Premium Essay

Korus Fta

In: Business and Management

Submitted By xxxricagrlxxx
Words 1101
Pages 5

The United States-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) is a trade agreement between U.S. and South Korea. Signed on June 30, 2007 by President George W. Bush still has to be approved by Congress. This Free Trade Agreement would be the largest for South Korea and the second largest for US, after the NAFTA. As the fourteenth largest economy of the world, South Korea is the seventh largest trading partner of the United States. An agreement was reached in which it was concluded that an FTA between both countries would increase the investments industry and bilateral trade. In the proposed FTA issues like trade, investments, autos, agricultures, and financial services were included. However, there has been some dispute over the KORUS FTA (mainly about the auto and agricultural industry), which hasn’t allowed it to be finalized. U.S. debates about the non-tariffs impact South Korea can impose on the beef and automobile industry.


In order for the KORUS FTA to be eligible for approval and both parties can be benefit from economic growth, an alliance, and stability, some changes need to be done. This review recommends approval to change the following key point of the agreement:

• Auto industry:

1. The United States should ensure the complete or mostly elimination of South Korea’s non-tariff barriers that are created without input from foreign automakers and forced without warning. For example, the license plate size, keyless entry systems, power window configurations, tinted windows, and bumper configuration.
2. United States should negotiate the removing of tariffs such as owners of imported vehicles have to pay a higher car insurance because their cars are placed in a higher risk classification in South Korea; making it harder for foreign automakers to sell their cars in South Korea and make any profit.
3. Also, remove…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Fta Between Colombia and Usa

...FTA BETWEEN COLOMBIA AND USA, A GOOD ALTERNATIVE TO OPEN OUR COUNTRY TO AN INTERNATIONAL MARKET. Many people think that the Free trade agreement between Colombia and United States is not a good option to our producers because we are not ready to open our market, but we are in a globalized world and if Colombia hadn´t approved this agreement, we would have been producing in the same way without thinking to improve our methods and how to be more competitive. This agreement was negotiated in 2006 and on May of this year, the agreement came into force. An FTA “is a trade agreement between certain countries granting their members an exclusive favor and is a common type of regional trade agreements.” This sort of agreement is very important for countries to attract foreign investment and to improve the economic growth. Even though it is not easy for developing countries as Colombia, these regional trade agreements are expanding now a days, and they have more advantages than disadvantages for this countries. Advantages that allow Colombia to grow In the first place, An FTA does not required constant changes, which makes it a stable and predictable instrument with clear rules to both countries involved in the agreement. As well as this, when Colombia accepted this negotiation, a lot of studies about positive changes because of the agreement were made, and the results were a possible economic growth, increasing exports and creation of both qualified and no qualified employment...

Words: 1032 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Fta Afta Compliance

...FTA: The upcoming challenges to the Malaysian automotive industry  AFTA and Malaysian car industries Proton and Perodua are really going to feel the threat of AFTA if they are not prepared by the year 2005. Government has helped them by deferring the AFTA from 2003 to 2005. So now it is up to the local manufacturers to come out with their own remedies to face AFTA. The truth fact is that nobody can escape from liberalization of car industry in this region. From my opinion, Proton has already started preparing for AFTA. But is it enough? Sales have been projected to drop significantly for Proton once AFTA is implemented. One of the measures taken by Proton is in R & D sector. They have come up with first Malaysian design car. This is a milestone in Proton, which was realized using latest technology like Rapid Prototyping and commitment by the employees. Proton is also doing research and development with Lotus engineering and Petronas-Sauber Formula 1 team to come up with own engine. This moves in R &D sector is very important for them. Now they can show their own identity to the world rather than copying prototype of Mitsubishi cars. They have changed to a new logo that will give them more precise identity. Perodua still lack in this field, they still come out with Daihatsu prototype cars to manufacture in Malaysia.  Local manufacturers have to come with their own identity or brand if they want to penetrate the ASEAN market. In order to have own identity, they......

Words: 1724 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Stoplet-Samuelson Theorem

...comparison with the exported good. In case of homogenous products, this will increase the price of the import good and the import-competing good, as a result, the resources will shift toward the import-competing good and will shift away from the export good. It is logical that this shift of resources will end in an increase of the demand of the factor that is being more intensively used for the production of the good, increasing the price of it. If we look at the Herschel-Ohlin Model, we can see that the import competing goods will make intensive use of the country's scare factor. That is why the price of the factor that is increasing, must be the scarce one. II. Effects of the free trade agreement between the U.S.A. and South Korea ( KORUS FTA) It is of great importance to say first, that the United States is a labor scarce and capital abundant country and that South Korea is a labor abundant and capital scarce country. The Herscher-Ohlin Theorem says that because of difference in factor endowments, the U.S. will export capital intensive products (as it is more cheap for this country to produce them) and South Korea will export labor intensive products. The Stolper-Samuelson theorem shows that the free trade will provoke a decrease in the wages of the factor less intensively used for the production. In the case of the U.S.A., the wages of labor will decrease and the interest on capital in South Korea will decrease too. Nevertheless, we can not say that the......

Words: 1051 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ntui Letter to Pm on Eu-India Fta

...The Government of India entered into negotiation with the European Commission (EC) in June 2007 on the EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and since then the government has consistently refused to share information with the people, including their democratically elected representatives. The government has continued to negotiate free trade agreements (FTAs) despite widespread resistance of citizens to WTO-mandated trade liberalization in general and FTAs in particular. FTAs entail much greater access to domestic markets through a massive reduction of import duties and include trade in services, priority to investor rights, tighter intellectual property standards, unfair competition policy and restricted government procurement. The ASEAN-India FTA was signed without Chief Ministers of different states seeing the offer of goods to the ten ASEAN countries. The Korea-India FTA was signed in complete secrecy in August 2009. Many of the subjects that are being negotiated in these FTAs are state and concurrent subjects in the constitution, yet consent of states and parliament has not been obtained. The EU-India FTA paves the road for: 1. TRIPS-plus intellectual property protection: In light of the recent Supreme Court judgment in the Novartis patent case on the cancer drug Glivec, the EU’s demands for TRIPS-plus intellectual property (IP) rights will not just intensify monopolies over seed and encourage proprietary agriculture technologies – such as GM crops and fish, it......

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Trans-Pacific Partnership

...information is classified and kept from U.S. government officials. However, several documents have been leaked to the public through various sources. -There is much clamor and concern over the Intellectual Property proposals put forth by the U.S. These proposals threaten to dial back public health safeguards set forth in the 2007 New Trade Deal of the Bush administration, increase prices of consumer goods, and restrict access to information on the internet. -There are 12 countries involved in negotiations, with China as an observer and considering entry. Overall, these countries make up about 40% of the world GDP and offer access to huge markets for the U.S. Nonetheless, the threat of losing jobs overseas, as with most FTAs, is cause for concern. -Past FTAs have resulted in an increase in U.S. trade deficit and a loss of jobs. However, analysis shows that American firms can benefit from these agreements as well with increased exports to new markets. Brief History The Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement is a free trade agreement with the goal of liberalizing the borders and economies of the Asia-Pacific Region and was initiated in 2005 by Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, and later Brunei. Eight more countries have joined in the negotiations since 2008: the United States, Australia, Vietnam, Peru, Malaysia, Mexico, Japan, and Canada. China has also expressed interest in joining the agreement, but is not as of yet directly involved in negotiations.......

Words: 3183 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Us-Korea Relationship

...throughout Korea; Korean students attending U.S. universities; Koreans who visit the United States every year; and Koreans and Korean-Americans living and working in the United States.  They will ensure that interaction and cooperation among our peoples will continue to grow over the next 60 years and beyond. Economic Relationship The fourth and final pillar is our ever-expanding economic and trade partnership.  Trade accounts for 90 percent of Korea’s economy.  The United States is Korea’s 3rd largest national trading partner and 2nd largest export market.  This year not only marks the 60th anniversary of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea, but also the first anniversary of the KORUS FTA going into effect. KORUS Successes Despite a global downturn last year, total bilateral trade under KORUS increased to nearly 130 billion dollars.  Korean consumers are seeing lower prices and more choices on a variety of American products, such as cars, wine, seafood, and nuts.  Likewise, Korean companies are exporting more autos, consumer electronics, and household appliances to the United States than ever before. One of my favorite examples of “win-win” trade is the auto sector.  Hyundai and Kia are major players in the American market, and their Korean parts suppliers are dominated by small- and medium-sized enterprises.  With over 30,000 parts in one vehicle, that’s a lot of economic activity.  I am also pleased to see that exports of U.S. passenger cars to Korea increased......

Words: 1487 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Fta South Korean and Eu

...FTA: South Korea & The EU | | | Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 International Trade between South Korea & the European Union 6 A Macroeconomic Analysis of South Korea 6 The Free Trade Agreement between South Korea & the EU 6 International Trade between SK & EU 9 Other FTA Examples of South-Korea 10 World Trade Organization (WTO): Position regarding Bilateral Agreements 11 Conclusion & Recommendations 14 References / Endnotes 15 Appendices 17 Executive Summary This report analyzes trade relations between South Korea, one of the four Asian dragons, with the European Union, which has the largest nominal GDP and GDP PPP in the world. South Korea's industrialization, urbanization and GDP are rapidly growing mainly because of its comparative advantage in manufacturing and exporting of technological goods, its political centralization also supports a clear coordination and effectiveness of laws reforms. However, its aging population, low fertility rates, recent decline in FDIs and unresolved political disputes with Democratic People's Republic of Korea should be amended in order to increase consumer confidence and improve its international potential. South Korea's main partners are the United States of America and the European Union. The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (2011) offers, among other things, preferential import duties and liberalization in trade of services via provisions for......

Words: 4530 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Oman Fta

...Como ya conocemos un tratado de libre comercio (TLC) es un acuerdo comercial vinculante que suscriben dos o más países para acordar la concesión de preferencias arancelarias mutuas y la reducción de barreras no arancelarias al comercio de bienes y servicios. A fin de profundizar la integración económica de los países firmantes, un TLC incorpora además de los temas de acceso a nuevos mercados, otros aspectos normativos relacionados al comercio, tales como propiedad intelectual, inversiones, políticas de competencia, servicios financieros, telecomunicaciones, comercio electrónico, asuntos laborales, disposiciones medioambientales y mecanismos de defensa comercial y de solución de controversias. Los TLC tienen un plazo indefinido, es decir, permanecen vigentes a lo largo del tiempo por lo que tienen carácter de perpetuidad. Conociendo un poco más de los mismos exploraremos el TLC entre Omán y Estados Unidos y como Puerto Rico se podría beneficiar de los acuerdos llegados por estos dos países. El tratado entre Omán y Estados Unidos establece que reconociendo los fuertes lazos de amistad entre ellos, deseos de fortalecer sus relaciones económicas, los mercados abiertos y competitivos son los principales motores de la eficiencia económica, la innovación y el crecimiento los mismos se encuentran deseosos de crear nuevas oportunidades de empleo y elevar el nivel de vida de sus ciudadanos por la liberalización y la expansión del comercio entre ellos. Como objetivo de ambos países......

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Global Marketing liberalization since the end of World War II, mainly by the removal of trade barriers such as quotas, subsidies, and tariffs. America has pursued multilateral negotiations for years with a number of countries through the General Agreement on Tariffs (Gabriel. H, Oct, 2007). On April 4th, 2007, after 10 months of negotiations, the United States concluded a free trade agreement with South Korea, which was the most important since the 1994 NAFTA (Gabriel. H, Oct, 2007). According to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, today South Korea is the world’s 10th-largest economy and America’s 7th-largest trading partner. The KORUS FTA is expected to abolish about 95 percent of tariffs on all industry within three years (Gabriel. H, Oct, 2007). It is not easy to affirm that who is the winner and who is the loser between the two countries of KORUS FTA, which was finalized at March 15th, 2012. However, as considering the domestic situation for each country, there are clear winners and losers. First, on the side of the United States, the winners include international financiers who will benefit from foreign investor rights and auto makers who will benefit from increased auto-exports (California Fair Trade Coalition, n.d.). On the other hand, the losers are manufacturers, workers, farmers, and consumers who will lose their competitive powers from decreased benefits (California Fair Trade Coalition, n.d.). In addition, on the side of South Korea, the main winners would be the......

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Global Business Cultural Analysis: Republic of Korea

...Global Business Cultural Analysis: Republic of Korea Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide information to business professionals about the Republic of Korea, the Korean culture, and the peculiarities of conducting business in this country. The topics discussed include a brief historical background about the nation, its dimensions of culture, how these elements are integrated by Koreans, and a comparison between these characteristics and American culture and business practices. The paper examines the implications for US firms wishing to do business in Korea using Hofstede’s Dimensions of culture, a SWOT analysis, and FDI analysis. Keywords: culture, religion, Confucianism, innovation, export, KORUS FTA Historical Background of Korea The Republic of Korea (ROK) is commonly known as South Korea. For the remainder of this paper, the ROK will be synonymous with "Korea". Korea is located in northeast Asia on the Korean peninsula between the Yellow Sea and the Sea of Japan. It borders the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), also called North Korea (nK), immediately to the north, across the 38th parallel. Korea's total land area is nearly 62,000 miles, slightly larger than Indiana ( It has an ethnically homogeneous population of over 49 million people, 83% of which live in urban areas ( According to legend, Korea's birth as a nation was in 2333 BC with its early inhabitants coming from and heavily influenced by......

Words: 9115 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Business Law

...foreign markets. The KORUS Agreement supports the President’s National Export Initiative goal of doubling of U.S. exports in five years. It would also promote the further integration of the U.S. and Korean economies and enhance the competitiveness of U.S. business in the world’s 12th largest economy. For agricultural products, the KORUS Agreement would immediately eliminate or phase out tariffs and quotas on a broad range of products, with almost two-thirds of Korea’s agriculture imports from the United States becoming duty free upon entry into force. Effective March 15, 2012 entry into force of the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) marks a historic milestone in the economic integration of the United States and Korea.  Companies with U.S.-Korea business interests should carefully plan to take full advantage of the many opportunities KORUS presents. Effective March 15, 2012, with justifiable fanfare, the United States and South Korea bring into force the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS), marking an important and historic milestone in the economic integration of these two major trading partners.  With two-way trade already valued at more than US$85 billion annually, KORUS is the most commercially significant U.S. free trade agreement (FTA) since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).  Businesses across industries in both countries stand to benefit immediately, and over the long term, from the trade liberalizing commitments in KORUS.  Companies with......

Words: 3679 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Mexico´S Ftas

...Introduction Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) have proved to be one of the best ways to open up foreign markets to U.S. exporters. Trade Agreements reduce barriers to U.S. exports, and protect U.S. interests and enhance the rule of law in the FTA partner country. The reduction of trade barriers and the creation of a more stable and transparent trading and investment environment make it easier and cheaper for U.S. companies to export their products and services to trading partner markets. Agreement | Countries | Enters into force | Advantages | Disadvantages | NAFTA | Mexico, Canada and United States of America | January 1st of 1989 | Market Access for Goods, Protection for Foreign Investment, Protection for Intellectual Property, Easier Access for Business Travelers, Access to Government Procurement. | U.S. Jobs Were Lost,U.S. Wages Were Suppressed,Mexico's Farmers Were Put Out of Business,Maquiladora Workers Were Exploited,Mexico's Environment Deteriorated | FTA Nicaragua | Mexico and Nicaragua | July 1st of 1998 | Provisions on national treatment and market access for goods andservices; rules of origin; agriculture; sanitary and phytosanitary measures; telecommunications;financial services; | The FTA does not include a chapter on competition policy, energy, environment, labor, or transportation. | FTA Costa Rica | Mexico and Costa Rica | January 1st of 1995 | Provisions on national treatment and market access for goods, the agreementcontains provisions on......

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Analysis of the Impact of Fta on Singapore

...------------------------------------------------- ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF FTA ON SINGAPORE’S TRADE AND RELATIONSHIP WITH ITS ASIAN NEIGHBOURS MIB39 GROUP A INSTRUCTOR: Phil EYRE GROUP MEMBERS: Janani GANESAN Rohan GULAGI Elea GINO Matilde GOMEZ GUZMAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Sr No | Title | Page Number | 1 | Introduction | 3 | 2 | Summary and Scope | 3 | 2.1 | Tariff Reduction | 3 | 2.2 | Outward Sourcing | 4 | 2.3 | Integrated Sourcing Initiative | 4 | 2.4 | Telecommunications and e-commerce | 4 | 2.5 | Investments | 4 | 2.6 | Services | 5 | 2.7 | Intellectual Property(IPP) | 5 | 3 | Aim, Benefits and Risks of Signatories and Stakeholders | 5 | 3.1 | Signatory | 5 | 3.1.1 | Aims and Motives | 5 | 3.1.2 | Benefits | 6 | 3.1.3 | Risks | 7 | 3.2 | Stakeholder | 7 | 4 | Impact of the USSFTA on Third Parties: The ASEAN Countries | 8 | 5 | Assessment of Implementation | 9 | 6 | Conclusion: Assessment of Success/Failure | 10 | 7 | Bibliography | 12 | 1. INTRODUCTION (Elea) In this report, we will analyze the impact of the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA) on Singapore’s trade and on its relationships with its Asian neighbors. Singapore being the first South Asian country to enter into a bilateral free trade agreement with the United States, we wanted to focus our analysis on the impact on its trade only. Indeed, it is quite obvious that this agreement is beneficial for the US, but we thought it was......

Words: 4388 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Korus Case

...The Korea-US Free Trade Agreement or (KORUS) for short is essentially a tool used to expand trade and investment between the U.S. and South Korea. As with anything there are always hurdles or issues that you have to overcome. Some of the major issues that have been discussed in the KORUS Case are: predictions of U.S. economic losses as result of KORUS, displaced U.S. jobs, currency manipulation by Korea, concerns of sub-par labor/environmental standards/conditions. Although there are many critics who say that KORUS has led to lost jobs and so forth, the overall evidence is that overall trade has increased, exports have increased, and Koreas Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the U.S. has increased. An example of Currency Manipulation potentially hurting the benefits of free trade is when an exporting country devalues its currency in order to artificially boost exports. The cheaper your currency is in relation to another country’s the more product or service you will receive for each buck you use to buy something. Any artificial decreasing in the exporting countries currency will be at the expense of the importing nation. As an importing country overall, currency manipulation is something that the U.S. will need to address through reasonable bi-lateral policies, procedures and regulations outlined within the Free Trade Agreements. Fear of Sub-par labor conditions in foreign trade deals are something that have become a mainstream concern. Although most Americans......

Words: 292 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Global Business

...Stacy Schuster Global Business Assignment 2 Recently the U.S. and South Korea came to have reached agreement on a landmark trade deal. According to an article by Martha Grevatt the “landmark deal” makes modification to a previous trade agreement, KORUS, negotiated by George W. Bush and former South Korean President Roh-Moo Hyun. The preceding points in this paper will explore the differentiating views of two articles on the trade agreement, which disagree on whether the agreement is beneficial or not. A. The long awaited revision of a free trade agreement met by the U.S. and South Korea is one of the largest trade pacts “by value of traded goods” the U.S. has completed since the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and Mexico. According to Evan Ramstad the trade agreement with have many effects on South Korea than the U.S. as they become will continue to play a greater role in the South Korea economy and import tariffs that have been kept high to protect its climb from poverty will be rapidly eliminated. According to the text, tariffs are a tax levied on imports (or exports) (Hill, 2010). This elimination of tariffs may reduce South Korea’s surplus in trade with the U.S., but this pact is expected to contribute to an increase in trade and U.S. firms can immediately set up shop in South Korea to work on international contracts and disputes (Ramstad, 2012). The free trade area between the U.S. and South Korea aims to drop all tariffs and increase the......

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5