the Department of Defense website under fiscal year 2016 which started on Oct 1,2015 There are a lot of reasons we should maintain this budget but im going to highlight 3 of them. According to the Department of Defense website the US has a total 1,486,000 millitary personal on active duty with that in mind if we make cuts to the budget we could lose key personal in military ranks that could hurt us in some areas like intelligence, special forces and aviation. According to Global Firepower.com and business insider.com the United States has the best Trained Military personal in the World . My second argument is that in order to keep this elite status and to protect America we must maintain the budget and continue to train at a top level. Based on the current and past terrorist acts throughout the World if we make any cuts to the current budget we could lose the proper equipment that we use to aid military personal who need these tools to help while protecting this great country. The Equipment is a vidail in the fight to prevent terrorism......

Words: 326 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Military

...Military Technology Technology in the military has greatly increased strength and eased the ranking among world powers and effected the development of new military weapons. The term "Survival of the fittest" means that the strong will succeed but the meek will not, this is the case with military technology. The U.S. has the best technology in the world, therefore we are the highest military power. Technology is a very important part of warfare. Technology is driven by the military. The army's race during the cold war, spawned some of the greatest technical achievements in human history. Space travel for example is a result of the X-plane project. The Internet was produced by the military as well. If we stop investing in military technology, we risk our safety. If other nations had more advance technology than we do, they would have more power than we do. If that was to happen, we face the threat of that nation taking over us. Military technology may be divided into five categories. Offensive arms harm the enemy, while defensive weapons ward off offensive attacks. Transportation technology moves soldiers and weaponry; communications coordinate the movements of armed forces; and sensors detect forces and guide weaponry. There are many types of technological developments in the military happening at all times. They range from new aircraft to sophisticated guidance systems. Teams of specialists work for years to develop some of our simplest equipment. These......

Words: 2367 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Military

...soldier to go to sick call; however it is wrong to abuse this right. You are encouraged to go to sick call as soon as a problem arises but do not use it as an excuse to get out of PT. Remember that if Quarters is recommended and you are not married and you are assign to the barracks that will be your place of duty, unless indicated and or approved by your chain of command. 5. Personal Appearance: You are expected to maintain your appearance in accordance with AR 670-1. I haven’t got paid yet will not be and acceptable excuse when it comes to uniforms and haircuts. Uniforms will be pressed and boots highly shined. 6. Conduct: You are expected to maintain disciplined behavior both on and off duty and always maintain your military bearing. Never forget you are a professional soldier in the United States Army. Know and practice the Army Values. 7. Chain of Command: It is imperative that you know and use your chain of command properly. Communication is a two way street. You should always provide feedback to your leaders so that there is always understanding of mission and orders. If you do not understand or cannot complete your mission let us know as soon as possible. 8. Leaves, Passes, and Comp Time: Passes and any time off during normal duty hours must be earned. Leaves should be submitted under normal circumstances three weeks prior to the start date to ensure proper processing. Time off from work to take care of personal business will be......

Words: 1134 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Government Spending

...pay off debt incurred by the Revolutionary War. Until the Great Depression in 1933, federal debt was used only to fund wars. In 1933, President Roosevelt began spending and raised the federal debt to around 40% of the GDP. From that point on, the federal debt has ranged from 122% of the GPD following WWII, to 50% of the GDP during the Cold War to the current value of 99.4% as presidential policies and goals changed (see Figure 1). During the end of the Clinton administration and through parts of the Bush administration the United States retained a budget surplus. However, from 2009 through 2012 the debt will have risen 5.3 trillion (see Figure 2). Currently our debt totals $47,664 per capita. While perhaps this is not as bad as the situation is in countries such as the UK or Ireland (see Figure 3), with debt totals as high as $478,087 per capita, it is certainly not a preferable situation for the nation. For many years, there have been numerous proposals to cut the federal budget. People are reluctant to cut spending in areas such as education, defense, and energy. The area that is most often singled out for cuts are entitlements. Entitlements and government benefits include areas such as government pensions, Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance. These benefits make up around half of federal spending. Interestingly enough, many people who receive these benefits don’t see them as entitlements. 44% of people receiving benefits from Social Security......

Words: 1668 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

U.S. Military Spending and Its Impact on the Economy’s Gdp

...U.S. Military Spending and its impact on the Economy’s GDP Matthew Magana Abstract This paper examines whether increases in military spending have a positive or negative impact on the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The paper focuses on the three North American economies: Canada, Mexico and the United States as models to develop a case. It will also illustrate the utilization of multiple economic tools to produce variable outcomes to analyze the full spectrum of economics. It will also discuss the multiple statistical models such as Granger causality and Vector autoregression and the asymmetric results produced. Increased U.S. Military Spending and its impact on the Economy Given the long-accepted, theoretical direct relationship between investment and economic growth, if defense spending has a negative impact on investment, then it would seem reasonable that defense spending would have an adverse impact on economic growth. This was exactly the findings of two studies published in the seventies, zymanski (1973) and Lee (1973). Some studies attribute the negative effect of defense spending on economic growth to reduced investment. Another study argues that defense spending restricts export growth and economic growth because military expenditures compete for the same resources used in the production of exports. Which may also be a understood trade off for military spending vs. export and economic growth. However, other studies were unable to find any......

Words: 1973 - Pages: 8