Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure

In: Social Issues

Submitted By junior43
Words 1074
Pages 5
The process of criminal procedure involves regulations, which aid the order of procedures the government authorities use to apply criminal laws. The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth amendment, and the Supremes Court understanding of the constitution are important for the study of criminal procedures (Zalman, 2008). The Federal Rules in criminal procedures ensure citizens’ rights to due process, right to a fair trial, right to equal protection, and right to lie, liberty, and property. Due process and crime control models play a major role in shaping criminal procedures. Both models hold some form of constitutional values required in the society we live in (Zalman, 2008). In this paper I will briefly discuss the similarities and the differences and how they have an effect on criminal procedure policies. Crime control model is known as the “presumption of guilt” model. This model assumes defendants are guilty, police and prosecutors are precise in their choices to arrest, apprehend, and prosecute suspects. As a result, the remaining steps in the criminal procedures become automatic and the investigative stages can be opposed (Zalman, 2008). Defendants are moved swiftly through the criminal justice system because he or he is presumed guilty until proven innocent in the court of law. Due process is based on the adversary law system, which believes an individual is innocent until proven guilty in the court of law. The adversary system prohibits law enforcement officers, attorneys, and judges from acting against a person who has not broken a law. Due process gives all people suspected of committing a crime constitutional rights and the opportunity to prove his or her innocence through a process of legal procedures (Zalman, 2008). Another difference between the two models is motive. The aim of Due process is to eliminate and prevent mistakes…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal procedure policy paper CJA/364 DEC/19/2012 Susan Strick Criminal procedure policy paper Criminal procedure is broken down into two models and was designed by a professor who studied law at Stand Ford University his name was Herbert Packer. The first model is due process, this process believes in the rights of the individual this will be known as politically liberal. The second model is crime control this supports to regulate the conduct and behavior of individuals. This is considered politically conservative. These models are intended to embody the sets of different values that run the criminal justice system. In this paper both of the criminal procedure will be discussed and compared to show the similarities and differences. This will also be a way of figuring how the effects of policies in the criminal procedure this will be done by looking at the amendments made in the constitution of the United States looking at the fourth, fifth and sixth amendment and also the fourteenth. The fourteenth amendment including the bill of rights will be a critical aspect of achieving the goal of this paper. The procedure that is most used in the criminal proceedings is the due process model. As an individual a person will try to preserve the standard of holding their right to life, property, and liberty. As an individual a person will not let go of the rights without undergoing the right due process promised to them that is stated in the bill of rights. An officer even......

Words: 1132 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary Richard Smith CJA 364 February 24, 2013 Matthew Taylor In the summary of a Bethlehem Twp man being arrested for drug paraphernalia, police also found a 9mm Russian-made pistol which lead to a charge of possession of a hand gun. Township law enforcement officers had probable cause when they received numerous complaints of vehicles regularly driving up and only staying a short length of time at the residence (Warner, 2013). After conducting a lengthy investigation, police obtained a search warrant for the home. While conducting the search warrant, law enforcement officials found unpackaged marijuana hidden inside a toilet, inside the suspect’s pocket, marijuana in plastic bags elsewhere and were able to seize a scale commonly used to weigh the marijuana. That is when they also found the 9mm hand gun in the home. Law enforcement had probable cause because of the complaints and followed correct procedures to obtain the warrant. The suspect was charged with intent to deliver, possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia. The probable cause that the officers had was from the calls that they received from various neighbors. The officers then followed correct procedures to obtain the warrant/arrest warrant. Judges may issue the warrant based on probable cause from the officers. The warrant/arrest warrant needs to be considered as well that the warrant itself does not include the conviction of the suspect....

Words: 448 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Criminal Justice Procedure

...Criminal Justice Procedure Amber Irwin Michiels CRJ306 Instructor Petrov July 31, 2013 Criminal Justice Procedure The criminal justice procedure involves a number of steps that must be taken carefully to ensure that a criminal does not get away with a criminal act because of law enforcement's failure to carry out each step properly. It is also set in place to protect the innocent from being unlawfully convicted. The modern justice process begins with investigation. After a crime has been discovered, evidence is gathered at the scene when possible, and a follow up investigation attempts to reconstruct the sequence of activities. Although a few offenders are arrested at the scene of the crime, most are apprehended later. In such cases, an arrest warrant issued by a judge provides the legal basis for an apprehension by police. An arrest, in which a person is taken into custody, limits the offender's freedom. The Arrest is a serious step in the process of justice. Most arrests are made peacefully, but if a suspect tries to resist, a police officer may need to use force. During arrest and before questioning defendants are advised to the constitutional rights, also known as their Miranda rights. The criminal justice procedure begins with arrest, followed by the booking of suspects, arraignment, preliminary hearing, grand jury trial, pretrial hearings, the criminal trial, followed by sentencing. In this paper, I am also going to discuss constitutional protections......

Words: 3668 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure Policy Sesanee Lewis CJA/364 January 20, 2014 Walsh, Timothy Criminal Procedure Policy Due process and crime control model shapes the procedures of polices regarding criminals and law enforcement. Due process gives citizens the right to be treated as innocent until proven guilty which is the opposite to the crime control model; you are guilty until proven innocent. Two different approaches, one is a process in which citizens is ensured law enforcement conduct themselves within legal procedures during arrest and the collection of evidence; the other process relying on the integrity of law enforcement by not questioning probable cause nor the collection of evidence to show the guilt of an offender. Due Process gives citizens of America the right to not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without law enforcement going obtaining a warrant by a judge. The rights of citizens by way of due process guarantee a fair process within the criminal justice system. The due process model system of values revolves around the concept of primarily of the individual rights and the complementary concept of limitation of official power of the government. Power is always subject to abuse (Griffiths, 1970). Due process limits this power by give law enforcement rules and regulations as to what they can and cannot do to arrest a citizen and obtain evidence for an arrest. The criminal procedure of due process begins at law enforcement legally......

Words: 1150 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Criminal Procedures Case Digest

...they prayed for a TRO, a nullification of the proceedings and a re-trial before an impartial tribunal by an unbiased prosecutor Œ Nov 18, 1985 – a 9-to-2 vote of the SB granted the TRO Œ Nov 28, 1985 – the same 9-to-2 ratio dismissed the petition and lifted the TRO Œ Nov. 29, 1985 – the petitioners filed a motion for recon based on the lack of legal ground for the dismissal Œ Dec 5 – all of the accused were acquitted … even though Galman was not on trial, he was, in effect, convicted as the assassin of Ninoy Œ Mar 6, 1986 – the Mla Times published an article entitled “Aquino Trial A Sham”, which had for its context the revelations of Deputy Tanodbayan Manuel Herrera that the graft court were convinced by Marcos to whitewash the criminal cases Œ June 5 – SC appointed a 3-member commission (Vasquez Commission) to hear and receive evidence of the charges of collusion and pressure Œ July 31 – the Vasquez Commission submitted its report with an affirmation of the “secret meeting” held in Malacañang, wherein Marcos ordered Justice Pamaran to handle the case (without raffling the case first) and for the entire tribunal to have all of the accused acquitted Issue(among others): WON a call for a re-trial of the case would be tantamount to double jeopardy Ratio Decidendi: Where the court lacked jurisdiction to conduct a fair trial, double jeopardy does not attach. Reasons: 29 No court whose presiding justice received “orders or suggestions” from a President......

Words: 23071 - Pages: 93

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure Policy

...Criminal Procedure Policy Paper Devone Calloway University of Phoenix Criminal Procedure Policy Paper “A due process model is a type of criminal justice system which is based on the principle that a citizen has some absolute rights and cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards” ("Due Process Model Law," 2001, p. 1). This model involves two aspects which are procedural and substantive. The main focus of the due process model is the power of the government to protect its society with less focus on the individual liberties of the people. Crime control model is a law that refers to a theory of criminal justice which focuses on decreasing the crime in society through increased police and their prosecutorial powers. Since these two models go hand and hand with criminal justice there will be various opinions of the comparisons and the contrasts. Some of the differences amongst the due process model and the crime control model are that people are innocent until proven guilty in the court of law in conjunction with the due process model. This allows for everyone to be able to receive a fair trial. For those who take the crime control model approach believe that people who are arrested, are guilty and are required to receive punishment by the government. Those who believe in the due process model law feel as though that policing within the criminal justice system is vital to maintaining justice amongst the society. For...

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Criminal Procedure

...Rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments vary. Their impact does take on a whole new light when you scope out the criminal proceeding type of jurisdictional stance if it’s looked at from a different scope and a different perspective when carrying on in the action of law. The Fourth Amendment for police officers has an impact on the everyday working person as they are commuting on highways and are subject to traffic stops for violation of codes. Police officers are given the legal authority to pull over individuals that have been suspected of committing a traffic violation. If upon the officer pulling someone over, he can legally search the car only with probable cause. For example most people understand that we intrinsically have a right to freedoms and for you to have the ability to reveal what part of your life to the public you want is up to you as a person. The Fourth Amendment protects you against “unreasonable search” and seizures by state or federal law enforcement. Authorities cannot, by law, search your vehicle or your person without probable cause. If the officer illegally seizes evidence in that search they cannot use it against a person in a trial. This is also known as the “fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine” wherein evidence that was seized from an officer from a direct result of an improper search cannot by law be admissible at trial. The Fourth Amendment remands fuzzy as to what the definition of probable cause is but an officer would......

Words: 1491 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure Policy

...or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." The Fifth Amendment ensures against self-incrimination, the right to a grand jury and protection against double jeopardy (Hudson, 2010). Self-incrimination means that an individual cannot be compelled to talk. For example; a person who pleads the fifth is simply exercising his or her right to not speak in the event that he or she incriminates themselves. Officers who do not give suspects a Miranda warning may be found to be in violation of the Fifth Amendment (Hudson, 2010). The Fifth Amendment also provides a guarantee that all individuals will receive due process of the law. Due process is the term given to ensure that fair treatment is received during legal proceedings. Every defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Protection from double jeopardy means that a defendant cannot be punished for a crime twice or be found guilty of a crime that he or she was previously acquitted of (Hudson, 2010). Amendment VI The Sixth Amendment provides, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime......

Words: 1446 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure and Practice

...CJT 200 Lecture 12 The Criminal Justice System and process law on Criminal Procedure and Practice from Complaint, investigation, arrest, bail, trial and conviction. When a report or complaint is made, that signals the beginning of the criminal investigative process. The report is an account of an individual, victim, witness or accused person as to what transpired with regards to a specific incident or series of incidents. The officer taking the report will ask pertinent questions and record the report in a diary commonly called a station diary. This report will contain the name, address, occupation, contact number of the person making the report and the date, time, place, persons present at the time and other key ingredients to crystalise the offence warranting investigation. In the case of report of larceny of $5000 for example, the report should contain the amount of money taken, when the money was taken, where the money was taken, the circumstances under which the money was taken and any description of the alleged offender. After the report is properly logged then the next stage would involve the gathering of information. This is where the investigating officer starts to interview persons, collect evidence and record statements from affected parties or witnesses to prove or disprove the facts of the report. During this phase the judges rules, in particular rule 1, is activated clearing the way for a police officer or any person in authority to question anyone from......

Words: 1483 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary David L. Clay CJA/315 February 8, 2016 Scott Horwath Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary Manuel Celis-Acosta is accused to be the ring leader of the Fast and Furious Operation who helped organize the transfer and purchase of about 2,000 weapons to the Sinaloa Castel. He is also accused of providing the weapons used in the kill of border patrol agents Brian Terry. In April 2, 2010 Manuel was stopped by Phoenix Police and booked to jail for cocaine possession and two handguns were confiscated by police at that stop. Manuel Acosta followed by ATF agents for 18 months for the Fast and Furious Operation was previously arrested twice in 2010 violation related to drugs and guns but he was released. After 2 am in the morning Police detected a blue Chevy pick-up truck without its headlights. Police activated their lights and sirens after watching the truck and reports say that handguns were thrown out the windows by Acosta and two associates. At the stop police officer also found other weapons hidden in the backseat and between the front seats as well as numerous of scattered casings in the floor. All three individuals were arrested and booked into jail under different charges. Acosta for narcotics possession, Hector Carlon for aggravated DUI and drug possession and Julio Carrillo for misconduct with a weapon. Prosecutors received the case but it was never file. The case was send back to police for further......

Words: 1105 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure

...Criminal Procedure Policy Order and liberty are two areas within criminal procedure that have tension among one another (book). Order is a stronger approach toward the criminal justice system than liberty. Liberty concerns an individual’s rights to due process, which means everybody deserves the same rights when arrested regardless of the circumstances such as poor person versus a rich person. The two models that were developed by Herbert Packer were the crime control model and the due process model (book). Both models have similarities as well as differences and not one is “good” and the other “bad” according to Packer. The two primary goals within the criminal justice system are the need to enforce law and maintain social order and the need to protect people from injustice (defenseinvestigator). The fourth, fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendments play a signifigant role when analyzing both the due process model and the crime control model. This paper will further explore both models as well as how the models view the fourth, fifth, and sixth amendments and how the fourteenth amendment gives the same rights on a state level as well as federal. Crime Control Model The crime control model is a stern approach to the criminal justice system. As described by Hubert Packer, “the crime control model is like a conveyer belt, moving cases starting from arrest to conviction in a swift and fast process (Book).” Fact finding is what defines this model. If an officer makes......

Words: 1348 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Criminal Procedures

...Criminal Behavior Lorenzo Reid Virginia College Online Abstract The following paper will address the different areas of the Psychological and Psychiatric Foundations of Criminal Behavior. Within this paper, every aspect from theories to what the law states when it comes to this state will be addressed. Criminal Behavior Doctor Leon Eisenberg once stated, "...persons who are seriously mentally ill are far more likely to be the victims of violence than its initiators." (Campbell) Yet how true is that? When it comes to mental illness, there have been several violent crimes that have been committed, and been blamed on mental illness. There are several shows for entertainment such as the show “Criminal Minds”, that attempts to bring a reality and understanding to mental illness and criminal behavior. This show gives a reality to the fact that people can be simply mentally ill and not simply criminals. In early society times, people simply did not take mental illness into account. It was thought that people, regardless of their mental state, should be accountable for their actions. Yet, in today’s society, this is not the case. Due to research and a better developed country, citizens are given an opportunity to show that their mental state was not steady when they committed a crime. So, what is it then, which motivated a person to kill or maim another? How can a person kill someone else, or a numerous amount of people, with no remorse? These questions and......

Words: 3479 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Civil Procedure V. Criminal Procedure

...Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure ENC 1102 34 Week 11 Individual Work Civil Procedure v. Criminal Procedure Civil procedure relates to the process where two parties bring a case to the court for a decision on a particular problem. These problems can include but are not limited to divorces, estate distribution, work men’s comp., injury cases, or even matters such as discrimination in the workplace. Criminal procedure applies to the process where the state or federal government is charging and trying someone for a crime that was committed (Civil Procedure, 2012). The rules in civil procedure are different than those in criminal procedure because the actions that need to be taken are different. Firstly, civil procedure requires that a civil case must begin by filing a complaint. The complaint is then, served to the offending party. Once the defending party receives the complaint, they then drafts and files an answer with the court. A party in a civil case can be anyone including people, businesses, and government personnel. When the parties go in front of the court in a civil case, it is to determine whether a person was injured and if they were injured, how much should be compensated for that injury. All of this information pertaining to the civil case is specifically drafted into the court documents (American Bar, 2012). Civil cases, also, have some Constitutional protection in place. For example, the parties involved in a case must file and receive consent of......

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure Policy

...There are two models to the criminal process: due process and crime control. They serve as the basis for regulation and freedom as it pertains to the application of criminal justice and criminal law. The models are in constant opposition with each other to impose their importance to the system as it pertains to principles in the criminal justice process. Even with the dissimilarity between these two models of criminal law, they both have several positive traits. Similarities The due process and crime control models include an organized topic of standards key to the constitutional order on how criminal law is applied (Packer, 1968). “The machinery of criminal justice—police, prosecution, courts, and corrections—is the formal means by which order is maintained in our society” (Zalman, 2009, p. 4). The mechanics of the criminal justice system utilizes components from each model that are dependent on one’s own likings in regards to the criminal law procedure (Packer, 1968). Although these two models differ in principle, the commonality between them is the same. For example, both models consider the sanction of criminal behavior and recognizing a criminal are dissimilar procedures, when and if probable cause is found the criminal process may be put into effect and the judiciary system has an restricted authority of inquiry and arrest. They also form the basis for the function of the adversarial system, due process, and the defendant’s right to their day in courts (Zalman,......

Words: 1105 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause

...Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause David Sanders Jr. CJA/ 364 June 10, 2012 Matthew Taylor   In the article that I’m going to analyze and regards to the requirements needed for probable cause to conduct a search, seizure or issue an arrest warrant is that of the article publish by Seattle times in 2008. And this particular article, probable cause existed to conduct a search but however to arrest it did not. Law-enforcement agent Brent Hanger on a routine traffic stop pulled over the vehicle belonging to Lacee Hurley, as he approached her vehicle he detected the smell of marijuana. After further investigating he discovered illegal substances and proceeded to arrest Lacee Hurley and her passenger Jeremy Grande. Once the matter of the arrest was taking to court the ruling was overturned due to the fact that not enough evidence existed to form probable cause to commit such in arrest. The reason why was because according to the Supreme Court the arrest was based on the fact that the officer had smelled marijuana from the vehicle and finding illegal substances, however the smell of marijuana can linger in a vehicle for weeks at a time; and the mere presence of the odor doesn’t warrant any officer the right to commit such a such nor an arrest. The other reason why the ruling was overturned was because an innocent person could have been driving the car and not at all be a smoker and now they are being punished for a crime that they didn’t even commit (2011 State Supreme......

Words: 513 - Pages: 3