Premium Essay

Euthanasia Essay

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By leanna9288
Words 2596
Pages 11
Euthanasia: Quality Above Quantity Inin Life and Death Leanna Smith Cuyahoga Community College ENG 1010 Professor Neel July 20, 2014

Author Note
This outline research paper’s final draft was prepared as part of a research project for English 1020, taught by Professor Neel.

Abstract Euthanasia is commonly known as physician-assisted suicide. This is the act of a physician providing a terminally ill patient with lethal drugs and administers the drugs in a safe environment. Assisted suicide on the other hand is when the physician or pharmacist prescribes the lethal drugs for the terminally ill patient to take at a time of his or her own choosing. Assisted suicide is legal in 3 states in the United States, while euthanasia is illegal in every state. There are many arguments for and against this debate. The objections are mainly moral or ethical. There are many benefits to allowing assisted suicide in the United States, a couple of them are: less suffering for the patients, keeping the patients’ debts low, and keeping medical resources available for those with hope for more than 6 months to live. Oregon has provided the United States a good example of a state providing an opportunity for a terminally ill patient to control his or her own future. Hopefully with the first 3 states leading the way, the rest of the country will follow.

Euthanasia: Quality Above Quantity in Life and Death “A dying man needs to die, as a sleepy man needs to sleep, and there comes a time when it is wrong, as well as useless, to resist.” This quote by Stewart Alsop sums up what this paper is about in one, short, witty sentence. We live in an age of quick fixes and treatments for every ailment. Life expectancy is double what it was 100 years ago and yet life has gotten harder.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...16th, 2012 Persuasive Essay Euthanasia, Mercy Killing or Murder? Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are the methods for helping patients to release their pain and suffering by using either medication or other comfortable methods. There are many arguments about these issues had been rising up from many different aspects, such as the actual definition of euthanasia and its practice; the physicians’ responsibilities and opinions; and ethics and religions stance of euthanasia. In my opinion, euthanasia and physician assisted suicide should be prohibited completely in all hospitals. Euthanasia is a physician purposely kills a patient by drugs with the approval from that person. Euthanasia can divide into two categories: passive and active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is withdrawing any life-sustaining treatment (Palliate Medicine - 2011). In the other hand, active euthanasia is using drugs under administration of a physician. It can be voluntary, with the permission of the patients; involuntary, without a permission of a patient; and non-voluntary, with the permission of the second party due to the physical or mental condition of a patient (Health Policy – 2010). Involuntary is performing against the patient’s will, which is completely illegal. Active voluntary and non-voluntary are the main consideration of the society nowadays. One of the studies has shown the estimation of the percentage of deaths in the United Kingdom that involved euthanasia to be 0.16%......

Words: 1187 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Robert Regan English 151 C. Weimmer Persuasive essay Euthanasia: It Should Be One's Right To Choose Euthanasia is the act of "killing" someone, by taking away their life support, upon a patients request. When a patient is "terminally ill," they are being kept alive with new technology, and are basically just living bodies. Most of them are suffering. "Pulling the plug," or taking the patient off life support, is illegal all across the world. I think this is wrong. We are not responsible for being born, yet if we feel we have led a long fulfilling life, than we should have the right to not be on life support. This topic has been debated for years. They tried to make it legal in Europe, but it was overturned. There are some concerns about the term "terminally ill." Some people believe that voluntary euthanasia can somehow turn into involuntary euthanasia. For example, when people get to a certain age, they sometimes get diseases that damages their state of consciousness. Some of these include, Altzimers, and Dimentia, and these people can't tell left from right, or what is going on in a certian situation. These are the people who fall in the gray area of the debate. If euthanasia were legalized, it would have to be completely voluntary. If you were the closest person to the patient, and the doctor tells you, that your mother's condition of life is painful, and there is no recovering for her, what would you say? Would you just let her sit there in a vegatative......

Words: 487 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...being As a human being, people who agree with euthanasia should shame on their ignorance about evolution of human kind. I know that this would be quiet mean to say, but I will be willing to blame them for our future generation. Important thing that people should keep in mind for human kind is that we obviously could not have been evolved as an intellectual human without respecting of human life. Since primitive era, human kind has kept trying to develop the human value by improving our livings; technology has made human living better and more convenient. As technology has become tremendously beneficial to us, our value of lives became more noble and precious, however, the convenience that human created is now ironically threatening human value. As I will discuss in this essay, I strongly disagree with euthanasia that would weaken and sicken human soul. There is no doubt that euthanasia will be spoiling human kind. At least if you are human being, you should consider about our next generation. If we accept euthanasia, we would confront with three major problem; confronting with protests held by religious people ,abusing the law, and devalue of human life. The term “euthanasia” comes from the Greek words “good death”. The general idea of euthanasia is comfortable death for someone who wants to die either voluntary or non-voluntary (Goel Vaibhav, 2008). Despite of the origin of the meaning, euthanasia does not seem to be comfortable death. I......

Words: 1383 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...(Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig’s disease), a condition affecting motor neurons of brain and spinal cord. Her prognosis was a short life expectancy that had the prospect of a slow and painful death, and eventual complete paralysis, while remaining mentally competent throughout the process. Therefore, Sue requested the right to participate in voluntary euthanasia to have the option to end her own life with dignity. The law in Canada prohibits physician assisted suicide, so she challenged the law in court. However, the British Columbian court ruled in majority against Rodriguez. Rodriguez then appealed the court’s decision to the Supreme Court of British Columbia but the court had dismissed her appeal to participate in voluntary euthanasia with one dissenting judge and forwarded it to the parliament. The final decision made by the parliament was brought before the supreme court of Canada, which resulted in a 5-4 majority decision in favor of the current law that criminalized physician assisted suicide. Sue Rodriguez case embodies a serious ethical dilemma. It raised many philosophical and moral issues; this essay will analyze the various issues that justify the Supreme Court of Canada’s majority decision verses the dissenting judges. The key arguments that Rodriguez made in court were section 241(b) of the criminal code of Canada. Section 241(b) states that: anyone who aids or abets a person to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an......

Words: 1991 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Essay About Euthanasia

...I/ About euthanasia I think a question should be asks, should people be forced to stay alive ? And obviously the answer is no. And neither the law or medical, ethics requires that « Everything should be done » if the patient doesn‘t want it. The law which have been repeted by The Supreme court has reiterated in a number of rulings-that the right to freedom is a fundamental right and freedom includes having control over one’s body = (plusieurs déclarations, la Cour suprême rappelle constamment que le droit à la liberté est un droit fondamental, et cette liberté comprend celle de disposer de son corps. ) Just to give an example the criminal in Canada Second, under subsection 88 (1) a) and b) of the Act Corrections and Conditional Release, the administration of any treatment is subject to free and informed consent of the prisoner, which may refuse to follow or continue. Every prisoner has the right to refuse to undergo treatment or discontinue treatment at any time undertaken. Even criminals have these right, the mentalities are changing. Another point of my argument is Insistence, against the patient's wishes, that death be postponed (= reportée ) by every means available and sometimes with the use of medecines like the Morphine is. That signifie that the pain is so hard to support that the patients should be high ! Moreover with the time the pain of the patients may be increased. It would be cruel and inhumane to let this be done. There comes a time when......

Words: 614 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Against Humanity: Euthanasia Tolga Arslan ESL 160-03: Combined Skills VI Professor Roxanne Leach April 24, 2013 Tolga Arslan 4/24/2013 ESL 160-3 Library Report Essay Professor Roxanne Leach Against Humanity: Euthanasia Euthanasia is a serious political, moral, and ethical issue in today’s society. Euthanasia is putting people in a painless death or when terminally ill people choose to end his or her life with a doctor’s help. The word euthanasia comes from Greek “eu”, goodly or well and “thanatos” death, so it is good death. This short definition is a cause of all those debates all over the world. Doctors, politicians, religious leaders, lawyers, and general public argue for euthanasia, whether it should be legalized or not. Euthanasia is a serious topic because it goes against the standards of traditional medicine. First, doctors have to take the Hippocratic Oath to become a real doctor. The Hippocratic Oath says do whatever you can to save people’s life. Euthanasia says just kill them if they want to die. Which doctor can kill their client if they have taken the Hippocratic Oath or if they are real doctors? Second, euthanasia is not always applied to terminally ill patients either. People who have been in serious accidents, or who have debilitating diseases are often consideration for the application of euthanasia. The problem is, these patients are neither in a coma nor senseless. According to http://www.euthanasia.cc, “A pair of identical twins has died......

Words: 1073 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Marc Vinkler E1 d. 04-12-2011 Essay - about euthanasia What happens when a patient is terminal ill and decides for euthanasia? What would you do if it was a member of your family? Many people have not done any considerations about the question. Is it because we are afraid of the thought, or because we are convinced that we would not end up in the situation? Do you think that people should have the right to decide whether they would like euthanasia or live on with an incurable illness or a paralyzed body? The word euthanasia comes from Greek and means good death. But is euthanasia a good way to die? You can answer that question with two widely different points of view. When a person has been involved in a car accident, where he got paralyzed and also suffers from a lot of pain. Most people would agree that it is best to take the medicine from the person if he or she begs to die. In that way you can say that it is a good death because the person escapes from the pain hell. But if a person makes the wrong decision because depression and ignorance it is tragic. Because in some cases you can actually have a relatively good life even though you are paralyzed. Just read the story about Vivian Berzinski who was paralyzed in 1972 when she was 17 years old. Her doctors felt she would never be able to move, never be able to talk and never be able to breathe without a respirator. But since then she armed only with the love of her family and her own fierce will, she has......

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Euthanasia

...Argument Essay Rough Draft Local Views and Legislation of Euthanasia Euthanasia is defined in Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary as; “1. Dying easily, quietly, and painlessly. 2. The act of willfully ending life in individuals with an incurable disease. Ethical considerations of this act are being actively debated. One difficulty is how will the physician or society determine that the time for acting to kill the patient has come.” (Taber, Pg. 683). I choose this particular dictionary to reference the definition of euthanasia specifically because of the detailed explanation that ethical considerations are being actively debated. Some may contend that euthanasia is a practice to be upheld in the U.S.A. due to being a country of freedom and liberty, and that is kind to allow one’s suffering to stop. However, others remain opposed and stand firm on the notion that assisting death is unethical, un-Godly, and to be illegal. The debate of assisted-suicide is argumentative amongst society, doctors, and legislators in Hawaii and throughout the nation; with recent regards to changing current law, euthanasia should remain to be illegal. Assisting in death, encouraging death, and advocating for death is wrong in many ways. Societal opinions differ and are found to be expressed throughout Hawaii in organizations, churches, and personal testimonials. What causes one to even think that assisted suicide is an acceptable foreseeable option? An example pros for debate is the......

Words: 1632 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Euthanasia Essay

...Euthanasia Essay Friedrich Nietzsche once said: "To live is to suffer, to survive is to find some meaning in the suffering. Life is hard, but if we survive it, then we'll understand it. The controversy behind euthanasia essentially revolves around the simple question "Who has the choice in my own death?"People think of this in two ways; either they strictly forbid it or are firmly in favor to it; however I believe that there is a vast area of grey. Though I can’t hold grudge against the idea of euthanasia, I am opposed the fact of encouraging it in our society. I know it is allowed in some countries, but I think it should not be permitted in any circumstances. While I can understand the logic of its supporters, I believe that tolerance is the equal of corruption. People can go on for ages discussing what's right and wrong about euthanasia, but I want to address a number of the arguments that I found most important which are the mistakes made to kill innocent lives, euthanasia and the law, and voluntary euthanasia. Euthanasia itself as a theory is quite cruel. It disregards the means of hope. For such a recent practice it is hard to pinpoint its consequences. It is often hard to tell the difference between the victims and the family. As a fact, euthanasia is illegal in Canada. People who euthanize can violate the patient's rights, create an economic burden, interfere with a doctor's job, or increase suffering among them. It is never easy to watch your loved ones suffer,......

Words: 966 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Euthanasia

...Argumentative Essay: Euthanasia Euthanasia is another term for mercy killing. It is usually done by doctors to their patients who are terminally ill. Although euthanasia is done by doctors in certain situations to patients and is legal in some countries, euthanasia should not be practiced or be legalized because it devalues lives, it might become involuntary and doctors should cure and not kill. According to the article “Euthanasia: Arguments Against Euthanasia”, people might think that death is better than being sick. They might think that death is the only solution to problems. People who support euthanasia say that it is done as self-defense. For example, a soldier is brutally wounded and might die if not treated immediately. Is partner decides to ask his consent for euthanasia to end his suffering. Killing for self-defense means that you kill to save another one’s life but in euthanasia, you do not save anyone’s life. Euthanasia devalues lives because it tells us that we can take our or someone’s life easily. Euthanasia is done to a person with his consent. It is the decision of that person if he wants to do it. According to the article “Arguments Against Euthanasia”, people might decide to go for euthanasia because of emotional and psychological pressures. For example, a patient is suffering because of an illness and his doctor said to him that it is better for him to die. That person might go for it because he suffers too much and his doctor said that it is......

Words: 416 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...IssUEs Of EUThANAsIA: ARGUmENTATIvE EssAy Bilal S. H. Badr Naga Majd T. Mrayyan (1) Bilal S. H. Badr Naga., MSN, RN, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center in Qassim, Saudi Arabia (2) Majd T. Mrayyan., Prof, RN, The Hashemite University, Jordan Correspondence: Bilal S. H. Badr Naga., MSN, RN, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center in Qassim, Saudi Arabia Email: Bilal_badrnaga@yahoo.com Case scenario Abstract Euthanasia is one of the issues that has been the subject of intense debate over time. It has been a pertinent issue in human rights discourse as it also affects ethical and legal issues pertaining to patients and health care providers. This paper discusses the legal and ethical debates concerning both types of euthanasia. It focuses on both the supporter of euthanasia and the opponent of euthanasia. Several statements for the Euthanasia argument arediscussed: a merciful response that alleviates the suffering of patients which is sometimes wrongly perceived to be otherwise unrelievable; the autonomy in which the patient has the right to make his own choices; the regulation and legislation of existing practices of euthanasia to protect health care providers and patients. In this heated debate religious, political, ethical, legal and personal views are also included. Among all these, those who desperately want to end their lives because they simply cannot go on in any way, are the ones who suffer. Every individual or group has a different viewpoint regarding euthanasia. Euthanasia is......

Words: 7058 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Advantages and Disadvantages of Euthanasia Discursive Essay Diara Utebay ID 20140542 Academic Reading and Writing 1 Yelena Zhacheva SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 Discursive Essay Outline Essay question: Should the whole world recognize physician-assisted suicide? I. Introduction Thesis statement: Euthanasia would be recognized by the entire world because physician-assisted suicide leads to easily leaving our world without any pain and suffering and it is another case of freedom of choice. However, mercy-killing is contrary to the Hippocratic Oath. II. Body A. Main idea 1: Euthanasia changes view of life, thereby helps not to be afraid of pain before death 1. It improves quality of life. 2. The best way to relieve the pains. 3. Death is the opposite of life, but the process of dying is part of life. B. Main idea 2: Physician-assisted suicide is another case of freedom of choice 1. If the dying process is unpleasant, people should have the right to shorten it. 2. Countries which protect rights of their citizens. C. Main idea: Mercy-killing is contrary to the Hippocratic Oath. 1. Doctor’s job is to protect and save life. 2. Providing deadly drugs is contrary to the oath. III. Conclusion Everything goes to the fact that euthanasia will be recognized by the entire world, however, medical professionals are not in hurry to make the most important decision, which is related to euthanasia. It has been argued that euthanasia is one of the most......

Words: 1592 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia Some people will argue that the right to live includes the right to die, while other argues that death is the opposite of life. This last point is based on a belief that the process of dying is part of life, and death is therefore not seen as a right. This essay is written based on the points put forth in the article “India rejects euthanasia plea over nurse brain damaged in 1973 sex assault” from the newspaper Guardian. This article discusses a topic, which is most commonly considered a taboo, namely, euthanasia. The article tells the story of a 60-years old Indian woman, who has suffered severe brain damage during a sexual assault, more than 35 years ago. Furthermore, it also discusses whether it should be legal to “pull the plug” on terminally ill patients who are only surviving because of the life support provided by the hospital. Helping someone die this way is exactly what euthanasia is. Personally, I think of life as an expression of freedom; every human being needs to be able to act as freely as possible. I believe that each person should have the right to control his or her life and thereby also be able to determine whether they want to live or die. India’s philosophy on life differs from mine in some ways. Euthanasia used to be illegal in India. However, in a recent trial the Indian Supreme Court ruled that, in rare cases, euthanasia should be available as an option, such as Aruna Shanbaugs’. As I mentioned before, I do not think that the government,...

Words: 669 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia Legislation surrounding both euthanasia and assisted suicide sparks much debate in Queensland’s legal and political systems. Despite a society largely proponents of euthanasia, political and legislative institutions rear firm in their stance against its legalisation. It is evident that as a society progresses, so too do the ideological views of those within; so why is it that Queensland legislators have done nothing in the way of legalising euthanasia? Much of this notion can be attributed to a mere political debate; however, euthanasia and assisted suicide are extremely controversial and in order to delve deep enough into the issue, the religious, legal, cultural, ethical and medical ramifications need to be explored. Often referred to as ‘mercy killing,’ euthanasia is defined as the ‘deliberate causing of death of a person suffering from an incurable disease or condition.’ (‘Euthanasia’ 2009) Although advocators see it as a way to relieve immense pain and suffering, many see euthanasia not as a ‘right to die’ but as a ‘right to kill’- ultimately ‘weakening society’s respect for the sanctity of life.’ (‘BBC’, 2013) In recent years, state and commonwealth governments have made significant changes and reforms to euthanasia law, although the effectiveness and validity of such changes are somewhat questionable. The purpose of this essay is to address the legal principles and relevant legislation regarding euthanasia, any issues surrounding the efficacy of such law...

Words: 2747 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia Argument Essay By Isabel Planes Grade 10 Mr. Brower Euthanasia is a worldwide controversy “… [That] can be traced back to ancient times” (Text 1, Line 12). Although many people may have opposing views on the practice, patients who are experiencing “…unbearable pain [should have] the right to commit suicide” (Text 1, Line 35) and to “[die] with dignity” (Text 1, Line 4). To begin with, the Greeks came up with the name for the practice, Euthanasia, “…which means a good death” (Text 1, Line 11). Euthanasia is considered a “good death” because it prevents dying patients from experiencing the “…slow, painful, and humiliating period before [their] biological death” (Text 3, Line 66). Take Derek Humphry, the founder of the Hemlock society’s wife, for example. “…Humphry’s wife died of cancer, in great, unmitigated pain at the end. He believed that such agony was cruel and unnecessary and advocated euthanasia to end the lives of dying patients” (Text 3, Line 31). Through his experience it is made apparent that chronic illnesses such as cancer can end in a very cruel death which is painful for both the patient to experience and for the patients loved ones to watch. Furthermore, “today a person facing a degenerative death has a limited number of choices available…” (Text 3, Line 51). A lot of times they are left “…in great pain, immobile, experiencing urinary and bowel incontinence, a loss of dignity, and totally dependent......

Words: 551 - Pages: 3