Premium Essay

Assess the Us Constitution

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Des400
Words 1737
Pages 7
Assess the US Constitution

The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the USA. The Constitution, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government. Its first three articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judiciary, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Since the Constitution came into force in 1789, it has been amended twenty-seven times. In general, the first ten amendments, known collectively as the Bill of Rights, offer specific protections of individual liberty and justice and place restrictions on the powers of government. The majority of the seventeen later amendments expand individual civil rights. At seven articles and twenty-seven amendments, it is the shortest written constitution in force. The Constitution of the United States was the first constitution of its kind, and has influenced the constitutions of other nations. However, it has many flaws, firstly the amendment process is too difficult, thereby making it near impossible to change it. Secondly the power of judicial review gives the unelected unaccountable Supreme Court too much power. Thirdly the constitution leads to gridlock and finally some parts make no sense in modern society and don’t work as the Framers intended. Nevertheless there are positives; primarily that Federalism has proved to be an excellent compromise between strong national government and state government diversity. The demanding amendment process has prevented frivolous, frequent and ill conceived changes. The rights and liberties of Americans have been protected. Finally the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review has made the constitution even more adaptable to change through…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Comparison of Us Constitution to Iraq Constitution

...A constitution can be defined as a laid down rules for the government which are time and again codified as a form of written manuscript that spells out and confines the functions and ability to exercise force of a political party (power). In the case of countries and sovereign regions of federal states the phrase refers exclusively to a constitution defining the core principles of politics, and instituting the configuration, procedures, powers and duties, of a government. Most constitutions guarantee rights to the people by limiting the government’s own reach. We will be comparing and contrasting the American constitution against the Iraqi constitution. Both constitutions are codified. Under the patronage of a British military occupation in 1925, Iraqis first constitution entered into force which then formed a monarchy which remained in effect until in 1958, the revolution established a republic. Interim constitutions have been adopted over the years but a referendum that took place in 2005 approved the constitution currently being used by Iraqis. On the other hand the American constitution is considered foundation and basis of the legal right to exercise power over another (authority) essential to the existence of the United States of America and the federal government of the United States. It grants the framework for the institute of the United States government and for the rapport of the federal government to the states, to citizens, and to all people within the United......

Words: 1227 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Critically Assess the Virtues and Shortcomings of Britain’s ‘Un-Codified’ Constitution

...Critically assess the virtues and shortcomings of Britain’s ‘un-codified’ Constitution Britain are one of the few countries in the world that still posses and un-codified constitution, other states that posses un-codified constitutions are New Zealand and Israel. A constitution is a set of rules which guidelines what the people of the nation and the government have the rights to do, these rules or guidelines are normally printed in one sovereign place. An un-codified constitution differs from this as is not one sovereign book or piece of writing that outlines the rules of the state. This short answer will assess the strengths and weakness of Britain having an un-codified constitution. The first strength to consider is the fact that our un-codified constitution is more flexible then a codified constitution. Many nations find it difficult to pass legislation because the constitution holds the government accountable and protects the individuals. Example of this could be after terrorist attacks Britain was able to quickly pass legislation detaining terror suspects for longer period of time, where as other nations constitutions protected the individuals liberties and prevented their governments from detaining suspects for long periods of time. From the first argument we can see that flexibility is a strength of an un-codified constitution, however it can also be a weakness. Without the codified constitution there is no checks on the government other then the opposition, a...

Words: 579 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

United States Constitution and the State of the Death Penalty in the Us

...United States Constitution and The State of the Death Penalty in the US As of April 1, 2008, the Death Penalty was authorized by 37 states, the Federal Government, and the U. S. Military. Those jurisdictions without the Death Penalty include 13 states and the District of Columbia. (Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin). Premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state it violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the right to be free from cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. Over two-thirds of the countries in the world 141 have now abolished the death penalty in law or practice. In the U. S., 17 states have put an end to state-sanctioned killing. Dakota Territory established the death penalty in 1865. The penalty was carried into North Dakota law at statehood. In 1915, the penalty was restricted to persons convicted of committing a first-degree murder while already under a life sentence for first-degree murder. The death penalty was abolished when North Dakota's new criminal code became effective, July 1, 1975. According to historian Frank E. Vyzralek, only one legal execution took place in the northern half of Dakota Territory in Grand Forks in 1885. Seven legal executions took place after statehood. The last one John Rooney in 1905 was the first to take place inside the prison walls at Bismarck.......

Words: 790 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Us Constitution

...there were many weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, many believed that by creating a Constitution it would solve many of the nations problems. Fortunately, the Constitution solved many problems, but created some big flaws that still remain today. One of the weaknesses in the Articles of the Confederation was that most of the governmental power was held by the states. It created a weak national government. The states were afraid that congress, due to its limited power, was unable to control the states. The government under the Articles of Confederation was a legislative branch and had no executive or judicial branches. Under the constitution, Mr. John Jay, of the Federalist Papers #3, believed that once a national government was established it would be wiser than the states. The solution was achieved by more power being held by the national government. Each state must be under the authority of the national government and each state has control of local government. These examples can be seen today in the local government and police department. Another weakness in the Articles of Confederation is it only had one branch of government. It was called the legislative branch. There were no other branches of government. In order for the legislative branch to take action on any government matter it required the approval of all of the states. In order to fix the problem in the constitution they added 2 more branches of government. These are called executive and judicial......

Words: 580 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

How Difficult Is It to Amend the Us Constitution?

...There have only been 27 constitutional amendments since it was created. This shows how difficult it is to amend the constitution and rarely it is amended; only 17 of the amendments have happened in the last 210 years. There are four key reasons why it is hard to amend the constitution but there are other reasons, not to do with the amendment process, that have meant the constitution hasn’t been, or needed to be, amended. The first reason is that the Founding Fathers created a deliberately difficult process. To amend the constitution both Congress and that States have to agree using super-majorities. The use of super-majorities makes the process even more difficult. This is shown by the hundreds of amendments that have been proposed but not successfully carried through and legitimised. The need to get support from a super-majority in all the States is also very time consuming and costly and so it is even more difficult for politicians to get and amendment passed. Furthermore there is a huge percentage of the American population which are at opposing sides of the American political compass. This means that it is often very hard to get everyone to agree to the same policies and amendments and therefore very difficult to get a super-majority at state-level. The process created by the Founding Fathers means that it is incredibly difficult to amend the constitution but it wasn’t just amendment process they created which limits the number of amendments. The Founding Fathers also...

Words: 625 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Us Constitution

...Canada Constitution vs Unites States Most countries around our world for the most part have a constitution for people to live by or another resource laying out the freedoms for the citizens for the countries. A Constitution of course is the foundation for one’s country that he or she lives in. The constitution or other government rules lay the foundation for the government as well as the citizens that reside in the country. This is especially true for the lands of America and the Monarchy of the providence of Canada. Both nations citizens live by the rights of each constitutions everyday even though in some cases our rights are not always treated as a nation of free people should be. Of course the United States and Canada have different freedoms than other lands but, these freedoms and rights for both countries were not easily achieved wars were fought and to many people died for the cause on both sided of the wars for the lands. The United States constitution was written in 1787 between May and September after the American colonies citizens won their independence from the British rule of the king and queen. The men who wrote the constitution were called the framers, they met and discussed what would be in it which some of the things were not put in it and the articles. There were 55 Framers of the constitution. Among them some familiar names as George Washington, James Madison, Benjamin franklin, alexander Hamilton which he invented the first national bank for the......

Words: 1467 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Principles of the Us Constitution

...and Articles of the Constitution Part One: Table of Primary Principles of the US Constitution Self-Government | Self-government is government that is provided by or voted on by the inhabitants of the country or group as opposed to having external governing forces. The Constitution names Self-government as the ultimate and proper means of government. The US uses majority rule as part of self-government. | Separation of Powers | Separation of powers is the division of governing powers among separate branches of the government. This idea was widely favored as many states started drafting their governments and was used as a founding principle of the US Constitution. Basically, separation of powers assigns one group of people as task and another group another task. This helps in many ways, primarily it makes sure that each group is skilled at the powers assigned to them. It also paves the way for Checks and Balances. | Checks and Balances | Checks and Balances is an elaborate system that is written into the US Constitution that requires the divided branches of government to all work together to make any major decisions. Originally, this system was designed so that no one branch of government overpowered the others. A single branch cannot act decisively without the support of the other branches. The three branches of government in the US are designed to overlap so that Checks and Balances can succeed. | Checks and Balances Over the years, the US system of Checks......

Words: 1108 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

‘Assess the View That the Us Constitution Ensures Limited Government’

...The US Constitution, written in Philadephia in 1787 by the Founding Fathers was the product of the revolutionary war of independence, with it’s foundations strongly influenced by the works of political theorists such as Montesquieu and Locke. The Founding Fathers favoured a government that prevented any individual or particular group becoming tyrannical. Furthermore, they strongly opposed the notion of excessive government power, seen as the potential threat to individual freedom, wanting to protect minorities as well as the population as a whole, from arbitrary or unjust rule. Consequently, the Founding Fathers outlined main provisions within the US constitution in order to avoid tyranny: the separation of powers, a federal structure of government and also providing citizens inalienable and entrenched rights through the implementation of the Bill of Rights. Arguably, these provisions as a result mostly ensure, as the Founding Fathers had hope to achieve, limited government, in so much as the size and scope of the federal government is limited to an extent in which it is necessary only for the common good of people. The separation of powers prevalent in the USA, whereby political power is distributed between the executive, the legislature and the judiciary branches of government, were adopted from the Founding Fathers by the principles of Montesquieu, who argued for a separation of powers into legislative, executive and judiciary branches in order to avoid tyranny. This......

Words: 2217 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Constitution

...According to the US History Scene website, the Articles of Confederation gave the states full ruling power over themselves on any matter that was not explicitly mentioned by Congress; and that was where all of the Articles of Confederations’ problems began. Because the states had so much self-governing power, there were problems with economic disorganization, legislative inefficiencies, and a lack of central leadership (Brackemyre, n.d.). The US History Scene website told me that there were three main organizational problems. First was the fact that they could not levy taxes to raise funds. The states were permitted to create taxes to pay for their self-government, and to pay the government the fees owed, but the government itself was not allowed to create taxes to pay off the military and other debt incurred during the Revolutionary war. This was a problem because even though the states were supposed to pay the government monies based off of their land value, often it was not paid. Next was fact that the government had little control over trade. The only control granted was in regards to the Natives, and only then if it did not infringe with the states. The government dealt with foreign treaties (as long as they were not trade related), and the states had complete control over all things trade related (except treaties). This caused problems because each state did what was best for them, and there was no unity as a country. The third and final problem was that there was no......

Words: 1448 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Us Constitution Is No Longer Fit for Purpose

...This always the judiciary The US constitution is no longer fit for purpose The Constitution was made after the first 13 colonies separated seeking independence and declaring themselves an independent nation. The constitution was created by the 4 founding fathers and includes articles which state the duties of the three main parts of government: the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The articles also talk about the separate powers of the Federal and State government, and how to change the Constitution. In 1789 the Bill of rights were proposed and ratified in 1791. In this essay I will discuss whether the constitution is no longer fit for purpose. Another significant point to show the constitution is still fit for purpose is it protects the rights and freedoms of Americans. The 1st amendment guarantees the most basic and fundamental rights, freedom of religion, speech, press and assembly. An example of this is in Texas V Johnson where the meaning of freedom of speech was extended. As the Supreme Court held Johnson not guilty, this protected his rights. However The Supreme court was only able to interpret the constitution differently because it is very vague. This shows that the constitution has loop holes and therefore is not fit for purpose. Another significant point to show the constitution is still fit for purpose is federalism has proved to be an excellent compromise between strong national government and state government diversity.......

Words: 457 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Explain the Key Principles of the Us Constitution

...The US constitution is a codified and entrenched document that outlines how the government should be ran, what liberties it gives to the citizens of the USA as well as outlines key principles of living in the country. As it is a liberal constitution it outlines the rights of the people. It does that in the first 10 amendments that were passed four years after the actual constitutions was created by the founders. They are called the Bill of Rights. They outline the right of every citizen of freedom of speech, religion. Also the highly disputed right to bare arms as a part of the militia. As well as these, it also refers to different rights that are granted at the time of trial. Some of them are archaic, such as the third amendment that restricts billeting and was probably made to act in the time of Civil War. The constitution also puts restrictions on the government and how it should be managed. The separation of powers allows for the government to be separated into different groups. This allows them all to focus on one job only. This also act as a barrier so one group does not have all the power. They are separated into the Legislative, Executive and Judicial. The Legislative is in charge of making laws; the executive is in charge of enforcing the laws; the judicial decides on the punishments for those who break the law. Federalism is the idea of splitting political power between a large group and smaller groups. In the case of the united states, there is state government......

Words: 538 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assess the Strengths of the Uk Constitution

...Assess the strengths of the UK constitution [25 marks] A constitution is a set of principles, that may be uncodified (unwritten) or codified (written), that relates to how power is distributed within a political system, and establishes how a state is to be organised and governed. Constitutions seek to establish duties, powers and functions of various institutions of government and contribute to defining the relationship between the state and the individuals, for example, defining the extent of civil liberty. The UK constitution helps provide legitimacy to those, of which, are in power, but also limits government power. Although the UK constitution is uncodified, as a whole, parts of the constitution are codified, for example, the European Convention on Human Rights is a codified part of British Law, even though it was designed and created by the Council of Europe, in 1950. Firstly, the UK constitution, being uncodified, means that it is flexible and can be easily adapted to changing circumstances, which could include referendum use and the continuous changing role of the House of Lords. The UK constitution is often called 'organic', which means that the constitution is rooted in society, and consequently means that when society and it's values change the UK constitution can adapt and change to society, without delay or hesitation. Furthermore, because the UK constitution is uncodified, it allows Parliament to pass Acts, without long delays and also allows new,......

Words: 738 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Assess the Arguments for Codifying the Constitution

...recent years there has been much debate within Parliament over the possible codification of the British Constitution and it is always a topic that people often find very hard to agree on. Though some parts of what may be a codified constitution have been introduced, such as The Human Rights Act which established a codified set of rules and the introduction of devolution, Britain is currently uncodified and so this brings up the arguments of whether update the system or not The initial argument for the change is it was remove the transparency of rules and laws, the key constitutional are collected into a single document all clearly stated with great difficulty of alteration. This portrays exactly what the beliefs of Parliament are and restricts law breaking. Not only does this deter people from committing offences but also makes it simple to enforce as every charge wish be on the same wavelength. An argument to contradict this however would be that's not every crime committed is the same so the variation in the punishment given would also have to vary and with the defining of the law there is actually potential for it to become less democratic. Along with this as times are forever changing and technology is being updated, the demand for laws to be amended is crucial as without it people could technically exploit the system ‘legally’. Another bonus of a codified Constitution is the fact that it is authoritative meaning it is a higher-level and so it lines all political......

Words: 1062 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Explain the Principles of the Separation of Powers Found in the Us Constitution

...writing by Montesquieu in the 1750s, he proposed a constitutional government with three separate branches of government and all of the branches would have the ability to check the powers of the other branches. This had a big impact on the United States Constitution, where the Legislative , Executive and Judicial branches are kept under control by the other three branches to prevent abuse of power. Congress has the power to legislate in the United States and congress cannot delegate its lawmaking responsibilities to any other agency and there has been a number of supreme court cases in which congress has tried to delegate responsibilities to another branch of government such as the 1998 Clinton vs City of New York case. Congress also has the power to restrain the power of the executive in order to keep the executive in line and not have that branch abuse its power. The Executive power is in the power of the president and the president is “the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy , Militia of several states when called into service” he has the power to make treaties and appointments “with advice and consent of the senate” receive ambassadors and public ministers and “take care that the laws be faithfully executed”, the constitution doesn’t need the president to enforce the law personally, the presidents subordinates can fulfil those duties instead. Congress although can by impeachment stop appointments to the executive and restrict the president. Even though potential......

Words: 341 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Us Constitution

...The United States Constitution The US Constitution During the American Revolutionary war with Britain, we were fighting for our freedom from England. When individuals came over from Europe to settle here in America, they were still under the thumb of the British Government. We needed to win the war to gain the independence from England, to form our own government. While the war was raging, members of all 13 colonies gathered and eventually signed the Articles of Confederation. These articles were clearly written concerning our laws, equality, standard issues, and inspiration for the people. The Articles did not come without their problems. There was a lack of representation, they had limited funds. The war effort was very expensive. The dollar of the dollar had decreased and the taxes on imports was so high that goods were unavailable. The economy was decreasing was because credit was necessary. There was problem in the fact that our navy was decreasing because the pirates were taking over our ships and stealing our goods kidnapping our soldiers a holding them for ransom. It also offered limited power. The Constitution was built upon the articles of Confederation. The articles did not have the right to tax. They were built on a single house in the legislature, thus having a single vote. They had no judicial powers either. They could......

Words: 1105 - Pages: 5