Free Essay

Greenpeace

In: Social Issues

Submitted By dave1310
Words 413
Pages 2
10/24/12
English 1a

Thesis: Greenpeace is the largest independent direct- action environmental organization in the world. This organization takes action for ground-breaking changes to protect the environment to create a better future for the world.

I. Greenpeace is focused on stopping the damage on mother Earth that our civilization continues to destroy.

A. Protecting the Oceans, Whales, and Seafood that are in danger
1.Three quarters of global fish stocks are suffering from overfishing
2.Pollution from land-based sources is turning oceans into a dumping ground
3. Whale slaughter continues to put endangered species at risk B. Protecting forests that are being cut destroyed. 1. Ancient forests are being cut down 2. Eliminating wildlife habitat and harming biodiversity. C. Eliminating Toxic Chemicals that are released 1. Major companies release dangerous chemicals.
2. Dangerous chemicals are released into the environment threatening our own lives.
II. Therefore a group of activist came together to stand up, and protect our environment. A. Created by not just one person, but a group of voices, ideas, and thought over the years. B. Decided to not take any money from government or corporations. C. Their only bottom line is a green and peaceful future.
III. Greenpeace receives financial backing from two sources. A. Donors who give little and large amounts B. Campaigns, which are created by themselves.
IV. Greenpeace has accomplished many goals and is striving to complete more A. Costco improves seafood policies in a sunning win for the oceans. 1. Eliminating 12 red list species which are becoming endangered B. Banned dumping radioactive wastes at sea damaging our oceans. 1. After 5 years of campaigning the London Dumping Convention revoked dumping. 2. In 1933, the Convention banned dumping worldwide. C. Mattel and Barbie drop deforestation after a long battle. 1. Twitter feud between Barbie and Ken. 2. Media campaigns to stop companies from destroying forests. D. Teamed up with programs that stop propaganda in schools. 1. Providing the correct knowledge for our youth. 2. Teaching them the affects of using coal. E. Persuaded President Obama to take a step in the right direction to end commercial whaling. F. Teamed up with Facebook to become a champion for clean and renewable energy.
V. Greenpeace looks to keep evolving and spreading their word across the world. A. Continuing to perform campaigns.
B. Conquering the social media world constantly updating their followers.
C. Donations from informed public and private sources continues to be important.
VI. Conclusion…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Shell, Greenpeace

...Summary Shell, one of the largest multinational oil companies planned to dispose of the Brent Spar, which was huge floating oil storage and loading buoy, by sinking it at a site in the deep Northern Atlantic, with full UK Government approval. But a combination of Greenpeace, European Ministers and the public stopped them. In order to ensure that no similar incidents occur in the future, the Shell UK should seek to build an open and transparent process, involve environmental interest group like Greenpeace. Issues Disposal Options: In the last analysis, there were two options; horizontal on-shore dismantling and deep water disposal. Shell qualified the deep water disposal option as Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO). BEPO Process: Several options were evaluated according to engineering complexity, risk to health and safety of workforce, environmental impact, cost, and acceptability by the British authorities and other interested parties, such as fishermen’s associations. It is important to that stakeholders such as Greenpeace were not included. Deep water disposal option: The deep water disposal option had the advantage on the grounds of engineering complexity, risk to health and safety of the work force, and cost (about 11 million pounds versus 46 million pounds). Regulatory Principles: The International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) guidelines and UK legislation stipulate that sinking in the ocean is an acceptable option. Shell’ position: Shell was seen......

Words: 961 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Changing the World

...Changing the World The Greenpeace organization began more than 30 years ago and has grown from a small group of activist to an international origination with office in more than 30 countries ("Greenpeace", 2010). Through peaceful protest and creative communication to expose environmental problems Greenpeace as worked together with activists and supporters to ban commercial whaling, convince world leaders to stop nuclear testing, and protect Antarctica ("Greenpeace", 2010). Through protest and working with universities that have on-campus coal plants Greenpeace is fighting for the future and the health of future generations by asking the universities to change policy and transition to 100 percent clean energy. According to the Greenpeace website Michigan State University burns over 2000,000 tons of coal per year. Students at Michigan State risked being arrested and staged a sit-in at the University President’s office to demand a meeting with her about their on-campus coal plant. The Present of the University never did agree to meet with the students. (Greenpeace, 2011). . According to "Green Peace" (2010) America’s coal burning power plants, in addition to causing global warming are killing Americans through poisoning our air and water and making our children sick. Over the next three years Greenpeace plan of joining local communities to shut down dangerous coal plants across the United States. They...

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Kit Kat Pr Crisis

...Good Life”. To provide customers with the best tasting, most nutritious choices in a wide range of food and beverage categories. Nestle owns several major consumer brands such as Stouffers, Nescafe, Kit-Kat, Carnation, Nestle Water, and many others. All in all, 30 of Nestle’s products earned 1 billion CHF or more during 2010, making Nestle a major force in the global food and beverage industry. NATURE OF CRISIS: THE CRISIS: Nestle, the world’s largest food conglomerate, has undergone a turbulent period since 2010. On March 14 2010, the Independent, a UK-based newspaper, stated that Nestle’s Kit Kat contained palm oil that results in deforestation and threatens the livelihood of the endangered Orang-utans. Environmental Group Greenpeace immediately requested Nestle to “give the rainforest a break” by ending its business partnership with Sinar Mas, its palm oil supplier in Indonesia, as soon as possible. The report spurred Nestle to cancel its contract with Sinar Mas—months after Sinar Mas was shown to be involved in illegal deforestation—but the corporation continues to purchase oil palm from Cargill, which is supplied in part by Sinar Mas. For its part, Cargill says it is investigating Greenpeace's allegations and if Sinar Mas is found to be committing illegal deforestation they will drop them. Nestle has said in a statement: "we share the deep concern about the serious environmental threat to rain forests and peat fields in South East Asia caused by the planting......

Words: 2752 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Case Stufy

...Case Study 2 Public interest groups claim to work for the good of the whole society, not just one part of it. Public interest groups often have very different ideas as to how to improve society. Many public interest groups tackle a number of related issues. Greenpeace, for example, works to protect ecosystems around the world and to educate the public about dangers to the environment. They are a huge organization built around fixing the environment and making the world a better place. Greenpeace is a non-governmental organization that was started back in 1972 in Vancouver, BC. The founders of Greenpeace started it all in the late 1960s when the U.S had plans for a nuclear weapon test in the island of Amchitka, which is one of the worlds most earthquake-prone regions. In 1970 they sailed ships off towards Amchitka to stop the U.S from detonating another bomb there. Even though they got sent back, they felt sympathy for the protesters and decided not to continue with their plans to set of the bombs at that location. Greenpeace is now an organization, which uses non-violent, creative confrontation to expose global environmental problems, and to force the solutions, which are essential to a green and peaceful future. This being their main mission they have many different ways that they go about doing this. These are some ways listed by them of how they are living up to their mission statement, by doing things like: Catalyzing an energy revolution to address the number one......

Words: 1450 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Brent Spar Case Study

...announced its plans to decommission the Brent Spar oil-drilling platform in the North Sea. An environmental group, Greenpeace, opposed this decision and took it to the media to gain national support. The media painted Greenpeace protestors are courageous and a saviors of the environment. In theory, Shell took the necessary steps needed to decommission this oil-drilling platform. First, Shell invested funds into research and development to figure out the best ways to dismantle the rig. Secondly, they selected the most effective and logical option. Lastly, with the information in hand, they sought out approval from the UK government (Department of Trade and Industry and the Department of the environment) and obtained a license to sink the platform. The reason why this incident was such a controversy was because of the lack of communication between shell and the shakeholders/ factions. The stakeholders in this ordeal were Greenpeace, scientists, industry, community, etc. This in return cost them millions of dollars in revenue/profit. Greenpeace was the biggest antagonist in this situation. Shell succeeded in making them their enemy instead of an ally. Shell should have made them part of the decision making process and reviewed the limited options with Greenpeace. If Greenpeace had disagreed with shell, the decision to sink the platform would have been amicable. Greenpeace would not have taken all those steps to ensure that Shell was seen as the bad guy in the situation.......

Words: 552 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Unit 1

...profits of a business that puts them first. Green Peace Greenpeace is a global environment organisation in 28 national and regional offices around the world, providing a presence in over 40 different countries. Greenpeace was founded in 1971 with the name: Don’t Make a Wave Committee. The purpose to start this organisation was to stop the nuclear test from the VS to an island close by Alaska. It is a non-government organisation who uses non-violent confrontation to highlight global environment social problems and their causes through specific research and bearing witness to environment events. This organisation takes action to: Catalysing an energy revolution to address the number one threat facing our planet: climate change. Greenpeace want to aware the governments and industry to step up and make big improvements. Defending our oceans by challenging wasteful and fishing, and creating a global network of marine reserves. Greenpeace want to stop the fishing in the oceans because when it goes on like this, some fish types will die out. Protecting the world's ancient forests and the animals, plants and people. Forests are keeping the climate stable and maintain the balance of life on Earth. That is why Greenpeace want to stop the companies who are felling trees. Working for disarmament and peace by solving the issue by tackling the causes and nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are very dangerous for the world, Greenpeace want to stop the companies who still are making......

Words: 1072 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Ngo Assessment: Greenpeace

...NGO Assessment on Greenpeace In 1969, the U.S. announced that they were going to test a 1.2-megaton nuclear bomb on the Aleutian Island of Amchitka, Vancouver. This disturbed the Canadians because it might cause earthquakes and tidal waves, which could sweep from one end of the Pacific to the other. They tried to stop the U.S. bomb test. All sort of concerned citizens started to meet until the Don’t Make a Wave Committee was created. Don't Make a Wave was an informal committee, endorsed by the Sierra Club, the United Church of Canada, the B.C. Federation of Labour, the Canadian Voice of Women, and other peace and ecology organizations. They created uproar, making noise about the tidal wave image. The committee met in the basement of the Vancouver Unitarian Church. The meetings were exhausting and seemed to go nowhere. One day, while having a cup of coffee, wife of Jim Bohlen, Marie, suggested that they sail a boat up there and confront the bomb. Jim liked the idea and told the committee about it. The Don’t Make a Wave ad hoc group adopted the plan and opts for the name of the boat. A quiet 23-year-old Canadian carpenter, union organizer, and ecologist, Bill Darnell, who rarely spoke at the meetings, added sheepishly "Make it a green peace." The group sailed but was detained before they reached the testing area. With this act, the group created a big fuss that encouraged U.S. Demonstrations every major Canadian city. They adopted the Green Peace name in 1971 because it has a...

Words: 2418 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Greenpeace En Espagne

...Pour les actions de greenpeace même si violentes : leurs actions permettent de sensibiliser beaucoup de personnes et d’attirer l’attention sur des phénomènes qui mettent en danger la planète. La violence n’est pas leur but principal mais est parfois nécessaire pour certaines actions. Les militants ont eu raison d’occuper cette plateforme pétrolière pour alerter l’opinion. Cette association permet la protection de l’environnement : la faune et la flore qui sont menacés par les actions de l’Homme. Le principe de non-violence est un élément fondamental de la démarche de Greenpeace et est au cœur même de ses actions. Jamais de dégradation de matériels, jamais de violence envers qui que ce soit. Greenpeace concentre son attention sur les problèmes globaux qui menacent l'environnement au sens large et qui constituent des enjeux planétaires : changements climatiques, consommation énergétique, prolifération nucléaire. La méthode de Greenpeace repose en partie sur des actions directes non-violentes parfois très médiatisées, qui ont fait sa renommée. S'appuyant sur les retombées de ces actions pour informer les médias et le public, l'organisation agit aussi en tant que lobby auprès des autorités politiques et des dirigeants d'entreprises afin de promouvoir les changements appropriés. L’occupation d’une plateforme en Arctique est juste : territoire menacé, si trop de pétrole est extrait cela met en danger la banquise qui disparait plus vite. Prirazlomnaya est la première......

Words: 365 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Phillips Business

...Marketing Plan Greenpeace Project Group 2 Greenpeace Project Coach: Study Year : Date of Marketing Plan: Helen de Haan 2010-2011 Feb-instroom, term 2, project 2 31-05-2010 1 Preface This marketing plan provides a comprehensive strategic plan for the NGO Greenpeace. It is aimed for Executive Managers and those who will conduct supervision of the implementation of this marketing plan. The marketing plan does not focus on technical issues, but rather examines basic principals concerning the internal- and external environment, strategy execution and the result realized after execution. To reinforce the purpose and profitable outcome of the marketing plan, there are, throughout this manuscript, numerous illustrative extracts with commentary, including company reports and other sources. Throughout the text some marketing- and financial terminology is used, for this reason foreknowledge of marketing and finance will be essential in understanding the analysis used in this manuscript and the true purpose of the strategic plan. Topics in the manuscript follow a logical coherent order. In part 1; general information about the internal- and external environment of Greenpeace is given, correctly identifying potential internal- and external threats and opportunities that may be in effect. After an exhaustive and thorough analysis, the information collected will be instrumental in conjuring up an efficient and effective marketing strategy which is clearly laid out in Part 2;......

Words: 12016 - Pages: 49

Free Essay

Greenpeace and Palm Oil

...forest to survive. The growers don’t have a lot of resources to work around the rain forest issue so they take land away from the orangutan to provide for their families. The World Wildlife Fund and Little Brownie Bakers have opposing stakes in this issue. World Wildlife Fund is interested in saving the animals that live in the rain forest from destruction. They oppose cutting down the rain forest to make way for plantations. Little Brownie Bakers is interested in quality ingredients for their products. With no clear alternative to palm oil they need a supplier that can produce enough palm oil to meet demand. They buy from a plantation that is cutting down rainforest and that is in conflict with the goals of World Wildlife Fund. Both Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund have a shared interest in this issue. By combining their efforts they might be able to have a greater impact on the issue. As the old saying goes two heads are better than one. They could see a benefit by sharing resources and information. This could give them an advantage and help them stay a few steps ahead the bakers and growers. They would also have the benefit of larger numbers working together to inform more people about the issue than either of them alone could do. Another pair of stakeholders with shared interest is Mars and Nestle. They both need a supply of ingredients to make their products. By both R and D departments working together they could come up with a solution faster than if they......

Words: 892 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Toying with Indonesia's Deforestation

...or inclusive of paper materials, such as instruction manual. Greenpeace has alleged Mattel’s usage of MTH in their products packaging, while Mattel in another occasion emphasizes their company’s paper policy, stating “… Our Barbie Thumbelina line of toys uses 100% recyclable cardboard in packaging and provides instructions on how to recycle”. Not only they stated their packaging is environmental friendly, but also the company’s annual report, philanthropy and global citizenship reports have been printed on FSC-certified paper. They also emphasizes that they’ve recommend their paper suppliers and printers to use the latest FSC-approved paper stocks to print ‘Mattel’s other printed materials’. Mattel also works with third parties companies, such as Amazon.com to eliminate unnecessary additional packaging when their products is shipped to consumers. Besides, Mattel also requires the third parties manufacturers and licensees to meet Mattel’s own independent certification for all materials, including paper products, such as packaging, in terms of the exclusion or limitation use of hazardous chemicals. In a blink of an eye, it does sound as if Mattel is giving its’ best to save the environment, in using environmental friendly materials. However, Mattel does not require any of its third parties manufacturers, printing companies or licensees to avoid trade with companies involved in deforestation, such as APP. Greenpeace investigations not only revealed trade links between Mattel......

Words: 2885 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Greenpeace

...Greenpeace Date Formed: 1971 History and Mission of the institution: In 1971, motivated by their vision of a green and peaceful world, a small team of activists set sail from Vancouver, Canada in an old fishing boat. These activists, the founders of Greenpeace, believed a few individuals could make a difference. Their mission was to ‘bear witness’ to US nuclear testing at Amchitka, a tiny island off the West Coast of Alaska, which is one of the world's most earthquake-prone regions. Amchitka was the last refuge for 3000 endangered sea otters, and home to bald eagles, peregrine falcons and other wildlife. Even though their old boat, the Phyllis Cormack, was intercepted before it got to Amchitka, the journey sparked a flurry of public interest. The US still detonated the bomb, but the voice of reason had been heard. Nuclear testing on Amchitka ended that same year, and the island was later declared a bird sanctuary. Members of the institution: The Greenpeace organisation consists of Greenpeace International in Amsterdam and Greenpeace offices in 41 countries around the world. Each office is governed by a board, which appoints a representative called a trustee.  Roles * Examine the effect of human activities on the environment * Make information known to the public * Make information known to the public * Relieve sickness and suffering of humans and animals caused by environmental issues UK involvement in this institution: * Greenpeace UK is part of...

Words: 552 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Market and Nonmarket Issues

... Market and Non-Market Strategy to deal with Non-Market Issue By (Student Name :) Foundation Course- Tutor: Institution: Date: 1. Issue Greenpeace Company, Indian branch, has for the last one month suffered administrative and political fallout with the Indian authorities over what it calls ‘strangulation by stealth.’ (Bhalla 2015). According to Aulakh (2015), there is a public struggle between the Indian government and Greenpeace, who see it as a “threat” to national development. Further, a report from an intelligence unit from India showed how a campaigner from Australia working for Greenpeace was denied entry into the country sourcing him as a major threat towards the government. Bhalla (2015) further narrates how the organization faced closure due to foreign funding being blocked for a month and registration suspension for six months. In a statement to the newsrooms, the NDA responded to claims of the closure of Greenpeace foreign account. They claimed that the organization was violating the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) and tax laws (Singh 2015). The stated law scrutinizes NGO’S of ‘political nature’ and bars them from obtaining donations from the international partners (Bhalla 2015). Moreover, in January 2012, the NGO’s senior campaigner Priya Pillai was also stopped from boarding a plane to London. The government cited her as the source of problems it was facing at the time (Business Standard 2015). Needless to note, she was only fighting for the......

Words: 2841 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Week 1 Hum 111

...produces the most pollution within the U.S. I admire what the Greenpeace organization does because they are trying to get factories/companies to stop burning coal and other fossil fuels and start a clean energy movement. I think companies need organizations like this to make them realize that their processes are really destroying our planet at a rapid rate and something really needs to be done to conserve some of the natural resources and not destroy our planet so quickly. Not only are America’s coal-burning plants destroying our planet, but they are also making our children sick, poisoning our waters and air, and killing tens of thousands of innocent people every year. Again, according to ("Global Warming And Climate Changes", 2012) over the next few years Greenpeace will be doing a few things to start the clean energy movement. First, Greenpeace will be joining local communities together to shut down dangerous, dirty coal plants all over the United States. Second, Greenpeace will be advocating for strong laws to stop global warming and get America on track with the clean energy movement. Third, Greenpeace will be exposing climate deniers and hold them publicly accountable for providing millions of dollars to lobby against climate and clean energy policies. Finally, Greenpeace will be kick-starting an energy revolution by advocating for clean energy solutions like solar and wind power. I think that what Greenpeace is trying to do is very moral and if I knew how I would......

Words: 431 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Hum/111 Greenpeace

...Greenpeace future in store for us? Greenpeace is an environmental organization that strives to make our environment a better and healthier place to live. Saving energy and helping animals survive is their one key mission to all activists who volunteer within this organization. With toxic waste, global warming, and pollution in our waters, this organization always has their hands full. Toxic waste is a huge issue for me, both personally and morally. Personally, toxic waste wouldn’t be an issue if everyone did their part in taking care and cleaning up after themselves. There are so many people who don’t know how to recycle, thus leads to more toxic waste and chemicals for surrounding areas. Landfills of trash can affect surrounding areas all over the proximity to where the plant is located. Chemicals, also known as “toxic waste,” are released into our environment everyday causing bad pollution all over for us human beings and animals. It can harm ourselves as well as all the things in the environment around us including: water, air, and land. Some examples of toxic waste can include: military weapons, car exhausts, cosmetics, and electronic devices. One major issue considering the toxic waste is Hi-tech devices such as cell phones, computers, and Ipods. When consumers buy new electronic devices, they throw their old ones away, not realizing that it can be hazardous to us and our environment. Technology advances every other month it seems like, and people as consumers want to...

Words: 455 - Pages: 2