Free Essay


In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By pereztj01
Words 857
Pages 4

Eudaimonia is what everyone strives to be. Aristotle (384 BC-322 BC) believes that happiness is the highest or central good in human life and is what we all aim for. Happiness is the ultimate end we all aim for, as it is the end in and of itself. Unlike, for example, going to the gym to work out and the end goal is being healthy, feeling, and looking better. This is not the end of the means of working out. In being healthy after working out, you lead yourself to living a longer life, and there is another end goal after this. What Aristotle tries to reach or answer in Nicomachean Ethics, is how to reach eudaimonia. “Nonetheless, happiness evidently also needs external goods to be added, as we said, since we cannot, or cannot easily, do fine actions if we lack the resources …” Aristotle believes that external goods such as wealth, power, and friends are all used to reach eudaimonia. We need external goods such as these in order to succeed and prosper in our endgame of reaching happiness, as it will be extremely hard without these goods. Aristotle deems that happiness needs to have prosperity or wealth, opulence, luxury, and the good life in order to be achieved. As prosperity tends to be associated with success and affluence, some people identify happiness as good fortune. This good fortune has results from favorable outcomes, good luck, destiny, and fate. Other people associate happiness with virtue. Virtue is the way people act in showing high moral standards. This focuses on the individual and includes virtues of being moral, having integrity, dignity, rectitude, honor, and decency. Aristotle states that it will be much harder for us to reach eudaimonia if we don’t use our external goods, because resources help us achieve our endgame much faster with guarantee. In realizing how much those goods help us along the way, so many people believe happiness is an affect or is directly related to good fortune. According to Aristotle, happiness is not pleasure (good fortune) or virtue. We do not need good luck in order to be happy. Happiness is the exercise of virtue and cannot be achieved until the end of one’s life, which is why it is an end goal and not a brief state. Our happiness is achieved and depends on gaining ethical charm in which we are aloud to show our bravery, rapport, righteousness, and social responsibility within our lives. Once those ethical character traits are gained we strike the balance between the scarcity and surplus or “mean”. Material possessions, such as those that come with good fortune like wealth, are not necessary but are useful in the steps we take towards happiness. For example, if we have a tremendous amount of wealth we can choose to align that with our virtue of helping others. In giving back to our communities or those less fortunate, we are returning our fortune to those whom need it as much as we do instead of keeping it for ourselves and being selfish. In time, when our lives begin to come to a close, we will be another step closer to reaching eudaimonia. Aristotle’s argument is clear in regards to his point that happiness is only achieved by the very few who are essentially blessed or born from the gods. His view of happiness is similar to the view of the one percent who run the country with their wealth and belief that they are the single elite. He is very clear when he says that if you miss or fail in just one of his requirements, you fail in totality in trying to reach eudaimonia. Although his argument is clear, it is not logical and convincing. I find it hard to believe that only the elite few who achieve all of Aristotle’s requirements may reach eudaimonia. If people who are genuinely good and have moral virtues are denounced of their “happiness” because of one day of anger or a mistake, that does not mean they have not reached eudaimonia. We as human beings are people of emotions, flaws, mistakes, greatness, and happiness. Most days we may live in happiness, but those days when we are trifled with sadness, are days that make us “real” human beings, people who care. This idea of happiness being achieved by true perfection is flawed, as we are not robots who can only think on settings and feel nothing.
In closing, I believe true eudaimonia is doing what we love for the benefit of our family, our society, and ourselves. We are allowed to make mistakes as long as we learn from them and try to better them. Happiness can be achieved by anyone who accepts who he or she is as a person and who chooses to truly live. If you accept all of your flaws and do what you can to better yourself and stay positive even in tough times, you will be happy. When you do struggle you will grow from your problems and become a better person. Happiness is the journey not the result. This is true eudaimonia.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Aristotle: Eudaimana

...Aristotle believed all human activities are aimed at “eudaimonia” or happiness. He believed that what makes human beings distinct from other living things is our capacity for rational behaviour, gaining knowledge and acting on reasons. He believed to live a good life is to live a life of practical knowledge and that this is similar to living a life of virtue. Aristotle concluded that a virtue is a learned disposition to reason and act in a certain way. Virtues are habits of mind that move us towards a good life. Virtue ethics, its most famous form from Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, focus on what sort of people we should strive to be and not just that things we should do on individual occasions. Moral dilemmas are usually situations in which there are two choices to make, neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. Hence in business, virtue ethics requires leaders to act in a way that they will increase their contributions to the good life. All business leaders will inevitably face moral dilemmas. In navigating through these dilemmas, virtue ethics and reason tell the business leaders to follow the character traits that upon, contemplation and reflection, they view as consistent with virtue. An art director, with a team of designers and illustrators, overseeing the promotion efforts of their new toy is “strongly” persuaded by his boss to “borrow” copyrighted design material and schematics from another overseas toy firm. His boss...

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Aristotelianism vs. Buddhism

...greatest contributors. He believed that humans were distinctly defined by their character traits rather than their behavior. Aristotle supported this belief by explaining the concept of achieving eudaimonia through living virtuously. Through evaluating his theory of human nature we are given the answers to three of the most common questions humans face today. These common questions are: 1. What should we strive for, and how do we achieve this goal? 2. What makes us special if anything? 3. What tends to go wrong in the pursuit of our goal? Aristotle teaches, “everyone aims, ultimately, for eudaimonia”. Eudaimonia is the Greek term, which means human flourishing. For the ancient Greeks, the term flourishing relates to one being successful in life. “Aristotle realizes, of course, that there are many different opinions about just what eudaimonia is” (to be successful). “In order to sort through these opinions, separating the plausible from the true, Aristotle discerns three preconditions for a proper understanding of eudaimonia”. “According to Aristotle, whatever eudaimonia is, it must be such as to be final, self sufficient, and the end of action”. In order for eudaimonia to be final, it cannot be achieved for the sake of something else. This means that our goal of achieving eudaimonia should not serve to meet another goal. A good example of a non-final goal would be one setting their goal to make a million dollars. However, the only reason they want a million dollars......

Words: 2230 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Analyzing Virtue Theory

...will be a sufficient philosophy to help the two clearly decide what action to take regarding their dilemmas. First though, we must look again at the origin of virtue. Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics, discusses the concept of “eudaimonia”, which translates from Greek to mean well-being, happiness, or, especially in the context of virtue ethics, human flourishing. Aristotle argued that eudaimonia, or the pursuit of eudaimonia, is the action that exactly aligned with perfect virtue. Hence, the most perfect virtue is to allow whatever would allow the humans to flourish most. Taking this concept into account, it becomes clear how a virtue theorist would resolve the previously stated conflicts. Though not immediately obvious what the doctor’s best and most virtuous course of action would be, when taking into account that human flourishing goes hand-in-hand with the promotion of life, the choice becomes more evident. Despite the suffering that a terminal patient may endure, death is the direct opposite of human flourishing, and life of any quality should be placed at a higher value according to the virtue theory. Thus the doctor will choose to keep the patient alive, providing him with the best comfort within his power. Keeping the virtue theory and eudaimonia in mind, the decision involving the stranger-in-hiding becomes even more obvious, as the protection of the human life holds more value than the societally instituted values of honor and loyalty. Based on virtue theory, the......

Words: 1904 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...question of what one is to do. Knowledge in this area can be described as one who does or follows the norm. • Practical intelligence is the ability that individuals use to find the best fit between themselves and the demands of their surroundings. Knowledge in this area can be described as one who assesses their resources and/or surroundings to make the best immediate decision for who to proceed. 3. Why does Aristotle say that ethics is not an exact science? • Aristotle says that every theory needs to be as exact as its subject matter. In the realm of conduct though, there are no exact rules. Consequently, a theory of conduct cannot have any exact rules either. 4. Is happiness or eudaimonia a feeling in Aristotle’s ethics? What does it consist in? • Yes, happiness or eudaimonia is a feeling in Aristotle’s ethics. However Aristotle believed that happiness is a matter of evaluating or assessing a whole life not a moment or immediate feeling. 5. In order for an action to be done in accordance with excellence of character what three conditions must be satisfied? • One must know what he's doing. • One must choose the action because it is what they want to do (no outside influence) • One must take pleasure in performing virtuous acts 6. How are the virtues acquired? (think of “ethos” or habituation.) • Ethos are characteristics developed from a persons, childhood/up-bringing, culture, era, or community, beliefs and aspirations which is what develops......

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...CLEMENTINA DIKE JEFFERSON COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES PHYLOSOPHY 115 (Critical Thinking) Eudaimonia means flourishing. For Aristotle, Eudaimonia is a habitual, virtuous activity, it is continuous. Eudaimonia is something that is proper to the person and that cannot be taken away. It does not depend on pleasures of life or honor bestowed on one by people which are temporary. It is a life rational living throughout ones life. Eudaimoina is the good that we all seek or should seek because it is full development and exercise of our human capacities in accordance with excellence or virtue throughout our entire life. For one to be happy, all his choices should be done in a good and excellent way – a life of reason which cannot be taken away. According to Aristotle, the defining function of a human being is “activity of soul in accordance with reason. ”He asserts that guiding our emotions with reason or being rational in an excellent way, according to virtue could lead to happiness. Virtue (Arête) is a life of excellence. It is a disposition to choose in a certain way, which is appropriate to that virtue. It encompasses all things, it is not partial. Virtue is learnt by practice and repetition. It is not inborn. It should be learned from childhood so that one does not need to struggle within himself to do good but is emotionally attached to doing good. Intellectual virtue is the innate understanding of the character virtue as being good and their......

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Aristotles Eudaimonia

...ARISTOTLE'S EUDAIMONIA Eudaimonia stands for happiness in Greek. Aristotle argues that the highest good for human beings is happiness. He insists that every action performed by humans is to pursue happiness. Aristotle also argues that human action is always aimed at some end or good. This "good" may not be viewed as a good action or any good by others, but for the doer of the action ("good"), the activity will be perceived as good and that it will bring a favorable outcome. Aristotle also said that all of our actions resulting in ends or goods form a hierarchy. This hierarchy, incorporates a ladder of things, and this ladder would categorize things according to their importance. And the most important thing would be on top of the ladder, thus being the ultimate end. This ultimate end is what all the actions aim to reach at or achieve. [This end must be self-sufficient, it must be attainable and it must be what we want]1. Therefore, because happiness includes all these, then it must be the highest good. An example of this ladder could be a person working hard to lose weight or trying to stay in shape. The bottom step of the ladder is the person working out in a gym, but why is the person working out? To lose weight or maintain their shape. Why does the person want to lose weight or maintain their shape? To look good physically and to be healthy. Why does the person want to look good or be healthy? To be attractive and to lead a stress-less and a comfortable life. And why......

Words: 1620 - Pages: 7

Free Essay


...------------------------------------------------- Philosophy Cynicism is one of the most striking of all the Hellenistic philosophies.[8] It offered people the possibility of happiness and freedom from suffering in an age of uncertainty. Although there was never an official Cynic doctrine, the fundamental principles of Cynicism can be summarised as follows:[9][10][11] 1. The goal of life is Eudaimonia and mental clarity or lucidity (ἁτυφια) - freedom from τύφος (smoke) which signified ignorance, mindlessness, folly, and conceit. 2. Eudaimonia is achieved by living in accord with Nature as understood by human reason. 3. τύφος (Arrogance) is caused by false judgments of value, which cause negative emotions, unnatural desires, and a vicious character. 4. Eudaimonia or human flourishing, depends on self-sufficiency (αὐτάρκεια), equanimity, arete, love of humanity, parrhesia and indifference to the vicissitudes of life (ἁδιαφορία). 5. One progresses towards flourishing and clarity through ascetic practices (ἄσκησις) which help one become free from influences – such as wealth, fame, or power – that have no value in Nature. Examples include Diogenes' practice of living in a tub and walking barefoot in winter. 6. A Cynic practices shamelessness or impudence (Αναιδεια) and defaces the Nomos of society; the laws, customs, and social conventions which people take for granted. Thus a Cynic has no property and rejects all conventional values of money, fame,......

Words: 1521 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Aristotle: the Life Well Lived

...well truly is. The basis of his argument is that happiness, or eudaimonia in Greek, is the final end that humans should strive for. The first step in achieving happiness, according to Aristotle is through reason. Aristotle starts off by saying that what makes humans unique from other animals is our ability to reason. It is through reason that we can become more like the “Gods” and come closer to living Aristotle’s view of the good life. Aristotle separates reason into two distinct categories: practical reason and theoretical reason. Practical reason can be thought of as the ability, through contemplation, to decide what one ought to do. Theoretical reason, on the other hand, can be viewed as reasoning that is directed at answering questions that are, coincidentally enough, theoretical. By theoretical I mean questions that are concerned with explaining and predicting what is going on around us. Going back to Aristotle’s assertion that reason is what separates us from lower beings, we can see that he is probably referring more to theoretical reason as opposed to practical reason. Any animal can exercise practical reason in determining what to do to survive, but can an animal reason theoretically? Aristotle says no and that is what separates human beings from animals. It is through reason, both practical and theoretical, that we develop virtue. According to Aristotle, virtue is the next step towards eudaimonia and it is developed through the exercise of reason. Just like......

Words: 1384 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Aristotle Function Argument

...Explain Aristotle’s human function argument. Does it provide a good basis for understanding eudaimonia? The link between the human function argument and eudaimonia has been harshly criticised due to it being based upon three questionable claims: that human beings have a function, that the good for a human being resides on the fulfilment of that function and that being a good human being leads to eudaimonia. I will nevertheless show that once the concepts of eudaimonia, virtue and human function are correctly understood, it is possible to answer many of the objections that criticise the human function argument as a good basis for the understanding of eudaimonia. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle’s purpose is to discover the human good, that at which we ought to aim. Aristotle tells us that everyone calls this good eudaimonia (happiness, flourishing, success, wellbeing), but that people disagree about what it consists in. Aristotle insist that the point of engaging in ethics is to become good and by searching for ‘’the good’’ he means searching for the highest good; that which is desirable for itself rather than for the sake of some other good and that for whose sake all other goods are desirable. Aristotle then goes on to argue that ‘’eudaimonia’’ (well-being) is the highest end, since all other subordinate goals are sought after only because they promote this well-being or happiness. But unless we can determine which good or goods happiness consist in, it is of no use to......

Words: 2249 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Greek Essay

...Christopher Williams Professor Justin Ryals History Repeats My idea of Greek concepts was the configuration, understanding, and deduction of human virtues. It’s practically blatant with the continuous rise of philosophers. I chose the concepts; Arete, Sophia, Eros, Eudaimonia, and Eunomia. I chose these concepts because they are all concepts that show that people were not only trying to be good people, but the best people they could be. They put these concepts into the form of gods and gate keepers of heaven so people would strive to do right. The continuous literature and artwork put into these concepts is something you no longer see, and that is something I see wrong in the world today. The world today seems to be a very selfish and arrogant place. And I believe the return of these concepts would make life better for all. My first concept arête is seen in many different areas, such as; Achilles in the Illiad because he is the best warrior that man could be. Or, Penelope in the odyssey because she is the best wife that woman could be. The Parthenon is a prime example that Arete isn’t just held to people but also well strongly constructed building, a strong animal, or beautiful pottery. Arete means virtue or excellence of any kind. It meant living up to ones full potential. In Plato’s “Allegory Of The Cave”, the perfect form of something was its arête, what everything, and everyone is trying to get to. As Plato says,” arête is something you are always trying to......

Words: 1162 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

“Virtue Ethics Is of Little Use When Dealing with Practical Ethics.” Discuss.

...“Virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with practical ethics.” Discuss. It is often argued that virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with practical ethics. Virtue ethics does not focus on actions being right or wrong, but on how to be a good person. Virtue ethics raises three questions “who am I?”, “Who I ought to become?” and “How do I get there?”. On the other hand Practical ethics describes situations where an action is needed. Firstly virtue ethics goes back to Plato and Aristotle. Plato’s moral theory centres on the achievement of man’s highest good, which involves the right cultivation of his soul and the harmonious wellbeing of his life (Eudaimonia). Plato seemed to consider that certain virtues such as temperance, courage, prudence and justice (cardinal Virtues) are in balance a person’s actions will be good. It motivates people to want to be good. It shows the importance of education in showing that good actions are their own rewards. When these virtues are in balance a person’s actions will be good and therefore would disagree that virtue ethics is of little use. Aristotle’s ethical theory is known as virtue ethics because at the centre of his description of the good, which are the virtues which shape human character and ultimately human behaviour. However this good human life is one lived in harmony and co-operation with other people, since Aristotle saw people as not only rational beings but also as social beings. Aristotle saw two types of......

Words: 1557 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...compared to other moral philosophies. Some strength include promoting happiness, flourishing, and harmony, while weaknesses entail issues when dealing with laws, various conflicting virtues, as well as religious objections. All moral philosophies that have been discussed thus far have included arguments for and against the said philosophy and virtue ethics is no different. Strengths included in virtue ethics include promoting happiness. By practicing moral virtues we can attain a state of eudaimonia (Pojman). Moral virtues usually lie between vices of two corresponding vices, on of excess and one of deficiency. Eudaimonia is considered a balance of these two. By following virtues we can achieve a better happier life according to Aristole (Pojman). Another strength of virtue ethics is that it promotes human flourishing. “Maslow’s hierarchy of needs puts self actualization at the top, where the fulfillment of our potential is our ultimate goal. This ties in with Aristotle’s concept of Eudaimonia as human flourishing” (RSREVISION). Virtue ethics generally leads to a state of self-actualization, which is the ultimate state of Maslow’s hierarchy once our other needs have been met. By attaining self-actualization individually within the teachings of virtue ethics we are in theory making society better as whole for one another. Another strength of virtue ethics is that it promotes harmony. “Kant is too cerebral, and hedonistic Utilitarianism too base. Aristotle’s theory gives......

Words: 584 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Apply Aristotle Doctrine of the Mean in Contemporary Society

...achieving flourishing happiness throughout life. This explains the reason why Aristotle holds that; happiness can be achieved when everybody embraces virtues, According to Aristotle virtues involves a mean of two evils. This is explained under the Doctrine of the mean. The doctrine of the mean connects to Eudaimonia, and experiences some elements of success and failure in contemporary society. Application of The Doctrine of the mean The Eudoimonia was derived from Greek, and can be translated into varied terms. These terms are aimed at defining prosperity and success in life. The term is a noun, which forms its roots from a combination of the well and evil words in Greek. Examination of the word structure explains the reason why the word can be derived into varied definition. The literal definition of the words is “well-spirit.” This definition is quite unclear to its best. However, the definition of Aristotle is commonly used to ensure standard definition of the term (Curzer 56). Aristotle holds that Eudaimonia involves a synergy, which comprises of both well acting and well feeling. This means that; an individual can only act well when he or she feels well. The idea behind Eudaimonia is concerned with a good feeling derived from acting well. This feeling can be attained when an individual experiences a warm glow. Contrarily, Aristotle is not a Hedonist, because he does not link happiness to pleasure. However, Aristotle ties happiness to good acts. Additionally, it......

Words: 1036 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Aristotle Ethics

...again. In order to move up within the company required learning, flexibility, structure, and practice. I look back today and see how far I’ve come and I can say that I’m happy with my progress and success, but will I ever truly be happy? I won’t ever feel accomplished because there will be something else that I have to work towards to make me ‘happy’ in that moment. This is where Aristotle questions “can a man be happy in within his lifetime?” He states “Happiness is subject to the changes experienced in life.” ‘Eudaimonia’ is a Greek word translated to mean happiness or welfare, in other words, human flourishing. Aristotle’s definition of ‘eudaimonia’ is long and involved. He stipulates that this good must be both final and self-sufficient. “Happiness, is something final and self-sufficient, and is the end of action.” It’s also defined as rational activity of the soul displaying virtue in a complete life and the end of all action. Aristotle’s “eudaimonia” is not something that can be gained momentarily by individual acts; instead it needs to be built up over time. Intellectual (learning) virtues and moral (habit and practice) virtues are two views of Aristotle’s Virtuous Life. Aristotle distinguishes between two kinds of virtue: moral virtue and intellectual virtue. Aristotle says that moral virtues are not inborn, but that they are acquired by developing the habit of exercising them. Aristotle believes that the nature of moral virtues (habit and practice) has......

Words: 1413 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...Aristotle’s theory of moral virtue contends that our ultimate purpose or goal in life should be to reach eudaimonia, but to do so requires our ability to function properly in our thoughts and actions according to our sense of reason and our innate understanding of moral virtues. Additionally, by using principles of both the intellectual (taught or learned) and moral virtue (which becomes habit upon practice and imitation) we must learn to make decisions that are right and just—not necessarily for our own personal benefit, but simply because we possess an understanding that something is the right course of action. Without having these two aspects work in unison the theory of moral virtue is incomplete and impossible In short, it is our intellectual understanding of virtue that allows us to perceive what it right while our moral virtue aids us in carrying out what we know to be the correct and just course of action and these two parts of our concept of virtue lead to what Aristotle calls the “moral theory of virtue” as it is a combination of these parts. In his attempt to explain the theory of moral virtue and, for that matter, the central goal, eudaimonia, Aristotle describes the important concept of finding middle ground in one’s life or, achieving a balance. In line with the theory of moral virtue Aristotle contends that to achieve these aims and reach eudaimonia, one of the most important lessons Aristotle teaches in the theory of moral virtue is strike a balance, or hit a...

Words: 339 - Pages: 2